Why is the Iviewit Case Dismissed as "moot" and Non-Factual - when the Whistleblower Christine C. Anderson Case has not been Decided?

Why is the Iviewit Case that is "Legally" Related to the Christine C. Anderson whistleblower case, why is it dismissed when the Christine C. Anderson case has not been decided on?

http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20090908%20FINAL%20Emergency%20Motion%20to%20Compel%20SIGNED44948.pdf