Showing posts with label Florida Bar Complaints. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Florida Bar Complaints. Show all posts

Friday, June 4, 2010

Time to Disbar the Florida Bar. STOP Criminal Activity Among the Florida Attorney Fraternity.

When is Enough really Enough?

The Florida Bar seems to constantly protect illegal activity among Florida Attorneys, to the point of a Trillion Dollar patent theft in which will soon take the investment portfolios of many shareholders of Warner Bros. , Intel, Time Warner Inc. , AOL and More involved in the Stealing of the Iviewit Technlogies Stolen Patent.

More on the Involvement of the Florida Courts and the Florida Bar in the aiding and abetting of stealing a Trillion Dollar Patent at: www.Iviewit.TV - www.DeniedPatent.com -

Time to STOP Corruption in the Florida Attorney Fraternity.
Time for Accountable among Florida Attorneys.


"" The Florida Bar is a mandatory organization of all lawyers who are licensed by the Supreme Court of Florida to practice law in the state.

John Harkness, Esq., is the Executive Director of The Florida Bar. Mr. Harkness’ core function is to oversee the prosecution of unethical lawyers.

Mr. Harkness’ responsibilities conflict with his position as a Director on the Board of The Florida Bar’s created malpractice carrier, Florida Lawyers Mutual Insurance Company.

As a Director on the Board of the insurance company, Mr. Harkness’ duties include vigorously defending any attorney accused of ethical violations and legal malpractice, who are insured by FLMIC. Yet, Mr. Harkness has held these conflicted dual positions for more than a decade. ""

Other Links on
Iviewit Technologies and the Corrupt Florida Bar

http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?tag=the-florida-bar

http://miamimirror.blogspot.com/2010/01/formal-complaint-lodged-with-florida.html

http://www.jorgelabarga.com/2010/03/eliot-bernstein-of-iviewit-technologies.html

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:ktIVkVh6K68J:www.iviewit.tv/20091005%2520NY%2520Judiciary%2520Committee%2520Prepared%2520Statement.doc+%22florida+bar%22+%22iviewit%22&cd=2&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

http://www.floridagrandjury.com/2010/02/greenberg-traurig-openingly-stands-in.html

http://www.industrywhistleblower.tv/2010/02/list-of-parties-named-in-eliot.html

http://www.ethicscomplaint.com/2009/12/iviewit-holdings-inc-conflict-of.html

http://www.jorgelabarga.com/2010/02/florida-bar-under-fire-for-lack-of.html

http://patentgate.blogspot.com/2006/01/response-to-why-data-compression-news.html

http://www.bankruptcytrusteefraud.com/2010/03/fbi-coverups-boca-police-scandals-major.html

Tuesday, January 5, 2010

RICO Complaint against Florida State Bar and Florida Supreme Court - Lorraine Hoffman - Eric Turner - Matthew Triggs - John Boggs

"" Lorraine Christine Hoffman - ("Hoffman"); Eric Turner - ("Turner"); Kenneth Marvin - ("Marvin"); Anthony Boggs - ("Boggs"); Joy A. Bartmon - ("Bartmon"); Kelly Overstreet Johnson - ("Johnson"); Jerald Beer - ("Beer"); Triggs; Wheeler; any other John Doe ("John Doe") The Florida Bar staff, known or not known to have been involved at the time. Hereinafter, collectively referred to as ("TFB") ""

SUPREME COURT JUSTICES
LORRAINE HOFFMAN,
ERIC TURNER,
JOHN BOGGS,
KELLY OVERSTREET JOHNSON,
JOY BARTMON,
GERALD BEERS,
KENNETH MARVIN,
MATTHEW TRIGGS and
CHRISTOPHER WHEELER "

