Does Mary Shapiro SEC Boss, Know about the Iviewit Stolen Patent Case and Its HUGE Implications of Shareholders?

It seems from Many documents at www.iViewit.TV That Mary Sapiro of the SEC had knowledgle long ago about what Proskauer Rose was up to and yet .. what ?? the Standford affair is some NEW Shocker of a Story, yet Mary Shapiro had been given notice by Eliot Bernstein and the Iviewit Company years before the Billion Dollar Scandal hit the Main Stream Media.

Does Mary Shapiro or the SEC have ANY Liability to the Shareholders when they had advance knowledge of the Players and did nothing to prevent the Standford Affair?

$65 Billion in the Bernie Madoff Scheme is NOT all that Mary Shapiro and the SEC missed... What about the Standford Affair - Billions and Connected to Proskauer Rose. What About Enron and Proskauer Connections - and what about all the Players, Shareholder Fraud, and Liability that the Eliot Bernstein of the Iviewit Technologies Company has brought to Mary Shapiro and the SEC's Attention ?

What do they say, I just did not know or see this coming? So Sorry you Lost Billions - I had no Way of Knowing... well Crystal L. Cox, Investigative Blogger says.. "BULL, Mary Shapiro and the SEC knew" and they IGNORED leads, had no one seemingly watching websites, reading documents, scouring blogs or even looking into leads that led to BILLIONS of Innocent Investors losing their Money.

The SEC has no purpose that is really beneficial and in my Opinion is just as susceptible as being Bought Off as anyone other Corrupt Government Agent, Attorney, CEO or Judge" .

Won't it be Amusing when Warner Brothers, Intel Corp., Sony, AOL, and all those Billion Dollar Tech Companies go Belly up and take the Shareholders to Bankruptcy because of the Contracts they signed and did not fulfill with the Iviewit Technologies Company that puts them in Connection and at least in part Liable for a Trillion Dollar Liability that they SEEM to have overlooked on their Books with all their bragging of Profits this quarter... blah .. blah.. blah.. and what Does Mary Shapiro Say? Is she even Acknowledging any of it?

Won't it be Hysterically when the SEC, when Mary Shapiro says to the Warner Brothers, AOL, Intel Corp, Sony ... Shareholders that Gee I just didn't see that Trillion Dollar HIT Coming.. We had no warning.. other then the years of complaints filed from the Iviewit Technologies Company in Which I IGNORED.. gee Sorry..

It is not Personal, it is Business,
Mary Schapiro - YOUR FIRED !!!..

posted By Investigative Blogger
Crystal L. Cox...
Crystal Cox
More on the Obvious, Blatant Shareholder Fraud among tons of Major Tech Companies.. and the Iviewit Stolen Patent Story at www.DeniedPatent.com and at www.Iviewit.TV over a thousand documents of Proof So Far.
Mary Shapiro
Research Links on Mary Shapiro and her Knowledge of possible Shareholder Fraud in which, to me it looks like she did nothing, and well Billions upon Billions are lost by innocent Investors. And the Potention of Trillions More...

http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20090325%20SEC%20FAX%20Cover%20Page.pdf

http://www.trialbyblog.com/2010/01/eliot-i-bernstein-intel-corporation-sec.html

http://www.free-press-release.com/news-iviewit-trillion-fed-suit-defendant-proskauer-rose-sued-in-global-class-action-re-stanford-ponzi-1252249099.html

http://seekingalpha.com/user/478415/comments/highest-rated

http://www.stolenpatent.com/2010_01_01_archive.html


Gee Sorry ... NO One Brought it to My Attention: I just Did not See ANY sign of this COMING... What a Crock that Will BE..

Crystal Cox Blogger

Invest in SONY? Is it time to buy or Dump Sony Stocks... Well Take a Look.. Savvy Investor.

Take a Look at www.Iviewit.TV - Scour this Site and Think Again. When Sony finally admits to the Trillion Dollar Liability that have not been reporting to Shareholders well my guess is all hell is going to break loose.

