Is P. Stephen Lamont working for or Against the Iviewit Shareholders and the best interest of the Iviewit Inventors?
******
Below is an excerpt from an SEC letter to be filed shortly regarding information regarding the fraudulent actions of P. Stephen Lamont in his continued representation of Iviewit, as CEO no less, at an address where no Iviewit company has ever been incorporated or listed with any agency.
P. Stephen Lamont was fired long ago and has no right to act in any capacity for Iviewit or Iviewit Shareholders.
P. Stephen Lamont also has been reported to the courts for his criminal activities in representing shareholders in my Federal RICO and Antitrust case when he is not a licensed attorney and never has passed the bar.
You will find other information below regarding the illegal activities of P. Stephen Lamont and he has been reported to State and Federal agencies regarding these crimes.
I advise anyone considering dealing with P. Stephen Lamont in any capacity to check with your legal counsel about the possible ramifications you may incur regarding any issues with Iviewit and Lamont. These latest assaults on my character etc. appear to be feeble attempts by a desperate man whose cover and misdeeds have been exposed.
P. Stephen Lamont also references filings with the US Second Circuit whereby his separate appeal has been dismissed but fails to mention that in my appeal he also was identified for illegally representing Iviewit Shareholders when he is not an attorney.
• FEBRUARY 15, 2001 EFFECTIVE DATE - SIGNED WARNER BROS. LICENSE AND SERVICE AGREEMENT @
http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20010822%20-%20SIGNED%20Warner%20Bros%20Agreement%20AOL.pdf
• August 15, 2001 Irell & Manella LLP Bills for Services for Warner Bros et al. and Sony Licensing Agreements @
http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/Patents/Paul%20Allen/old%20patent/LEGAL/Irell%20&%20Manella/Bills/2001%2008%2029%20-%20Irell%20Bill.pdf
It is imperative for the SEC to note that after the Signed Licensing and Service Agreement, Iviewit opened a California Office inside a Warner Bros. building, in order to take over encoding operations for their online content, and more. Iviewit began billing according to the Licensing and Service agreement. Please note the language in the Licensing and Service agreement pertaining to the Proprietary nature and Confidentiality of the Iviewit inventions.
Suddenly, after the agreements were signed and operations were underway, Wayne M. Smith ~ Vice President and Chief Patent Counsel at Warner Bros. began seeking a re-review of Proskauer Partner Kenneth Rubenstein’s (“Rubenstein”) prior patent opinions regarding the Iviewit inventions to Warner Bros. employees. Smith then claimed to Colter that he found problems while reviewing Rubenstein’s opinion with the patents on file at the US Patent Office[1].
At this point, allegedly, a coordinated conspiratorial effort between Smith, Rubenstein and others began to derail the already signed Iviewit agreements with Warner Bros. et al.
o Whereby former Acting CEO of Iviewit P. Stephen Lamont, ( a referral emanating from AOL’s Leonsis ) Smith and Rubenstein then worked to derail the Licensing and Service Agreement. Warner Bros. then further attempted to deny the existence of this BINDING CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATION as further evidenced in letters exhibited herein, whereby the agreement is attempted to be wholly denied.
The amount owed in service fees since the signing of the contracts would be an enormous amount over the almost 10 years of use and where Warner Bros et al. have never notified Iviewit they were cancelling such contract, perhaps because they were denying its existence.
o The emails forward from this point in the timeline begin to attempt to hide from the fact that Licensing and Service Agreements were already in place while also hiding these facts and liabilities from Shareholders and Auditors. The alleged fraud may again have catastrophic effect on these highly traded stocks, reaching back to this point in time and possibly further back.
• April 04, 2001 Letter from Colter to William J. "Bill" Raduchel (“Raduchel”) ~ Chief Technology Officer and Executive Vice President at AOL.
AOL’s Leonsis referred Raduchel to do further due diligence for an investment in the Iviewit companies, in addition to the Licensing and Encoding deal already signed.
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20010404%20Colter%20to%20Raduchel%20Leonsis%20referral%20AOL%20Warner%20Bros.pdf
• May 25, 2001 Letters to and from Douglas Chey (“Chey”), Senior Vice President of Technology for Sony Pictures Digital Entertainment and Divisional CIO, Motion Pictures and Television Productions of Sony Pictures Entertainment.
Chey formerly with Warner Bros. was working with Iviewit at Sony ( also under Signed Agreements ) together with Warner to do a Five Studio Movie Download Project, Movielink, where the Iviewit inventions were to be the backbone enabling technologies to make digital download and streaming possible as a commercial endeavor.
Since that time, Warner Bros. and Sony have both done similar digital downloading projects, in violation of Signed Agreements with Iviewit.
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20010525%20Sony%20Doug%20Chey%20Endorsement%20of%20Tech%20and%20Advisory%20Board%20Option%20letter.pdf
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20100120%20Douglas%20Chey%20Sony%20Bio.pdf
The SEC should also begin FORMAL INVESTIGATION
of Sony’s involvement in these matters.
Similar calls to those described herein to Warner Bros. et al. for sound business discussions to attempt to alleviate shareholder liabilities have gone wholly ignored by Sony’s In House Counsel, Executives and Auditors. I will be filing a more formal complaint shortly with the SEC but this should not delay immediate investigation by the SEC, in order to preclude Massive Liabilities to Shareholders of Sony.
The SEC can take this Formal Complaint additionally
as a FORMAL COMPLAINT AGAINST SONY.
• December 20, 2001 ~ P. Stephen Lamont's letter to Kenneth Rubenstein regarding Smith and Rubenstein and the refusal of Rubenstein to RE-OPINE to Smith due to what he claims is a “CONFLICT”, which led further to the breakdown of relations between Iviewit and Warner Bros et al. Lamont later affirmed to Shareholders in a written communication that Microsoft had planted him in the Iviewit companies.
Later P. Stephen Lamont changed that story to AOL and Leonsis’ niece had planted him in Iviewit through AOL Founder Leonsis’ best friend Chuck Brunelas (“Brunelas”). Brunelas recruited under contract Lamont to the Iviewit companies on behalf of Leonsis. Lamont’s revelations of being planted at the company which came after he was hired led to the termination of Lamont at that time[2].
December 20, 2001 P. Stephen Lamont Letters to Kenneth Rubenstein ~
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20020611%20System%20and%20Method%20for%20Fraud%20on%20USPTO.pdf
Pages 455-462
o November 09, 2001 ~ Brunelas Employment Agreement
http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20011109%20Chuck%20Brunelas%20Agreement%20re%20Warner%20Bros%20AOLTW.pdf
o Based on new information since that time, it is alleged that Rubenstein, Lamont, Leonsis and Smith operated together to sabotage Iviewit/Warner Bros. et al. relations and others, purposefully to breach the prior signed licensing agreements and avoid paying the royalties owed to the Iviewit companies, using the old “good guy / bad guy” routine.
The SEC should note here that Hall and I recently reported Lamont to Federal and State authorities for alleged collusion in the RICO activities claimed in my Federal RICO and Antitrust Lawsuit, including ongoing criminal activities[3].
Further, Lamont continues to represent himself and Iviewit Shareholders as the Iviewit CEO, when he is fully aware of his termination from employment and that he has no authorization from the Board of Directors, Management or Shareholders to represent their security interests in Iviewit companies, this securities fraud also should be subject for investigation by the SEC.
• P. Stephen Lamont claims to be CEO of Iviewit Technologies, Inc. in multiple correspondences and Federal court papers with an address at 175 King Street. Armonk, N.Y. 10504 and whereby no Iviewit offices were ever opened or authorized at this address. The office is directly across the street from Defendant in my Federal RICO and Antitrust Lawsuit IBM’s world headquarters.
o Additional Evidence for the SEC regarding P. Stephen Lamont is contained in a June 18, 2009 Letter to New York Attorney General Chief of Staff, Steven M. Cohen regarding fraudulent activities of Lamont @
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20090618%20FINAL%20NYAG%20Steven%20Cohen%20Letter%20Re%20Lamont%20Signed.pdf
o The SEC should note here that Lamont’s initial resume submitted by Iviewit contracted employment recruiter, Brunelas, is materially different and contradicts what Lamont himself recently claims regarding his past on the Iviewit Homepage, in multiple court filings and other letters to Iviewit shareholders.
