Time to Disbar the Florida Bar. STOP Criminal Activity Among the Florida Attorney Fraternity.

When is Enough really Enough?

The Florida Bar seems to constantly protect illegal activity among Florida Attorneys, to the point of a Trillion Dollar patent theft in which will soon take the investment portfolios of many shareholders of Warner Bros. , Intel, Time Warner Inc. , AOL and More involved in the Stealing of the Iviewit Technlogies Stolen Patent.

More on the Involvement of the Florida Courts and the Florida Bar in the aiding and abetting of stealing a Trillion Dollar Patent at: www.Iviewit.TV - www.DeniedPatent.com -

Time to STOP Corruption in the Florida Attorney Fraternity.

Time for Accountable among Florida Attorneys.

Click Here to Listen to Disbar the Florida Bar Radio Show

"" The Florida Bar is a mandatory organization of all lawyers who are licensed by the Supreme Court of Florida to practice law in the state.

John Harkness, Esq., is the Executive Director of The Florida Bar. Mr. Harkness’ core function is to oversee the prosecution of unethical lawyers.

Mr. Harkness’ responsibilities conflict with his position as a Director on the Board of The Florida Bar’s created malpractice carrier, Florida Lawyers Mutual Insurance Company.

As a Director on the Board of the insurance company, Mr. Harkness’ duties include vigorously defending any attorney accused of ethical violations and legal malpractice, who are insured by FLMIC. Yet, Mr. Harkness has held these conflicted dual positions for more than a decade. ""

Other Links on
Iviewit Technologies and the Corrupt Florida Bar

http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?tag=the-florida-bar

http://miamimirror.blogspot.com/2010/01/formal-complaint-lodged-with-florida.html

http://www.jorgelabarga.com/2010/03/eliot-bernstein-of-iviewit-technologies.html

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:ktIVkVh6K68J:www.iviewit.tv/20091005%2520NY%2520Judiciary%2520Committee%2520Prepared%2520Statement.doc+%22florida+bar%22+%22iviewit%22&cd=2&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

http://www.floridagrandjury.com/2010/02/greenberg-traurig-openingly-stands-in.html

http://www.industrywhistleblower.tv/2010/02/list-of-parties-named-in-eliot.html

http://www.ethicscomplaint.com/2009/12/iviewit-holdings-inc-conflict-of.html

http://www.jorgelabarga.com/2010/02/florida-bar-under-fire-for-lack-of.html

http://patentgate.blogspot.com/2006/01/response-to-why-data-compression-news.html

http://www.bankruptcytrusteefraud.com/2010/03/fbi-coverups-boca-police-scandals-major.html

Florida Bar and Florida Supreme Court FAILS Florida Citizens, Inventors, Companies and Share Holders..

Links to Documents...

Wheeler response to The initial small form Florida Bar complaint
Iviewit rebuttal to Wheeler response to The Florida Bar #1
some wheeler perjury to florida bar goes well with dui and somehow evades detection
William J. Dick - foley and lardner - Virginia state bar rebuttal -
it is interesting to note that dick in his response to the the vsb sends a portfolio patent docket that the united states patent & trademark office says has some false & misleading information contained in - such as certain patents that the company has no rights, title or interests in. the vsb refuses phone calls to re-investigate based on this information that has led to uspto and federal investigations of the matters.

in the dick exhibits you will see how iviewit got dicked around as the evidence appears that there are two sets of patents with similar names and different inventors. iviewit does not attest to these documents as factual representations of the original filings as much document tampering has occurred on the patent documents

matthew triggs - florida bar complaint - florida bar and florida supreme court refuse to docket formally the complaint although it has affirmed violations of triggs public office as a member of the florida bar and conflicting his representation of wheeler. currently under review at the united states supreme court.

supreme court of florida - iviewit original filing
florida bar response to supreme court order to respond to petition
fails to deal with any substantive issues of the petition and as such stands in default. they claim to have done a good review to the supreme court and where such review contained conflicted responses from triggs, that would have invalidated the prior reviews.

response is unintelligible and addresses parties incorrectly such as (this court) when more appropriately (this Court) and other such defined term problems.

iviewit rebuttal to florida bar non-response - supreme court of florida
florida bar response - another turner classic

Civil Action Filed - Trillion Dollar Technology Stolen by Patent Attorney - no One Can do Anything.

http://www.frankbrady.org/TammanyHall/Documents_files/07cv11196%20Iviewit%20Complaint.pdf

stolen patent
iviewit patent theft