When is the Next Sony Shareholder Meeting and do they have a Clue about the Iviewit Liability?

Time Warner - WBOL - Fraud Against Shareholders, Lies about Liability and NOT honoring Contracts, Why?

Why Did the SEC allow Warner Brothers to Split off Aol after they wre warned of a Trillion Dollar Liability that they would certainly be responsible for Some if not all the Damages?

So We have Bills that Show every Charge for the Entire Process of setting up and Supposedly Executing these Contracts such as the one Below.

2001 08 29 - Irell & Manella bill for AOL license agreement they drafted.

yet AOL was allowed to Split from WBOL, and Warner Bros. Is NOT being MADE to honor these Contracts, Why?

This is FRAUD against the Shareholders as AOL - Time Warner Inc. knew that this Major Liability was NOT accounted for on their Books. So why is Time Warner AOL still ignoring the Rights of the Iviewit Inventors, are they trying to hide assets... no matter how you look at it Time Warner - Time Warner, Warner Bros., WBOL,AOLTW, AOL, Time Warner Inc., Whatever name you have for them... they KNEW and did not share with shareholders a HUGE Debit on their Books.

There is Confidentiality Agreements, and So Much Evidence, All these Names and Players, Contracts, Bills and Still Warner Brothers acts like this Just Does NOT exist... hmmm...

There are BINDING term sheets from 2001 and Still WBOL ignores the rights of those they entered into contract with, WHY?

Warner Bros. Online Videos has NOT been honoring this Contract but using the Technology for around 8 Years now, and after Iviewit Sent them Disclosure of the Issue pending, they Split of AOL, and the SEC has no Issue with this?

Do Warner Brothers Shareholders have ANY issue with any of this ? I Guess they had better Start Considering it's Validity... any Time Now...

Click Here for Contracts and Information from 2001
that Seem to Have Slipped Warner Brothers Mind.

What Does Doug Shapiro, Michael Kopelman at Time Warner Inc. of Time Warner Investor Relations, Have to Say about all of this, I mean Come On are they Denying it Exists?
http://www.timewarner.com/corp/newsroom/pr/0,20812,1950229,00.html
"NEW YORK – Time Warner Inc. (NYSE: TWX) will report its 2009 fourth-quarter and full-year results on Wednesday, February 3, 2010, before the market opens. "

Boy Time Warner Inc. TWX - sure is Proud of what they have done...

More Links to Research This Topic

http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/Book/index.htm

www.Iviewit.TV

www.DeniedPatent.com

AOL, Time Warner Inc, Iviewit, SEC Fraud, Andrew Y. Choung, IRELL and Manella LLP,WBOL, Warner Bros. Online, Stock Tips

Time Warner Inc. - AOL - Withholding information from Shareholders that they have a Right to Know.

How Come AOL and Time Warner Inc. Shareholders still do not seem to know about the Trillion Dollar, at least in part - and a VERY big part is a Liability on the that is NOT reported on the AOL Time Warner Books?

Here we have Confidentiality Agreements Violated, Technology Stolen from Inventors, No Compensation to The Inventors. Time Warner Inc., AOL - they know that this Shareholder Fraud is Pending and that at some point they will have to pay for the Technology they STOLE.

Does the SEC not Care about a Liability this HUGE... look at www.DeniedPatent.com or www.Iviewit.TV and you can see thousands of Documents of Proof.

Did the SEC have any advance Notice all all of this?

Well from the Above sites you can see that the SEC did indeed know about what was going on and now the damage is mounting and still Time Warner Inc. - AOL - NYSE: TWX - Time Warner Cable Inc. -Warner Bros. they have Seemingly not disclosed this Liability to their Shareholders, in fact are they not in some sort of "Time Warner Declares Spin-Off Dividend Of AOL Shares Time Warner Inc. and AOL Inc. announced the timing and details regarding the spin-off of AOL from Time" From TimeWarner.com ? So another words they are restructuring their Company to attempt to protect themselves from this Trillion Dollar Liability without telling the Shareholders of TWX that it even exists.