• Original 2001 Resume Submitted to Iviewit on P. Stephen Lamont by Brunelas @
http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/Lamont%20Resume%20Given%20to%20Iviewit%20by%20Chuck%20Brunelas%20AOL%20Warner%20Bros.pdf
• 2001 Resume Claims the following:
Columbia University School of Law ~ J. D. in Commercial and Regulatory Law - May 1992
Columbia University Graduate School of Business ~ M.B.A. in Finance and Accounting - May 1981
State University of New York at Cortland ~ B.A. in Economics - June 1978
• 2009 Iviewit Homepage Statement written by P. Stephen Lamont claims:
“By way of introduction, I am P. Stephen Lamont, former Acting CEO of Iviewit (counsel advised all Iviewit executives to resign their posts and work along side Iviewit rather than within Iviewit, as the former Board of Directors, Counsel and Accountants, disbanded without requisite notice to Shareholders in violation of law, thereby leaving massive liability and exposure) and a significant shareholder in Iviewit.
With more than a fifteen year track record as a multimedia technology and consumer electronics licensing executive and holder of a J.D. in Intellectual Property Law from Columbia University, an M.B.A in Finance, and a B.S. in Industrial Engineering” Source www.iviewit.tv homepage.
• Whereby Lamont’s legal and other degrees claimed are wholly different and therefore false in one or both of his background accounts as they are materially different, again causation for further investigation of Lamont by the SEC and other investigators this letter has been copied or addressed to.
• Further, you will note that Lamont refers to himself as “former Acting CEO of Iviewit” and claims counsel advised him to resign any official role due to the potential for charges of fraud, and I advised Lamont to follow counsels’ advice and personally, I did not accept any official roles on counsels’ advice.
Yet, even in recent court documents and other illegally signed documents executed by Lamont to major Blue Chip companies, including Microsoft, Lamont now represents himself as CEO of Iviewit inapposite of counsels’ advice, at an address that is not registered to any company Lamont claims to be employed as CEO by.
• August 05, 2009 Lamont Letter to Microsoft http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20090805%20Lamont%20Illegal%20Letter%20to%20Microsoft.pdf
• Lamont further now claims such executive role in my Federal RICO and Antitrust Lawsuit, claiming he is CEO of Iviewit, when no Board has ever put him in that position and when he is fully cognizant that he has no authority legally to represent Iviewit Shareholders. Lamont even attempts to represent Iviewit Shareholders and Companies currently in Federal Court, while not having ever passed the bar to practice law and therefore precluded from representing others in court. Again, cause for further investigation of Lamont.
• February 09, 2009 Lamont Court Filing
http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20090209%20Lamont%20Attempt%20to%20Quash%20Bernstein%20Motion.pdf
• The SEC should note here that while the document claims service on February 09, 2008, it appears executed February 09, 2009.
Whereby the SEC should also note that Lamont does not represent himself individually in the Lawsuit but acts on behalf of Iviewit Shareholders of which he has no authorization from Shareholders to act on their behalf and also is not a lawyer, making it ILLEGAL for him to act on others behalf in a legal capacity.
The District Court and Second Circuit Court notified of this ILLEGAL representation and asked by me to force amendment of the complaint, instead continue to allow the ILLEGAL representation of Lamont to continue. This ILLEGAL representation of Shareholders is also a serious criminal act.
• Finally, at the company Digital Factory that Lamont lists as one of his former employers, in his resume previously exhibited herein, one of the company employees later disclosed that Lamont had been in stock trouble for securities fraud with the board of that company, of course Lamont’s resume failed to disclose this material fact.
• December 31, 2001 – Letter from Brunelas to Greg B. Thagard (“Thagard”) ~ Vice President Advanced Technology Technical Operations at Warner Bros. The letter is regarding Thagard’s acceptance of an Iviewit Advisory Board Position. Later both Thagard and Colter would receive Iviewit Stock options for their Board roles with approval of Warner Bros. and Sony executives.
o http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20011231%20Brunelas%20to%20Thagard%20Regarding%20Joining%20Iviewit%20Advisory%20Board.pdf
• January 07, 2002 ~ Letters by Lamont regarding his meeting with Rubenstein regarding Warner Bros et al. Rubenstein was presented the exhibited document in draft form at his deposition, where he read it and then dodged questions regarding why his name is referenced in relation to opinions he gave to Warner Bros. et al. after denying he knew anything about Iviewit or the patents.
The letter wholly contradicts his prior denial of knowing of the Iviewit inventions or Eliot Bernstein, contradicting his sworn deposition statements and sworn letters to Judge Jorge Labarga constituting multiple instances of perjury and more.
January 07, 2002 and more P. Lamont letters to Kenneth Rubenstein
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/2003%2006%2003%20Iviewit%20Rebuttal%20to%20Wheeler%202nd%20Response_Final.pdf
Pages 19-23
o November 20, 2002 Kenneth Rubenstein Deposition and Deposition Exhibits
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/Depositions%20BOOKMARKED%20SEARCHABLE%20with%20hyperlink%20comments.pdf
Pages 1-100, the exhibits attached to the deposition show Kenneth Rubenstein’s denials.
• January 14, 2002 Warner Bros. employee Colter’s internal Warner Bros. document containing an ADMISSION OF USE OF IVIEWIT PROPRIETARY PROCESSES AND VIOLATION OF NON-DISCLOSURE AGREEMENTS by many Warner Bros. et al. employees. The letter also provides affirmation that Rubenstein ( MPEGLA LLC Patent Counsel, former Iviewit Proskauer Rose Patent Counsel and Warner Bros. counsel ) opined favorably to Warner Bros. The document again directly refutes Rubenstein’s statements in deposition and written communications to the Labarga court that he did not opine or even know of the Iviewit inventions.
o http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/2002%2001%2015%20AOLTW%20RUBENSTEIN%20OPINION%20comments.pdf
• February 17, 2002 – Eliot Bernstein letter to Brunelas Regarding Smith’s sudden request to have Rubenstein of Proskauer speak to him to re-opine on his former statements, already exhibited herein, regarding the efficacy and novelty of the patents.
Kenneth Rubenstein was acting Patent Counsel to Iviewit as indicated in the exhibited Wachovia Private Placement Memorandum that Proskauer billed to author and distribute to Iviewit potential investors when he opined to Warner Bros.
The links below provide information on Kenneth Rubenstein’s position as an Iviewit Board member and Iviewit Patent Counsel despite his statements to the contrary.
At the time Smith requested to speak with Kenneth Rubenstein, Proskauer Rose and Kenneth Rubenstein already were terminated by Iviewit and investigations were already underway regarding the patent thefts and more.
o February 17, 2002 Letter from Eliot Bernstein to Brunelas.
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20020117%20Bernstein%20letter%20to%20Brunelas%20Regarding%20Smith%20response%20to%20Colter%20to%20talk%20with%20Rubenstein%20Poskauer.pdf
o January 2001 Wachovia Private Placement Memorandum, whereby the SEC should note here that Kenneth Rubenstein is listed both as Iviewit Patent Counsel and an Iviewit Advisory Board member.
http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/Wachovia%20Private%20Placement%20Memorandum%20Bookmarked.pdf
Page 4 – “Company has retained Foley & Lardner to shepherd its patent development and procurement. In addition, the Company has retained Kenneth Rubenstein of Proskauer Rose, LLP to oversee its entire patent portfolio - Mr. Rubenstein is the head of the MPEG-2 patent pool.
Page 16 - “Strong and Experienced Board of Directors and Advisory Board.” iviewit's Board of Directors and Advisors consist of several well-established individuals from the technology, entertainment, and financial community.
Directors have extensive backgrounds with top-tier firms such as Goldman Sachs, Kidder Peabody, and McKinsey & Co. Crossbow Ventures has provided $3.0 million in funding and sits on the Board.
Technology and entertainment guidance comes from a partner at Armstrong Hirsch Jackoway & Wertheimer and from Kenneth Rubenstein, the head of the MPEG-2 patent pool.
Additionally on Page 16 - “The Company has retained Foley & Lardner to shepherd its patent development and procurement. In addition, the Company has retained Kenneth Rubenstein of Proskauer Rose, LLP to oversee its entire patent portfolio. The Company's strategy is to establish market precedence through licensing of trade secrets and know-how.
Page 38 – ADVISORY BOARD SECTION
“Kenneth Rubenstein Partner, Proskauer Rose LLP. Mr. Rubenstein is a partner at Proskauer Rose LLP law firm and is the patent attorney for iviewit. He is a registered patent attorney before the US. Patent & Trademark Office.
Mr. Rubenstein counsels his clients with respect to the validity and infringement of competitors' patents, as well as prosecutes patent applications. For the past several years he has worked on the formation of a patent pool, for MPEG-2 technology, involving large consumer electronics and entertainment companies.
He is also a former member of the legal staff at Bell Laboratories. Mr. Rubenstein received his law degree, cum laude, from New York Law School and his Ph.D. in physics from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology where he also graduated with a B.S. Degree.
The SEC should note here that Rubenstein’s attempt to claim he never heard of Iviewit, including at his deposition, allegedly is due to the massive conflicts of interest that Rubenstein had.
If Kenneth Rubenstein were patent counsel to Iviewit and simultaneously counsel to Warner Bros. et al. when he originally opined to Colter, without conflict waivers or disclosure, this obviously would have violated attorney conduct codes and law.
Additionally, Kenneth Rubenstein is conflicted with the patent pooling scheme and artifice to fraud inventors he has created, MPEGLA LLC, where again he acted as counsel and founder of MPEGLA LLC while also patent counsel to Iviewit.
The conflict here is again obvious where the Iviewit technologies were the single greatest threat to his pools as Iviewit has the dominant technology, which without, the MPEG license would be worthless.
The SEC should note that Rubenstein initially misrepresented himself and Joao as Proskauer Partners to Iviewit, when prior to learning of my inventions they were both with Meltzer.
Kenneth Rubenstein is counsel and sole patent evaluator for MPEGLA LLC now one of the largest infringers of the Iviewit technologies, licensing Warner Bros et al.
Proskauer, after learning of my technologies value, estimated at a trillion dollars to “priceless” by leading engineers at Real 3D, Inc. and without a patent department at the time in 1998, then rushed to acquire Rubenstein and his Meltzer patent group and the MPEGLA LLC pools.
When the acquisition was complete, Proskauer, my former patent counsel, directly began inuring benefits from the stolen technologies via their new client MPEGLA LLC in their new Intellectual Property department created after learning of my inventions.
MPEGLA has now tied and bundled my inventions to their pools licensing schemes, converting the royalties from the technologies from Iviewit and through other anticompetitive tactics have kept Iviewit from market in classic RICO and Antitrust violations, including violations of Sherman and Clayton, as further defined in my Federal RICO and Antitrust Lawsuit exhibited already herein.
The SEC should note here that Warner Bros. et al. and many of those involved directly in these matters are also involved in DVD patent pooling schemes, including but not limited to, DVD6C Patent Pool[4].
Whereby, similar to MPEGLA LLC’s illegal use of my technologies, DVD6C has similarly tied and bundled my technologies to their pools licenses, excluding me from royalties and then inuring royalties from others from my technologies directly from their membership in the pool.
o The SEC should note that the only Meltzer Intellectual Property attorney not to transfer to Proskauer at the time of acquisition was a one Raymond Joao, who initially with Rubenstein was represented as a Proskauer partner and who took initial patent disclosures with Rubenstein.
In 1999-2000 it was learned that Raymond Joao was putting patents into his own name while sabotaging the Iviewit patents. Upon leaving Iviewit, Joao claimed publically that he had 90+ patents in his name and then went to work for Marc S. Dreier, recently prosecuted and convicted by the SEC for an alleged Ponzi scheme, as further evidenced later herein.
February 08, 2002 – Lamont letter to John D. Calkins (“Calkins”) ~ Senior Vice President New Media Business Development of Warner Bros., regarding stock issued to Warner Bros. employees Colter and Thagard for Advisory Board roles they accepted and also regarding their about face and breach of contracts.
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20020208%20Lamont%20to%20Calkins%20Warner%20Bros%20Re%20Colter%20and%20Thagard%20Advisory%20Board%20Stock.pdf
• February 20, 2002 – Calkins Letter to Lamont denying IP infringement and contract violations in utter denial of the facts and evidence, including the Signed License and Service Agreement, Signed NDA’s, letters from Warner Bros. employees citing violations of the NDA’s and more, already presented herein.
The SEC should note that opposite of Warner Bros. claim in the letter that Iviewit is creating a false record, it is instead Warner Bros. that attempts to create a false and misleading record of fact in the letter.
o http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20020220%20Calkins%20Letter%20to%20Lamont%20Warner%20Bros%20Wayne%20Smith.pdf
• February 27, 2002 – Lamont to Calkins about Warner Bros. Breach of Contracts, the SEC should note that while Lamont relies on the NDA, the February 15, 2001 SIGNED LICENSING AGREEMENT, illustrated above, also has strong language about IP rights concerning the Iviewit technologies that also are violated.
Also, take note, that at this time in 2002, Warner Bros. et al. knew of the breaches and formally was notified by Iviewit at that time of such breaches and therefore they should have begun accounting for the IP Liabilities at this time, if not earlier according to FASB accounting rules.
o http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20020227%20Lamont%20to%20Calkins%20Warner%20Bros%20Breach%20more.pdf
• March 05, 2002 – Smith letter to Lamont denying IP infringement and contract violations in utter denial of the facts and evidence, including the Signed License and Service Agreement, Signed NDA’s, letters from Warner Bros. employees citing violations of the NDA’s and more, already presented herein.
o http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20020305%20Wayne%20Smith%20Warner%20Bros%20Letter%20to%20Lamont%20Calkins.pdf
• November 20, 2002 - April 15, 2002 Letter by Lamont to Rubenstein Regarding Conversations with Warner Bros et al. presented to Rubenstein at his November 20, 2002 Deposition as already discussed herein.
o http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/Kenneth%20Rubenstein%20Deposition%20with%20Exhibits%20CERT.pdf
pages 3-9
Please note that the correspondence exhibited above refers to a notification issued to Warner Bros. at that time, which provided Warner Bros. et al. further notice at that time that Cease and Desist letters and threatened litigation would be forthcoming regarding the technology infringements.
Warner Bros. et al. already was given notice of Breach of Contracts regarding the Intellectual Properties in prior communiqués exhibited and these letters certainly cite specific liabilities Warner was aware of going forward.
Liabilities exist for Warner Bros et al. for their involvement in the alleged criminal RICO activities initially discovered from information partially uncovered by Warner Bros. et al. in 2001, as they were on the verge of pouring in $25 Million Dollars in investment capital to my companies.
When doing their due diligence on a $12 Million Dollar Private Placement with Wachovia Securities, corporate and intellectual property frauds were uncovered, including discoveries by Smith regarding the filed patents and Calkins regarding corporate fraud.
At that time, Warner Bros et al. employees and personnel became aware of fraud relating to both the patents filed with the US Patent Office and additional corporate fraud, additional to what Andersen had found on or about that time and this information was relayed to Iviewit by Colter on behalf of both Smith and Calkins.