Is That Legal?

"" Time Warner Inc. - AOL Separation Information On December 9, 2009, Time Warner Inc. completed the spin-off of AOL Inc. "" From the Link Below
http://ir.timewarner.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=70972&p=irol-irhome
Time Warner was Given Notice from Iviewit of this Trillion Dollar Liability and they Separated AOL after this - Folks, there is a Whole Lot More that Time Warner Inc. is NOT telling YOU.

There is No way that Time Warner Inc. Can Ever DENY that they knew the Liability from the Iviewit Stolen Patent, P. Stephen Lamont told them, Eliot Bernstein Told them, People within their own Company told them... there is Evidence on top of Evidence to PROOF that Warner Bros. Hid this Liability information from their Shareholders and denied Rights to the Iviewit Inventors. The Question is How Long with the shareholders stand for this and how long with the SEC Ignore this HUGE Liability that is NOT accounted For?

Links for You to Visit
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20090325%20SEC%20FAX%20Cover%20Page.pdf

http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=205

http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=209

http://74.125.155.132/search?q=cache:FgCCwCxMZuwJ:iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/2007%252008%252018%2520Cuomo%2520Letter%2520Final.doc+%22iviewit%22+%22Time+Warner%22&cd=5&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

http://74.125.155.132/search?q=cache:MviGXq-QONgJ:www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/2004%252012%252015%2520Letter%2520to%2520Thomas%2520Cahill%2520Re%2520Krane%2520Conflict.pdf+site:www.iviewit.tv+Time+Warner&cd=2&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/patent%20pool%20infringers.pdf?referer=www.clickfind.com.au

http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/Patents/Miscellaneous%20Patent%20Docs/2004%2003%2026%20Moatz%20letter%20to%20take%20time%20responding%20for%20complaint.pdf

http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/2004%2011%2015%20SC%2004-1078%20IVIEWIT%20REBUTTAL%20TO%20FLORIDA%20BAR%20RESP(1).pdf

http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/2004%2004%2021%20Director%20Officer%20Advisory%20Board%20and%20Professionals%20Letter%20of%20Liabilities%20email%20low.pdf
Letters of Liabilty

Broadcom, Apple, Nokia - Heads Up Intel Shareholders

" By MarketWatch
SAN FRANCISCO (MarketWatch) --

Among the shares expected to see active trade in Wednesday's session are those of Broadcom Corp., Apple Inc. and Nokia Corp.

Broadcom has agreed to settle a pending class action lawsuit against the company and certain of its current and former officers and directors.

The lawsuit, which is related to the company's historical stock-option accounting practices, was brought on behalf of investors who bought Broadcom's common shares between July 2005 and July 2006.

Under the proposed agreement, the claims against Broadcom and its officers will be dismissed in exchange for a $160.5 million cash payment by the company. Broadcom will record the settlement amount as a one-time charge in the fourth quarter.

Nokia filed a complaint against Apple with the U.S. International Trade Commission over patent infringements in "virtually all" of its mobile devices, portable music players, and computers.

Nokia claims that Apple is using seven of its patents for key features in its products, including user interface and camera, antenna and power management technologies. "While our litigation in Delaware is about Apple's attempt to free-ride on the back of Nokia investment in wireless standards, the ITC case filed today is about Apple's practice of building its business on Nokia's proprietary innovation," said Paul Melin, general manager of patent licensing at Nokia. Read more about Nokia's complaint against Apple "


Source:
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/stocks-in-focus-for-wednesday-2009-12-29?reflink=MW_news_stmp


Market Watch... Well Folks If you have STOCK in ANY companies on this BLOG - then don't Say you were NOT Given a Heads Up on the Lies your Company or your Stock Management Team is Feeding YOU... those in charge of your Portfolios, those in the Management and Corporate offices of these Companies - THEY know about a Trillion Dollar Liability and My Guess is NONE of them HAVE it on the BOOKS.

Bruce Sewill


Apple, Broadcom,

Iviewit has also discovered a multi-layered scheme and artifice to defraud shareholders

"Iviewit has also discovered a multi-layered scheme and artifice to defraud shareholders via a complex corporate shell game whereby two sets of identical companies were formed and two sets of patents were filed.

Whereby one set of patents was bogus and put into the companies owned by the shareholders and the other set of patents containing the core inventions was put into companies dubiously formed with identical names to the shareholder companies.

The ownership of the shadow companies appears none other than the law firm of Proskauer Rose LLP and other unknowns at this time. Shareholders were notified of the crimes in a shareholder communication dated April 2004 identifying much of the information discovered relating to the crimes, (SHAREHOLDER LETTER IDENTIFYING CRIMES AND GUILTY PARTIES - 3meg file, patience is mandatory).

The crimes have been reported to Federal, State and International authorities and ongoing investigations into the crimes are underway, whereby including but not limited to: the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the United States Patent and Trademark Office, the USPTO OED which regulates licensed patent attorneys, the Inspector Generals Office of the Federally Backed Small Business Administration, the Boca Raton Florida PD in conjunction with the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Florida Department of Professional Regulation, the AICPA, the European Patent Office (EPO) and its attorney regulatory body the Institute of Professional Representatives Before the European Patent Office (IPR).

Additionally, to no avail due to conflicts of interest, violations of public office and a denial of due process that precludes even filing complaints against them, the complaints none-the-less were filed with the state bar associations of New York, Florida and Virginia.

All been apprised of the criminal activities that have taken place, all have failed to investigate our allegations and New York and Florida bar and state Supreme Court agency members have been caught in conflict handling the complaints.

The company has compiled a list of crimes that have been filed with federal, state and international authorities showing the vast number of crimes that have been committed in the theft of the Iviewit intellectual properties.

Where such crimes include not only fraud against the Iviewit shareholders and inventors but fraud upon federal, state and international agencies, including but not limited to: the United States Patent & Trademark Office, the United States Copyright Office, the Federal Bankruptcy court, the Florida and Delaware State Departments, the Florida and New York Supreme Courts, the Federally backed Small Business Administration, a civil court in Florida, the European Patent Office (and the thirty or so representative countries that comprise such EPO) and the Japanese Patent Office.

Check out the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division: First Department court orders for investigation of the former President of the New York State Bar Association Steven C. Krane by clicking on his picture for the document. This is the price of gluttony and greed and why the almighty one has deemed such a sin.

Krane, who is the epitome of ethics has lost his way and acted in conflict of interest and abuse of public office with both the First Department Disciplinary Committee and the New York State Bar Association in representing his partners while maintaining conflicting public office positions in the New York Supreme Courts and NYSBA. Although his investigation has been temporarily de-railed, it will one day be completed as a formal investigation.

Yet, while Krane clerked for Chief Justice of the New York Court of Appeals, Judith Kaye, who by the by, is married to a Proskauer partner, Stephen Kaye, who is one of the accused Proskauer partners in the Intellectual Property Department (formed after learning of the Iviewit inventions), it looks like such forces are blocking the court ordered investigation through yet another series of conflicts and abuses in the investigating department.

Where it appears that Proskauer Rose has positioned deep within the ethics departments and courts to block due process and stave off the inevitable. Yet, as you read on, even these further desperate attempts to block prosecution have uncovered further conflicts which have only caused more people to become ensnared in the web of crimes and further complaints to be filed.
Florida Bar Complaints
Where those complaints in some instances have been refused to file and docket by members of the departments acting to block complaints against themselves inapposite of the laws of those states. Can you imagine, complaints filed against public officers where such officers than deny the complaints with out formal procedure, sounds like the old communist regime where citizens where unable to complain about their elected officials.