Colter relayed that Warner Bros. et al. uncovered fraud, including fraudulent statements made by Proskauer Rose and Foley & Lardner, former Iviewit counsel, regarding statements made in the Wachovia Private Placement.
A Private Placement Memorandum that Proskauer circulated to potential Iviewit investors including Warner Bros. et al. These Securities Frauds contained in the Private Placement are also cause for further SEC investigation.
Per Colter, Warner Bros. et al. and Smith uncovered Intellectual Property Frauds involving fraudulent oaths to the US Patent Office and Worldwide Patent Authorities, which has in part led to suspension of my Intellectual Properties by the US Patent Commissioner pending investigations by the US Patent Office and the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
This series of events led to further uncovering Patent Fraud by my former counsel Proskauer Rose, Foley and Larder and Meltzer and others that are subject to several state, federal and international ongoing investigations and legal actions.
Investigations now include one by Harry I. Moatz (“Moatz”), Director of the United States Patent & Trademark Office – Office of Enrollment and Discipline (“OED”), charged with oversight of the Federal Patent Bar and patent attorney criminal issues.
Moatz confirmed that W. Palm Beach FBI Special Agent, Stephen Lucchesi had joined his investigation of FRAUD ON THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE.
Moatz also directed me to file claims of Fraud on the USPTO with the Commissioner of the US Patent Office which resulted in the exhibited herein patent suspensions.
Moatz assembled a team of Patent Office Officials to aid me in getting the Intellectual Properties ready for suspension while investigations proceeded, as he removed all prior counsel from access to the IP.
Per Colter, Calkin’s had found fraud involving a fraudulent billing lawsuit against the Iviewit companies by their counsel Proskauer Rose.
Prior to Calkin’s information Iviewit corporate officers, directors and management did not know about such lawsuit, except those now charged with the RICO crimes and therefore it was not disclosed by Proskauer Rose LLP or Iviewit Accountants to Wachovia Securities for their due diligence and therefore not reflected in the Private Placement.
It was later learned that the companies sued by Proskauer Rose were companies fraudulently set up by former counsel Proskauer Rose LLP and had Stolen Intellectual Properties in them, this was learned from information discovered directly from the US Patent Office OED Investigations.
Whereby, Arthur Andersen on or about this time, while auditing the Iviewit companies for the largest investor Crossbow Ventures of West Palm Beach Florida, whose investment funds were two-thirds SBA SBIC funds found identical and similarly named companies to the Iviewit companies.
The Fraud involving the stolen Small Business Administration Funds is under ongoing investigation with the SBA Inspector General’s office and others.
Per Colter, Smith discovered Fraud involving Kenneth Rubenstein, a Proskauer Rose law firm partner and sole patent evaluator for one of the largest infringers and criminal suspects in my Federal RICO and Antitrust Lawsuit.
Kenneth Rubenstein is under investigation with other attorneys by Moatz and was also ordered for investigation by unanimous consent of five justices of the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department for Conflicts and the Appearance of Impropriety for violating public offices to block complaints I filed against him.
Where later, after discovery of the Intellectual Property fraudulent filings, it was learned that Smith, IP counsel for Warner Bros. was working with Kenneth Rubenstein ( Iviewit Patent Counsel, MPEGLA Counsel and Warner Bros. Counsel ) and that their relationship somehow now precluded Kenneth Rubenstein from re-opining on his prior opinion of the patents for Warner Bros. employees as already evidenced herein.
Whereby Warner Bros. then breached their contracts and began illegally using and licensing the technologies to others in violation of those binding signed agreements.
The MPEGLA LLC patent pooling scheme created and overseen by Counsel Rubenstein is merely an artifice to defraud inventors and has illegally precluded me from market in classic antitrust activities, including death threats and a car bomb.
Whereby the DVD Patent Pooling Schemes that Warner Bros. is directly involved in have also used the technologies in violation of signed contracts and agreements, admittedly, yet since that time they too have excluded Iviewit from market, again in classic antitrust activities and not only failed to pay Iviewit royalties but have failed to account for the 10 year Massive Liabilities.
The SEC should note that while there is a long gap in time between these prior Iviewit and Warner Bros et al., communications and contracts and the current contact to notify them again of liabilities resulting from the IP infringement and the newer Lawsuit liabilities, that during the gap I was actively pursuing my rights.
I have given similar information to several investigators and courts over the several years in between communications regarding Warner Bros. et al. involvement in the Iviewit allegations in my Federal RICO Lawsuit.
During the time, I was also forced to flee my home several times for my family’s safety, including from death threats from Mr. Brian Utley on behalf of the law firms Proskauer Rose and Foley & Lardner and then from actual Attempted Murder of my family. Attempted Murder through a Car Bombing of my family minivan in Del Ray Beach, FL., images of the Car Bombing can be found on the www.iviewit.tv [5] homepage.
Eliot Bernstein... Information to be found at http://www.iviewit.tv/
More Details on the Iviewit Case at www.Iviewit.TV
Showing posts with label RICO Complaint. Show all posts
Showing posts with label RICO Complaint. Show all posts
Wednesday, February 3, 2010
Friday, January 8, 2010
CBIZ, Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C. Sure has Taken on a Huges Liability and VERY Bad PR.
With the Proven involvement of Goldstein Lewin & Company in the Trillion Dollar Stolen Patent Case, for Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C.- it is quite Shocking to read the Following Press Real On CBIZ Acquires Goldstein Lewin & Co. - Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C. announced the acquisition of the attest business of Goldstein Lewin & Company. Why would you Knowingly buy into a RICO Lawsuit - unless Gerald R. Lewin - Jerry Lewin of Goldstein Lewin & Company failed to Disclose this Liablity.
In a Way I guess it is Good that CBIZ, Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C. and Steven L. Gerard are assuming this Liability this way Jerry Lewin won't have to take on a Trillion Dollar Liability alone.
I Guess CBIZ, Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C.does not mind
a Trillion Dollar Liability on the Books.
Here is the Article
"" A FULL-SERVICE ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL SERVICES PROVIDER
CLEVELAND, Jan. 4 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- CBIZ, Inc. CBZ today announced the acquisition of the non-attest business of Goldstein Lewin & Company, one of the largest South Florida accounting and financial services provider in Boca Raton, Florida, effective January 1, 2010. Concurrent with this transaction, Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C. announced the acquisition of the attest business of Goldstein Lewin & Company.
CBIZ, Inc. and Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C. have an alternative practice structure.
The two companies are separate and independent legal entities that work together to serve clients' business needs.
Founded in 1975, Goldstein Lewin & Co. provides a broad spectrum of services including tax planning and compliance, wealth preservation and estate planning, technology consulting, software consulting, accounting, auditing, business valuation and litigation consulting.
Goldstein Lewin & Co. has 85 associates and recorded approximately $13.7 million in revenue during the past twelve months.
CBIZ will integrate and co-locate its existing financial services office based in Boca Raton with Goldstein Lewin which will strengthen the Company's presence in the South Florida market.
As a result, the Company expects to record a restructuring charge of approximately $1.4 million before tax during 2010 in connection with this integration. Including the impact of this one-time non-cash charge, it is anticipated that this transaction will be accretive to earnings in 2010.
Steven L. Gerard, CBIZ Chairman and CEO, stated, "Goldstein Lewin has been an integral part of the South Florida community for over 30 years with an outstanding reputation for client service and technical expertise.
We look forward to welcoming Jerry Lewin and his highly regarded team to CBIZ. With the combination of Goldstein Lewin and our existing office in Boca Raton in addition to our Miami-based operations, CBIZ will be one of the largest accounting services providers in South Florida."
Commenting on becoming part of the CBIZ organization, Jerry Lewin stated, "We are very excited for our associates and our clients to take our business to the next level. We look forward to joining CBIZ and having the opportunity better serve our clients with the additional resources and expertise that the CBIZ organization can provide."