It does not sound like the good old USofA where we have a constitutional right to complain against our elected officials when they are found guilty of abuse of public office and as citizens we have an obligation to our country to file such charges. Yet, the onion is peeling and desperate times call for desperate measures.

And all the kings lawyers,
And all the kings men,
Couldn't put Proskauer Rose back together again.

Where once caught stealing the patents, Proskauer has gone through elaborate steps to obstruct justice and deny due process of complaints against them.

Through abuses of public office positions and a series of diabolical conflicts of interests at Supreme Court bar associations and in a civil court in Florida, where initial complaints were filed, including a counter complaint.

Florida Bar Complaints

The counter complaint was denied to be allowed and in this civil billing case Proskauer won through a default judgment after the judge dismissed two sets of Iviewit counsel and granted Proskauer a victory for Iviewit's failure to retain replacement counsel.

This case will be appealed pending information from the investigations, because as it turns out, Iviewit defended companies it did not own, as Proskauer appears to have sued the companies they fraudulently set up to own the stolen patents.

Florida Bar Complaints

That once caught stealing the patents, Proskauer made a desperate attempt to rid the shell companies that they had put the stolen IP into and gain control of the assets through a lawsuit claiming monies owed, while their management referrals tried and involuntary bankruptcy claiming monies owed. In fact, the company was not even aware that Proskauer Rose and their management had taken such actions.

Florida Bar Complaints

The company was notified by members of AOLTW/WB while seeking a twenty five million dollar raise that such legal actions were found while doing their due-diligence but the company was never made aware they were even lawsuits or bankruptcy, as these were for companies named similar and identical to the shareholder companies but not owned by the shareholders.

Upon learning of the legal actions and involuntary bankruptcy the company through a friend and hero (and you will learn of many who have helped carry the torch this far through personal sacrifice and risk), Caroline Prochotska Rogers, Esq. fired the counsel we were unaware we had and filed the counter complaint in the civil case and filed in the bankruptcy.

Florida Bar Complaints

We retained new counsel, Steven Selz, Esq., Greenberg Traurig, and others to begin to peel the onion and file back but Judge Jorge Labarga would not allow us to present our case and through denying due process and procedure threw the case.

All prior counsel was fired that had been prior representing the companies without authorization and this new team took over the cases. At the time, it was not known that two sets of identical companies had been set up and that the companies we were now defending were not owned by the shareholders but by the companies lawyers.

Florida Bar Complaints

Therefore, Iviewit at the time thought that it was representing companies that its shareholders owned. It was not until the USPTO found that certain patents listed by the attorneys as assets of the Iviewit companies, where not in fact owned or assigned to the parties the attorneys listed on the IP dockets, (USPTO LETTER SHOWING THAT CERTAIN IP ASSETS THOUGHT TO BE IVIEWIT ASSETS ARE OTHERS) that evidence of the multi-layered corporate and patent shell scheme began to surface.

Florida Bar Complaints

Identically named companies, as illustrated in the Company History section, were formed to transfer stolen IP in the wrong inventors names and with no assignment or ownership to shareholders; fascinating, like a shell game of hide the real patents.

Upon attempting to ascertain why the patents were all wrong in inventors, assignees, owners and content, it was learned that dual named corporations were set up and again the information has been forwarded to state and federal authorities and the company is awaiting the outcome of these investigations.

Federal and international authorities have been notified that the organization MPEGLA LLC and other patent pools now controlled by our former Proskauer patent attorneys are acting as anti-competitive and monopolistic criminal enterprises to further aid in the theft and proliferation of the Iviewit inventions through a tying and bundling scheme.

Florida Bar Complaints

This scheme denies paying royalties to the Iviewit Shareholders including the SBA. Why, you may ask, is Proskauer Rose, LLP a former real estate firm since the 1800's, suddenly controlling patent pools that directly infringe upon the Iviewit inventions, after Proskauer learned of the inventions directly from the inventors?