CBIZ, Inc. provides professional business services that help clients better manage their finances, employees and technology. As one of the largest benefits specialists and one of the largest accounting, valuation and medical practice management companies in the United States, CBIZ provides its clients with financial services including accounting and tax, internal audit, merger and acquisition advisory, and valuation. Employee services include group benefits, property and casualty insurance, payroll, HR consulting and wealth management. CBIZ also provides information technology, hardware and software solutions, healthcare consulting and medical practice management. These services are provided through more than 140 Company offices in 36 states.
Forward-looking statements in this release are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected. Such risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, the Company's ability to adequately manage its growth; the Company's dependence on the current trend of outsourcing business services; the Company's dependence on the services of its CEO and other key employees; competitive pricing pressures; general business and economic conditions; and changes in governmental regulation and tax laws affecting its insurance business or its business services operations. A more detailed description of such risks and uncertainties may be found in the Company's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
For further information regarding CBIZ, call our Investor Relations Office at (216) 447-9000 or visit our web site at www.cbiz.com .
SOURCE CBIZ, Inc.
http://news.moneycentral.msn.com/category/topicarticle.aspx?feed=PR&Date=20100104&ID=10953996&topic=TOPIC_MERGERS_ACQUISITIONS&isub=1
Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C. CBIZ, Goldstein and Lewin Co., RICO Complaint, RICO Lawsuit,Steven L. Gerard, Gerald R. Lewin,
In a Way I guess it is Good that CBIZ, Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C. and Steven L. Gerard are assuming this Liability this way Jerry Lewin won't have to take on a Trillion Dollar Liability alone.
I Guess CBIZ, Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C.does not mind
a Trillion Dollar Liability on the Books.
Here is the Article
"" A FULL-SERVICE ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL SERVICES PROVIDER
CLEVELAND, Jan. 4 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- CBIZ, Inc. CBZ today announced the acquisition of the non-attest business of Goldstein Lewin & Company, one of the largest South Florida accounting and financial services provider in Boca Raton, Florida, effective January 1, 2010. Concurrent with this transaction, Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C. announced the acquisition of the attest business of Goldstein Lewin & Company.
CBIZ, Inc. and Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C. have an alternative practice structure.
The two companies are separate and independent legal entities that work together to serve clients' business needs.
Founded in 1975, Goldstein Lewin & Co. provides a broad spectrum of services including tax planning and compliance, wealth preservation and estate planning, technology consulting, software consulting, accounting, auditing, business valuation and litigation consulting.
Goldstein Lewin & Co. has 85 associates and recorded approximately $13.7 million in revenue during the past twelve months.
CBIZ will integrate and co-locate its existing financial services office based in Boca Raton with Goldstein Lewin which will strengthen the Company's presence in the South Florida market.
As a result, the Company expects to record a restructuring charge of approximately $1.4 million before tax during 2010 in connection with this integration. Including the impact of this one-time non-cash charge, it is anticipated that this transaction will be accretive to earnings in 2010.
Steven L. Gerard, CBIZ Chairman and CEO, stated, "Goldstein Lewin has been an integral part of the South Florida community for over 30 years with an outstanding reputation for client service and technical expertise.
We look forward to welcoming Jerry Lewin and his highly regarded team to CBIZ. With the combination of Goldstein Lewin and our existing office in Boca Raton in addition to our Miami-based operations, CBIZ will be one of the largest accounting services providers in South Florida."
Commenting on becoming part of the CBIZ organization, Jerry Lewin stated, "We are very excited for our associates and our clients to take our business to the next level. We look forward to joining CBIZ and having the opportunity better serve our clients with the additional resources and expertise that the CBIZ organization can provide."
CBIZ, Inc. provides professional business services that help clients better manage their finances, employees and technology. As one of the largest benefits specialists and one of the largest accounting, valuation and medical practice management companies in the United States, CBIZ provides its clients with financial services including accounting and tax, internal audit, merger and acquisition advisory, and valuation. Employee services include group benefits, property and casualty insurance, payroll, HR consulting and wealth management. CBIZ also provides information technology, hardware and software solutions, healthcare consulting and medical practice management. These services are provided through more than 140 Company offices in 36 states.
Forward-looking statements in this release are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected. Such risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, the Company's ability to adequately manage its growth; the Company's dependence on the current trend of outsourcing business services; the Company's dependence on the services of its CEO and other key employees; competitive pricing pressures; general business and economic conditions; and changes in governmental regulation and tax laws affecting its insurance business or its business services operations. A more detailed description of such risks and uncertainties may be found in the Company's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
For further information regarding CBIZ, call our Investor Relations Office at (216) 447-9000 or visit our web site at www.cbiz.com .
SOURCE CBIZ, Inc.
http://news.moneycentral.msn.com/category/topicarticle.aspx?feed=PR&Date=20100104&ID=10953996&topic=TOPIC_MERGERS_ACQUISITIONS&isub=1
Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C. CBIZ, Goldstein and Lewin Co., RICO Complaint, RICO Lawsuit,Steven L. Gerard, Gerald R. Lewin,
Tuesday, January 5, 2010
MPEGLA LLC - Sony - Columbia University - Fujitsu Limited - Lucent Technologies Inc. - Matsushita - Mitsubishi - Philips - Scientific Atlanta
Columbia University; Fujitsu Limited; General Instrument Corp; Lucent Technologies Inc.; Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.; Mitsubishi Electric Corp.; Philips Electronics N.V. (Philips); Scientific Atlanta, Inc.; Sony Corp. (Sony);
EXTENDED LIST OF MPEGLA LICENSEES AND LICENSORS; any other John Doe MPEGLA, LLC. Partner, Associate, Engineer, Of Counsel or Employee; any other John Doe ("John Doe") MPEGLA, LLC partners, affiliates, companies, known or not known at this time; including but not limited to MPEGLA, LLC and any other MPEGLA, LLC related or affiliated entities both individually and professionally.
Hereinafter, collectively referred to as ("MPEGLA").
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/rico/CRIME%20ORG%20CHARTS%201.htm
MPEGLA LLC
EXTENDED LIST OF MPEGLA LICENSEES AND LICENSORS; any other John Doe MPEGLA, LLC. Partner, Associate, Engineer, Of Counsel or Employee; any other John Doe ("John Doe") MPEGLA, LLC partners, affiliates, companies, known or not known at this time; including but not limited to MPEGLA, LLC and any other MPEGLA, LLC related or affiliated entities both individually and professionally.
Hereinafter, collectively referred to as ("MPEGLA").
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/rico/CRIME%20ORG%20CHARTS%201.htm
MPEGLA LLC
RICO Complaint against Florida State Bar and Florida Supreme Court - Lorraine Hoffman - Eric Turner - Matthew Triggs - John Boggs
"" Lorraine Christine Hoffman - ("Hoffman"); Eric Turner - ("Turner"); Kenneth Marvin - ("Marvin"); Anthony Boggs - ("Boggs"); Joy A. Bartmon - ("Bartmon"); Kelly Overstreet Johnson - ("Johnson"); Jerald Beer - ("Beer"); Triggs; Wheeler; any other John Doe ("John Doe") The Florida Bar staff, known or not known to have been involved at the time. Hereinafter, collectively referred to as ("TFB") ""
SUPREME COURT JUSTICES
LORRAINE HOFFMAN,
ERIC TURNER,
JOHN BOGGS,
KELLY OVERSTREET JOHNSON,
JOY BARTMON,
GERALD BEERS,
KENNETH MARVIN,
MATTHEW TRIGGS and
CHRISTOPHER WHEELER "
Contributory Antitrust Violations
Facilitates RICO Violations
VIOLATIONS OF THE RULES REGULATING THE FLORIDA BAR
VIOLATIONS OF THE CODE OF PROFESSIONAL REGULATION
VIOLATIONS OF PUBLIC OFFICES
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
IMPROPRIETY
OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE
FAILURE TO FILE CHARGES AGAINST PUBLIC OFFICER
CAUGHT IN CONFLICT OF INTEREST AND VIOLATIONS OF PUBLIC OFFICE -
MATTHEW TRIGGS & KELLY OVERSTREET JOHNSON
OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE - DOCUMENT DESTRUCTION
OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE -
FAILURE TO DOCKET COMPLAINTS AGAINST
TRIGGS, WHEELER, TURNER & HOFFMAN
OBSTRUCTIONS OF JUSTICE
FAILURE TO FOLLOW JUDICIAL CANNONS ""
Source of Post
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/rico/THE%20FLORIDA%20BAR.htm
Florida Bar Complaints
FORMER IVIEWIT MANAGEMENT & BOARD
Brian G. Utley/Proskauer Referred Management - ("Utley");
Raymond Hersh - ("Hersh")/; Michael Reale - ("Reale")/
Proskauer Referred Management; Rubenstein/Proskauer Rose - Advisory Board;
Wheeler/Proskauer Rose - Advisory Board; Dick/Foley & Lardner - Advisory Board, Boehm/Foley & Lardner - Advisory Board; Becker/Foley & Lardner; Advisory Board;
Joao/Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolfe & Schlissel - Advisory Board; Kane/Goldman Sachs - Board Director; Lewin/Goldstein Lewin - Board Director;
Prolow/Tiedemann Prolow II - Board Director; Powell/Crossbow Ventures/Proskauer Referred Investor - Board Director; Buchsbaum - Board Director; Warner - Board Director; any other John Doe ("John Doe") Former Iviewit Management & Board partners, affiliates, companies, known or not known at this time; including but not limited to Former Iviewit Management & Board and any other Former Iviewit Management & Board related or affiliated entities both individually and professionally.
So Much Proof Piles up ... Thousands of Documents, So Much Proof and our US Justice System Find a way to Screw the The Small Business in Favor Of Corrupt Attorneys, Corporate Greed, Political Agendas, and HUGE IT Companies insatiable desire for Technology.
Raymond Hersh - ("Hersh")/; Michael Reale - ("Reale")/
Proskauer Referred Management; Rubenstein/Proskauer Rose - Advisory Board;
Wheeler/Proskauer Rose - Advisory Board; Dick/Foley & Lardner - Advisory Board, Boehm/Foley & Lardner - Advisory Board; Becker/Foley & Lardner; Advisory Board;
Joao/Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolfe & Schlissel - Advisory Board; Kane/Goldman Sachs - Board Director; Lewin/Goldstein Lewin - Board Director;
Prolow/Tiedemann Prolow II - Board Director; Powell/Crossbow Ventures/Proskauer Referred Investor - Board Director; Buchsbaum - Board Director; Warner - Board Director; any other John Doe ("John Doe") Former Iviewit Management & Board partners, affiliates, companies, known or not known at this time; including but not limited to Former Iviewit Management & Board and any other Former Iviewit Management & Board related or affiliated entities both individually and professionally.
So Much Proof Piles up ... Thousands of Documents, So Much Proof and our US Justice System Find a way to Screw the The Small Business in Favor Of Corrupt Attorneys, Corporate Greed, Political Agendas, and HUGE IT Companies insatiable desire for Technology.
René P. Eichenberger, Matthew Shaw - Crossbow Ventures™ / Alpine Partners
" Stephen J. Warner - ("Warner"); René P. Eichenberger - ("Eichenberger"); H. Hickman “Hank” Powell - ("Powell"); Maurice Buchsbaum - ("Buchsbaum"); Eric Chen - ("Chen"); Avi Hersh; Matthew Shaw - ("Shaw"); Bruce W. Shewmaker - ("Shewmaker"); Ravi M. Ugale - ("Ugale"); any other John Doe ("John Doe") Crossbow Ventures™ / Alpine Partners partners, affiliates, companies, known or not known at this time; including but not limited to Crossbow Ventures™ / Alpine Partners and any other Crossbow Ventures™ / Alpine Partners related or affiliated entities both individually and professionally. Hereinafter, collectively referred to as ("Crossbow").
... Fraud Upon The United States Patent & Trademark Office
Fraud Upon The United States Copyright Office
Fraud Upon The Small Business Administration
Intellectual Property Theft
Fraud United States Patent & Trademark Office –
European Patent Office & Japan Patent Office
Anti-Trust
Direct Frauds: USPTO; EPO; JPO;
U.S. Postal, Wire Fraud; Iviewit Shareholder Fraud; Iviewit
Investor Fraud
SEC VIOLATIONS PRIVATE COMPANY RULES
Contributory Antitrust Violations
Continues/Redirects RICO Violations
Tortuous Interference with Business Relationships
Breach of ContractMisappropriation and Conversion of Funds
Breach of Fiduciary Duties as Officer and Board Director
Tortuous Interference with Business Contracts
AOLTW/WB - ENCODING DEAL, LICENSE $25,000,000
SONY – MOVIE LINK/HARDWARE APPS
PARAMOUNT PICTURES
CROSSBOW VENTURES/SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
HOLLYWOOD.COM
WACHOVIA PRIVATE PLACEMENT MEMORANDUM ""
Source
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/rico/CROSSBOW.htm
René P. Eichenberger, Matthew Shaw,
Crossbow Ventures, Alpine Partners
... Fraud Upon The United States Patent & Trademark Office
Fraud Upon The United States Copyright Office
Fraud Upon The Small Business Administration
Intellectual Property Theft
Fraud United States Patent & Trademark Office –
European Patent Office & Japan Patent Office
Anti-Trust
Direct Frauds: USPTO; EPO; JPO;
U.S. Postal, Wire Fraud; Iviewit Shareholder Fraud; Iviewit
Investor Fraud
SEC VIOLATIONS PRIVATE COMPANY RULES
Contributory Antitrust Violations
Continues/Redirects RICO Violations
Tortuous Interference with Business Relationships
Breach of ContractMisappropriation and Conversion of Funds
Breach of Fiduciary Duties as Officer and Board Director
Tortuous Interference with Business Contracts
AOLTW/WB - ENCODING DEAL, LICENSE $25,000,000
SONY – MOVIE LINK/HARDWARE APPS
PARAMOUNT PICTURES
CROSSBOW VENTURES/SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
HOLLYWOOD.COM
WACHOVIA PRIVATE PLACEMENT MEMORANDUM ""
Source
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/rico/CROSSBOW.htm
René P. Eichenberger, Matthew Shaw,
Crossbow Ventures, Alpine Partners
INTEL, Real 3d, Inc. (SILICON GRAPHICS, INC., LOCKHEED MARTIN & INTEL) and RYJO
" Gerald Stanley - ("Stanley"); Ryan Huisman - ("Huisman"); RYJO - ("RYJO"); Tim Connolly - ("Connolly"); Steve Cochran; David Bolton; Rosalie Bibona - ("Bibona"); Connie Martin; Richard Gentner; Steven A. Behrens; Matt Johannsen; any other John Doe ("John Doe") Intel, Real 3D, Inc. (Silicon Graphics, Inc., Lockheed Martin & Intel) & RYJO partners, affiliates, companies, known or not known at this time; including but not limited to Intel, Real 3D, Inc. (Silicon Graphics, Inc., Lockheed Martin & Intel) & RYJO; Employees, Corporations, Affiliates and any other Intel, Real 3D, Inc. (Silicon Graphics, Inc., Lockheed Martin & Intel) & RYJO related or affiliated entities both individually and professionally. Hereinafter, collectively referred to as ("Intel/R3D"). "
RICO Complaint
RICO Complaint
SCHIFFRIN and BARROWAY, ANDREW BARROWAY, KHRISNA NARINE and RICHARD SCHIFFRIN
SCHIFFRIN & BARROWAY
ANDREW BARROWAY,
RICHARD SCHIFFRIN
Fraud Upon The United States Patent & Trademark Office
Fraud Upon The Small Business Administration
Patent & Copyright Theft
Fraud; Iviewit Shareholder Fraud;
Iviewit Investor Fraud
Contributory Antitrust Violations
Continues/Redirects RICO Violations
Breach of Contract
Fraud Upon Civil Court Florida
Tortuous Interference with Business Contracts
AOLTW/WB - ENCODING DEAL, LICENSE $25,000,000
SONY – MOVIE LINK/HARDWARE APPS
PARAMOUNT PICTURES
CROSSBOW VENTURES/
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
HOLLYWOOD.COM
WACHOVIA PRIVATE PLACEMENT MEMORANDUM ""
Source and Full Document
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/rico/SCHIFFRIN%20&%20BARROWAY.htm
RICHARD SCHIFFRIN
Thursday, December 31, 2009
Intel IBM Lockheed SGI in TRILLION DOLLAR FEDERAL RICO/INFRINGEMENT LAWSUIT
Posted Wednesday 23rd December 2009 17:50 GMT
In FTC whacks Intel with anticompetition complaint
IBM has a history of WAR CRIMES?