Florida Bar Complaints

In fact, Proskauer attorney Kenneth Rubenstein, a member of the Advisory Board for Iviewit and lead patent counsel to MPEGLA LLC, is now trying to claim that he never heard of Iviewit under deposition (Rubenstein Deposition) and sworn statements to a civil court. Where evidence shows Rubenstein's direct involvement, Rubenstein is found to be a BIG FAT LIAR (Click Ken's picture for his Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division: First Department court ordered investigation by ruling of five Justices).

Florida Bar Complaints

Evidence such as his name in the Iviewit billings and letters from executives of AOLTW/WB showing that he opined favorably on the patents to induce investment from them, contradicts his perjured deposition. Evidence like his name as an Advisory Board Member in a Wachovia Private Placement Memorandum, co-authored, disseminated and billed for by his firm Proskauer and hosts of other evidence clearly showing his knowledge and involvement.

Florida Bar Complaints

When confronted under deposition with such evidence, Rubenstein refused to answer direct deposition questions (at his civil billing case) and left his deposition stating that we would have to have the court order him back to answer questions that directly affect the shareholders.

The court did order him back to the answer the questions but before he could be re-deposed the civil case trial was thwarted by the judge. Iviewit after being released of retained counsel by the judge never got the opportunity.

Florida Bar Complaints

Kenneth Rubenstein who swears under deposition, under sworn statements to the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division: First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee and in a written statement to Judge Jorge Labarga of the civil court in Florida to have never heard of Iviewit, the Iviewit inventions or inventors; cannot be the same Kenneth Rubenstein opining favorably on the Iviewit patents to AOLTW/WB (click here for AOLTW/WB letter dusting Rubenstein's statements and exposing him for perjury).

Of course in good time we will get to Rubenstein's lackey, attorney Raymond Anthony Joao, who was a patent attorney working under Rubenstein's direction.

Florida Bar Complaints

Raymond Joao now claims 90 patents in his own name and Iviewit gives him kudos as the greatest slime ball inventor and patent attorney.

Florida Bar Complaints

No really, Iviewit considers our former counselors Joao and Rubenstein to be nothing more than co-inventors of a system and method to defraud shareholders and inventors of their inventions and commit fraud upon worldwide patent intellectual property organizations, an invention that should carry some stiff federal sentences.

Click here for a press article on the amazing inventiveness of Joao . Joao was so non-inventive that many of these patents resemble ideas and concepts lifted straight from the Iviewit business plan and invention disclosures and ideas that he was supposed to be patenting for the inventors and shareholders.

Much time was wasted causing losses of investors and inventors rights to the Intellectual Properties, perhaps permanently, by the railroading of complaints filed against the attorneys involved in thefts.

Where Proskauer partners were found violating state Supreme Court public office positions and representing their partners while holding public offices that directly prohibited their representations under conflict laws and other state laws in complaints filed against them. How they have staved off prosecution of confirmed conflicts of interest and Supreme Court of New York court ordered investigations, is just more abuse of public offices and further denial of due process through manipulation of the laws they are supposed to be upholding, but fascinating nonetheless.

How high to the crimes elevate, how much more can shareholders be denied of due process is a question of who exactly is spearheading the efforts to continue this hoax on shareholders.

If in fact, denials of due process are found in Justice or the Courts further, it would appear that after Inspector General reports and Department of Commerce investigations that perhaps only a President could be capable of placing people in these roles to block our efforts. If this is found to be the case shareholder claims will have to elevate to a complaint against the administration and those involved in the crimes or cover up of the crimes, to be appropriately titled Patentgate.

The state bars in New York and Florida investigations where thwarted by a series of conflicts of interests and improprieties. Proskauer attorneys violated public office positions in those states to derail investigations. Uncovered after almost two years, after delay after delay of the investigations was achieved through the conflicts, the Florida case against Wheeler and Triggs has reached the United States Supreme Court in an appeal of the Florida Supreme Courts decision in case SC04-1078 and Case Status.