Currently they are being sued in Federal US District Court Judge Shira Scheindlin's court for Aparthied related WAR CRIMES. IBM's role, same as their role in WWII, giving machines to tabulate the loot from victims and track their blood lines to hunt and kill their bloodlines.
Little known fact is that IBM had their employees in every single NAZI concentration camp, yes, somebody needs to count the gold fillings and how many were burned, hanged, shot, showered (gased).
Now for the scary part, their software is involved I believe with Lockheed to be controlling the US Census data collection. Buyer be beware.
PS - on a final note, IBM Intel Lockheed SGI are also in a 12-count, 12-trillion dollar lawsuit, boy I hope they are accounting for it on their books, relating to their role in stealing technologies from Inventor Eliot Bernstein of Iviewit Technologies and others. According to FASB No 5, both liabilities need to be accounted for but they are not.
If you own IBM shares you may have rescissory rights dating back to 1999.
Also may be concerned that the LAWSUIT has been marked legally "RELATED" to an inside Whistleblower lawsuit by Judge Scheindlin.
Intel is also involved as a Defendant in the Lawsuit for more information on Intel’s involvement see SEC Complaint exposing possible financial crimes relating to FASB No 5 accounting rules and more @ http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20090306%20Intel%20Demand%20Letter%20&%20Liability%20Exposure%20%20Signed%203549l.pdf (note Bruce Sewell who letter is addressed to with Paul Otellini, just left longtime Intel job for Apple, wonder if Apple knows of his baggage) and
http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=234
08-4873-cv United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Docket - Bernstein, et al. v Appellate Division First Department Disciplinary Committee, et al. - TRILLION DOLLAR LAWSUIT
Cases @ US District Court - Southern District NY
(07cv09599) Anderson v The State of New York, et al. - WHISTLEBLOWER LAWSUIT
(07cv11196) Bernstein, et al. v Appellate Division
First Department Disciplinary Committee, et al.
(07cv11612) Esposito v The State of New York, et al.,
(08cv00526) Capogrosso v New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct, et al.,
(08cv02391) McKeown v The State of New York, et al.,
(08cv02852) Galison v The State of New York, et al.,
(08cv03305) Carvel v The State of New York, et al., and,
(08cv4053) Gizella Weisshaus v The State of New York, et al.
(08cv4438) Suzanne McCormick v The State of New York, et al.
Related cases by judge
(08 cv 6368) John L. Petrec-Tolino v. The State of New York
Eliot I. Bernstein
Source of Post
http://forums.theregister.co.uk/user/38893/
In FTC whacks Intel with anticompetition complaint
IBM has a history of WAR CRIMES?
Currently they are being sued in Federal US District Court Judge Shira Scheindlin's court for Aparthied related WAR CRIMES. IBM's role, same as their role in WWII, giving machines to tabulate the loot from victims and track their blood lines to hunt and kill their bloodlines.
Little known fact is that IBM had their employees in every single NAZI concentration camp, yes, somebody needs to count the gold fillings and how many were burned, hanged, shot, showered (gased).
Now for the scary part, their software is involved I believe with Lockheed to be controlling the US Census data collection. Buyer be beware.
PS - on a final note, IBM Intel Lockheed SGI are also in a 12-count, 12-trillion dollar lawsuit, boy I hope they are accounting for it on their books, relating to their role in stealing technologies from Inventor Eliot Bernstein of Iviewit Technologies and others. According to FASB No 5, both liabilities need to be accounted for but they are not.
If you own IBM shares you may have rescissory rights dating back to 1999.
Also may be concerned that the LAWSUIT has been marked legally "RELATED" to an inside Whistleblower lawsuit by Judge Scheindlin.
Intel is also involved as a Defendant in the Lawsuit for more information on Intel’s involvement see SEC Complaint exposing possible financial crimes relating to FASB No 5 accounting rules and more @ http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20090306%20Intel%20Demand%20Letter%20&%20Liability%20Exposure%20%20Signed%203549l.pdf (note Bruce Sewell who letter is addressed to with Paul Otellini, just left longtime Intel job for Apple, wonder if Apple knows of his baggage) and
http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=234
08-4873-cv United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Docket - Bernstein, et al. v Appellate Division First Department Disciplinary Committee, et al. - TRILLION DOLLAR LAWSUIT
Cases @ US District Court - Southern District NY
(07cv09599) Anderson v The State of New York, et al. - WHISTLEBLOWER LAWSUIT
(07cv11196) Bernstein, et al. v Appellate Division
First Department Disciplinary Committee, et al.
(07cv11612) Esposito v The State of New York, et al.,
(08cv00526) Capogrosso v New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct, et al.,
(08cv02391) McKeown v The State of New York, et al.,
(08cv02852) Galison v The State of New York, et al.,
(08cv03305) Carvel v The State of New York, et al., and,
(08cv4053) Gizella Weisshaus v The State of New York, et al.
(08cv4438) Suzanne McCormick v The State of New York, et al.
Related cases by judge
(08 cv 6368) John L. Petrec-Tolino v. The State of New York
Eliot I. Bernstein
Source of Post
http://forums.theregister.co.uk/user/38893/
Thursday, December 24, 2009
Thefts of the companies intellectual property by our Patent Attorneys and the hosts of other crimes committed in the attempt to cover it up..
from www.Iviewit.TV
"Information pertaining to the thefts of the companies intellectual property by our patent attorneys and the hosts of other crimes committed in the attempt to cover it up through abuse of public offices.
Abuses elevating to state supreme court public offices of The Florida Bar and Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division First & Second Department Disciplinary Committees. To evade prosecution partners were planted in conflict to handle complaints in conflict while holding public office and stymie the company's efforts.
The same attorneys remain under federal investigations by the patent office and other regulatory bodies and where such investigations have caused the Commissioner of Patents to suspend the Iviewit patent applications, pending charges of fraud on the United States Patent and Trademark Office, as well as, fraud upon the Iviewit shareholders.
Investigations are underway into the stolen investment funds of the company including monies from the federally backed Small Business Administration.
Iviewit has spent several years building its case against our former attorneys, accountants and management and would have had far more success if conflicts of interests, abuses of public offices and other nefarious crimes to cover up and deny due process had not interfered with the company complaints to authorities.
In not one, but two states, Supreme Court agencies have been penetrated by Proskauer partners acting in violation of office positions to block complaints against them and their partners. As the case elevated to the United States Supreme Court for review of the Florida case for violation of public offices by Christopher Wheeler and Matthew Triggs, the Supreme Court would not review the case.