Florida Supreme Court's failure to regulate and discipline attorney's caught in violation of public offices and failure to follow procedures established by the Florida Constitution for dealing with attorney misconduct as regulated by the Florida Bar and over sighted by the Supreme Court of Florida (SCF) is the cause of the case on appeal to the United States Supreme Court, that the Supreme Court of the United States denied to hear, leaving the shareholders with no forum to file complaints against Triggs for his public office violation of a Florida Supreme Court rule?

Perhaps this is why Sandra Day O'Connor upon fleeing the United States Supreme Court with death threats levied against her and Ginsburg, stated this country was in the throws of a dictatorship that should be stopped sooner than later.

Take a moment to honor the original conspirator, Christopher Clark Wheeler, one of the main suspects and ringleaders of the crime who has subsequently been charged with a Felony Driving Under the Influence Charge with Injury making his credibility as an attorney further mired in crimes. An arrest warrant was been issued in that matter, click Wheeler's picture on the left for the Delray Beach Police Department report or this link - Wheeler's arrest report or this one for the PD blotter.

So where his more serious crimes, like fraud on a whole bunch of government agencies and foreign nations now landed Iviewit and its shareholders at the United States Supreme Court to present our case for violations of public office by Wheeler and Triggs, Wheeler going with this further public nuisance crime upon his head.

Wheeler, the main protagonist, the first attorney to revel the inventions and be disclosed the processes, is found recklessly endangering lives, now drunk and a true danger to himself and society. In addition, the Petition filed by Iviewit contained allegations and evidence that linked the President of the Florida Bar and others to conflicts.

The Florida Supreme Court ordered a response to the Petition by the Florida Bar and what was set forth in response was perhaps the most incompetent legal response (Illiterate Florida Bar Response to Petition) ever by the Florida Bar, authored by Eric Turner - Chief Branch Officer, and Turner completed law school.

Authored with a complaint filed against him, which should have precluded his response in conflict, yet Turner so stressed out writes a letter that is legally and intelligibly incoherent, even addressing the Florida Supreme Court improperly and this is a Chief Counsel of The Florida Bar. For this letter alone Turner should have been sent back to law school.

Turners response fails to address any of the allegations in the Petition as demanded by the SCF order and instead states that the Florida Bar review work was done well.

The problem, the review was done and included responses tendered by Triggs as attorney for his partner Wheeler, while Triggs was in a confirmed black-out period at the Florida Bar where he was unable to represent any party due to his public office position with the Florida Bar.

Iviewit filed with the SCF a rebuttal identifying the Florida Bar failure to address the questions in the Petition and asking for a default judgment and also due to Turner's response failing to properly identify parties including the SCF, Rebuttal Response. Further, the exhibits in the illiterate response done by Turner which contain the Florida Bar reviewers (no investigation was undertaken) assessment of the Wheeler complaint, are all invalid, as Wheeler's responses where all tendered by Triggs in conflict but what is interesting to note is how each reviewer attempts to claim that they found no wrong doing or that Proskauer was not patent counsel.

Without any investigation, the Florida Bar is not allowed by their own rules to make any opinions in favor of either party and may only decline to undertake investigation.

Yet, the conflicts, unknown and concealed by Wheeler and Triggs had worked there magic and influenced the Florida Bar to attempt to write exculpatory language on behalf of Proskauer, one wonders what the cost of buying off justice cost.

The Florida Bar acting more as a defacto attorney protection agency versus a consumer organization, where even after being caught in conflicts and violations of public office - attorneys remain not prosecuted and where citizen complaints to The Florida Bar have been denied being filed quite inapposite the intent of the Florida Constitution in creating a bar and inapposite of the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar.

When citizens are denied the right to complain about elected officials violating clearly established laws inapposite the rules of procedure, it is reminiscent of the former Soviet Union. Shocking but true, just look up the case and watch it as it now is up for appeal at the United States Supreme Court and there is more corruption following, this time a similar series of conflicts of interest, improprieties and abuses of public office in New York, where court ordered investigations have been derailed and other miscellaneous fodder.

So we begin our dialogue regarding New York by showing that former President of the New York State Bar, Proskauer partner Steven C. Krane, was caught in conflict of interest in violation of his public office positions and where a court of five Justices ordered an immediate investigation (New York Supreme Court Appellate Division: First Department Court Order Investigate Krane) of Krane and had to have the matters moved to a new jurisdiction for investigation.

So how did Krane, Kenneth Rubenstein and Raymond Joao avoid court ordered investigation, stay tuned as more information regarding how to derail and deny due process continues, where the answer will assimilated and uploaded shortly.

OK - now if you have all week and are a speed reader, here are some of the Iviewit rebuttals to the responses these guys attempted at the state bars and they are chalk full of evidence and exhibits of all kinds of cool crimes and you will scratch your head again and again as you wonder how they got out of this, until it dawns on you that Proskauer partners in conflict handled the complaint processes against themselves and positioned and politicked like their lives depended on it to stop due process through conflict and abuse of public offices.

Proskauer's responses to the bar will start the flow here and where Proskauer's eternal defense for these crimes is stated in their sworn perjured statements to the bar and it is composed of the following arguments:

Proskauer had nothing to do with Iviewit's intellectual properties; absurd but they try it in the face of mounds of evidence and witness against such claim, including their own bills.

Iviewit is a failed dot com looking for someone to blame. So what are we still doing here and why are patents involved in a failed dot com, why are Proskauer partners being ordered for investigation for conflicts, why is Iviewit petitioning the Supreme Court with patents in suspension by the Commissioner of Patents and why is the Inspector General of the SBA preparing to audit their investment, as the largest shareholder of the company?

If these weak arguments do not hold up once a formal and conflict free investigation prevails, its goodbye Proskauer, et. al. to the federal big house, not to be confused with white collar camp, as these are some pretty heavy charges of federal, state and international crimes and again the theft is certainly grand and perhaps the largest ever attempted in history.

As we all know the patents are priceless and being used around the world in almost every home and business that's "connected" and in every form of digital imaging and video.

So with that ado here are the Proskauer responses to the original complaints and the Iviewit rebuttals.

A word of caution, Wheeler's complaint was filed before Joao and Rubenstein by a stretch and his complaint is contained in exhibit in both the Wheeler and Joao complaints. Rubenstein and Joao both likewise have the entirety of each others complaints inside their individual complaints and the Wheeler Complaint as well. This is why the documents appear so voluminous, although they are all about 1000 pages.

We threw William J. Dick of Foley and Lardner's bar complaint in as well, and this is full of evidences of the patent frauds that were discovered post Wheeler, Kenneth Rubenstein and Joao filings.

It is interesting to see how Iviewit did not know how the scam worked when filing the original complaints and did not know of the fraudulent set of identically named companies or the fraudulent set of patents and when you read more current filings you see how additional evidence continued to surface and put the puzzle together.

Even today, with much evidence still being reviewed it is as if each day new crimes are uncovered and a bit more of the truth is revealed.

Also be weary that the responses done on both Christopher Wheeler and Kenneth Rubenstein were done by Proskauer Rose partners with conflicting public office roles at those departments and the conflicts extend throughout the disciplinary departments to the executive offices of the bars and disciplinary.

Must say Proskauer Rose did do an amicable job of planting and corrupting the process through conflict but how else could they stave off of the evidence presented in the bar rebuttals and civil courts, etc.

Yet, now all prior reviews of the matters are worthless, all letters and correspondences from these departments are worthless and until the Proskauer controls on the New York disciplinary departments and New York courts are removed and then the same done in Florida, Iviewit does not have a snowballs chance in Florida of fair and impartial, conflict free due process in the courts or the attorney disciplinary agencies.

Yet, now that they are caught in the violations of public office positions it is only a matter of time until they will be prosecuted.

Source of POST and Lots of Documentation
http://www.iviewit.tv/about/index.htm
Patent Fraud