The Florida Supreme Court and then the United States Supreme Court by failing to review the matters, precluded Iviewit shareholders from filing complaints against the attorney's caught in verified conflicts of interest and abuse of public office.
Thus, the state and United States Supreme Court's by denying Iviewit to file complaints, as provided for in the Florida and United States constitution's has denied shareholders the right to file complaints against public officers and attorney's Wheeler and Matthew Triggs for their violations of Florida Supreme Court public offices.
Turning the courts into an attorney protection agency along with the state bar associations, these institutions appear to fail constitutional mandates that allow citizens to complain against public officers caught violating office. Our rights denied, it is feeling a bit Russian here and this is leading to more than just patent theft from the shareholders but now a denial of due process that may soon elevate into Patentgate.
Iviewit is an Intellectual Property (IP) asset management company focused on the development and extension of its "critical path" imaging & video processes into the marketplace.
Currently the companies patent portfolio is partially suspended (USPTO SUSPENSION LETTER) by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) Commissioner, pending investigation of charges of (FILING OF CHARGES OF FRAUD UPON THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE CHARGES FILED BY IVIEWIT AND CROSSBOW VENTURES).
Where the filings claim that Iviewit former patent counsel and others have committed fraud not only against the Iviewit shareholders but fraud upon the USPTO directly in filing fraudulent and false statements of oaths on patent applications.
Additionally there are other crimes to attempt to steal such inventions, inventions that have been heralded by leading experts as the Holy Grail inventions of our times.
The charges were filed by Iviewit and it's largest investor, Crossbow Ventures of West Palm Beach, FL, after information from the Director of the Office of Enrollment and Discipline (OED) for the USPTO, Harry I. Moatz (Moatz) showed that foul play appears to have taken place in the filings by the attorneys. Subsequently the attorneys and firms involved, including (Proskauer Rose LLP, Foley and Lardner, Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolfe and Schlissel, Blakely Sokoloff Zafman and Taylor, Kenneth Rubenstein, Raymond Joao, William Dick, Steven Becker, Christopher Wheeler and Douglas Boehm) are under investigation by Moatz and the USPTO for such crimes.
Crossbow Ventures monies invested were also two-thirds funded by the federally backed Small Business Administration (SBA) where the SBA is in fact the largest shareholder in the iviewit intellectual properties.
The SBA is the most financially damaged shareholder by their crimes. Where the SBA Inspector General's Offices has begun to audit the trail of their monies and where their investment in the patents went.
All Iviewit shareholders should be aware that the companies board closed the company with no notice to shareholders that they were disbanding the corporate entities. This appears to violate laws in Deleware and Florida.
These crimes and many other has been reported to the Federal Bureau of Investigation, where Special Agent Stephen Luchessi has taken these matters to the United States Attorney approximately one year ago.
We have asked for filing under RICO with the FBI as these crimes involved a number of law firms and others, acting in concert to and violating enough of laws that qualify for RICO status. We suggest that you write to your congressional leaders regarding your stock, how to report it and what actions are being taken to direct the patents and stock back into your names.
Already, as most shareholders are aware the stocks maybe worth several thousand times their original value. Please contact the company if you would like to know the current status of investigations and whom to write in your state. The Company has filed for Congressional help with The Honorable United States Senator Dianne Feinstein of California. "
Source of this Post
http://www.iviewit.tv/about/index.htm
stolen patent kenneth rubenstein
"Information pertaining to the thefts of the companies intellectual property by our patent attorneys and the hosts of other crimes committed in the attempt to cover it up through abuse of public offices.
Abuses elevating to state supreme court public offices of The Florida Bar and Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division First & Second Department Disciplinary Committees. To evade prosecution partners were planted in conflict to handle complaints in conflict while holding public office and stymie the company's efforts.
The same attorneys remain under federal investigations by the patent office and other regulatory bodies and where such investigations have caused the Commissioner of Patents to suspend the Iviewit patent applications, pending charges of fraud on the United States Patent and Trademark Office, as well as, fraud upon the Iviewit shareholders.
Investigations are underway into the stolen investment funds of the company including monies from the federally backed Small Business Administration.
Iviewit has spent several years building its case against our former attorneys, accountants and management and would have had far more success if conflicts of interests, abuses of public offices and other nefarious crimes to cover up and deny due process had not interfered with the company complaints to authorities.
In not one, but two states, Supreme Court agencies have been penetrated by Proskauer partners acting in violation of office positions to block complaints against them and their partners. As the case elevated to the United States Supreme Court for review of the Florida case for violation of public offices by Christopher Wheeler and Matthew Triggs, the Supreme Court would not review the case.
The Florida Supreme Court and then the United States Supreme Court by failing to review the matters, precluded Iviewit shareholders from filing complaints against the attorney's caught in verified conflicts of interest and abuse of public office.
Thus, the state and United States Supreme Court's by denying Iviewit to file complaints, as provided for in the Florida and United States constitution's has denied shareholders the right to file complaints against public officers and attorney's Wheeler and Matthew Triggs for their violations of Florida Supreme Court public offices.
Turning the courts into an attorney protection agency along with the state bar associations, these institutions appear to fail constitutional mandates that allow citizens to complain against public officers caught violating office. Our rights denied, it is feeling a bit Russian here and this is leading to more than just patent theft from the shareholders but now a denial of due process that may soon elevate into Patentgate.
Iviewit is an Intellectual Property (IP) asset management company focused on the development and extension of its "critical path" imaging & video processes into the marketplace.
Currently the companies patent portfolio is partially suspended (USPTO SUSPENSION LETTER) by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) Commissioner, pending investigation of charges of (FILING OF CHARGES OF FRAUD UPON THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE CHARGES FILED BY IVIEWIT AND CROSSBOW VENTURES).
Where the filings claim that Iviewit former patent counsel and others have committed fraud not only against the Iviewit shareholders but fraud upon the USPTO directly in filing fraudulent and false statements of oaths on patent applications.
Additionally there are other crimes to attempt to steal such inventions, inventions that have been heralded by leading experts as the Holy Grail inventions of our times.
The charges were filed by Iviewit and it's largest investor, Crossbow Ventures of West Palm Beach, FL, after information from the Director of the Office of Enrollment and Discipline (OED) for the USPTO, Harry I. Moatz (Moatz) showed that foul play appears to have taken place in the filings by the attorneys. Subsequently the attorneys and firms involved, including (Proskauer Rose LLP, Foley and Lardner, Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolfe and Schlissel, Blakely Sokoloff Zafman and Taylor, Kenneth Rubenstein, Raymond Joao, William Dick, Steven Becker, Christopher Wheeler and Douglas Boehm) are under investigation by Moatz and the USPTO for such crimes.
Crossbow Ventures monies invested were also two-thirds funded by the federally backed Small Business Administration (SBA) where the SBA is in fact the largest shareholder in the iviewit intellectual properties.
The SBA is the most financially damaged shareholder by their crimes. Where the SBA Inspector General's Offices has begun to audit the trail of their monies and where their investment in the patents went.
All Iviewit shareholders should be aware that the companies board closed the company with no notice to shareholders that they were disbanding the corporate entities. This appears to violate laws in Deleware and Florida.
These crimes and many other has been reported to the Federal Bureau of Investigation, where Special Agent Stephen Luchessi has taken these matters to the United States Attorney approximately one year ago.
We have asked for filing under RICO with the FBI as these crimes involved a number of law firms and others, acting in concert to and violating enough of laws that qualify for RICO status. We suggest that you write to your congressional leaders regarding your stock, how to report it and what actions are being taken to direct the patents and stock back into your names.
Already, as most shareholders are aware the stocks maybe worth several thousand times their original value. Please contact the company if you would like to know the current status of investigations and whom to write in your state. The Company has filed for Congressional help with The Honorable United States Senator Dianne Feinstein of California. "
Source of this Post
http://www.iviewit.tv/about/index.htm
stolen patent kenneth rubenstein
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)