Contributory Antitrust Violations

Facilitates RICO Violations

VIOLATIONS OF THE RULES REGULATING
THE FLORIDA BAR

VIOLATIONS OF THE CODE OF PROFESSIONAL REGULATION

VIOLATIONS OF PUBLIC OFFICES

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

IMPROPRIETY

OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE
FAILURE TO FILE CHARGES AGAINST PUBLIC OFFICER
CAUGHT IN CONFLICT OF INTEREST AND VIOLATIONS OF PUBLIC OFFICE -
MATTHEW TRIGGS & KELLY OVERSTREET JOHNSON
OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE - DOCUMENT DESTRUCTION

OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE -
FAILURE TO DOCKET COMPLAINTS AGAINST
TRIGGS, WHEELER, TURNER & HOFFMAN

OBSTRUCTIONS OF JUSTICE

FAILURE TO FOLLOW JUDICIAL CANNONS ""

Source of Post
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/rico/THE%20FLORIDA%20BAR.htm

Florida Bar Complaints

FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT - WEST PALM BEACH FLORIDA - Judge Jorge LABARGA

"" JUDGE JORGE LABARGA
Circuit Court of the 15th Judicial Circuit in and
For Palm Beach County, Florida''


Contributory Antitrust Violations

Facilitates RICO Violations

VIOLATIONS OF THE CODE OF PROFESSIONAL REGULATION

VIOLATIONS OF PUBLIC OFFICES

IMPROPRIETY

OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE - FAILURE TO REPORT ATTORNEY CRIMINAL

MISCONDUCT VIOLATIONS

FAILURE TO FOLLOW JUDICIAL CANNONS ""

THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK APPELLATE DIVISION: FIRST JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT, DEPARTMENTAL DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE& THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK APPELLATE DIVISION: SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT, DEPARTMENTAL DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE

First Department Chart


Second Department Chart

Thomas Cahill - ("Cahill");

Joseph Wigley - ("Wigley"); Krane,
any other John Doe ("John Doe")

THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK APPELLATE DIVISION:

FIRST JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT, DEPARTMENTAL DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE staff, known or not known to have been involved at the time.

Hereinafter, collectively referred to as ("First Dept DDC").



Source of This Post
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/rico/LABARGA.htm
Florida
Florida Supreme Court - One Rotten Apple - Above the Law.
Jorge Labarga
http://www.frankbrady.org/TammanyHall/Documents_files/07cv11196%20Iviewit%20Complaint.pdf

Greenberg Traurig, they sure seem to be interested in this Blog, but is anyone interested in Them.

Greenberg Traurig is above the Law, Above Ethics and who cares, Attorneys have all the power and the justice system seems to have no real need for the Truth.

Greenberg Traurig represents the Florida Bar right? as in Toady's Headlines where Jesse Diner claims ONE BAD APPLE.. .. to funny .. but yes he had the Balls to Say it...

Greenberg Traurig seems to be Behind a whole lot of Evil Goin' on Down there in the State of Florida.

Greenberg Traurig is friends of Abramoff Right? And Greenberg Traurig has a bit to do with the Stanford scandal Right?

And Come on How Blatant Can you Get about your Total Disregard for the "Conflict of Interest Thing" When Greenberg Traurig Represented Iviewit somehow right?

I mean didn't Greenberg Traurig do a patent review for the Iviewit Technology Company as retained counsel and then in a Blatant Above the Law and in Total dis-Regard of Conflicts of Interest and Attorney Ethics they turned around and then Represented the Florida State Bar against the Iviewit Company, Hmmmm..

this stuff is So Blatant and So Obvious.

That there is No Way you could ever wonder if the State of Florida holds attorneys accountable, Holds Attorneys to ANY kind of ethics, the Florida State Bar does NOT care about conflicts of interest... it is all about protecting their own asses and We the People, Who Cares About them?

Greenberg Traurig is not accountable for Conflicts of Interest so No Wonder the Florida State Bar is NOT accountable and no Wonder Jesse Diner thinks there is only "one Rotten apple"...

Florida State Bar, Greenberg Traurig

Sunday, January 3, 2010

Surely the Honorable Florida Court System and Law Enforcement is Doing Something about all this?

From October 11th of 2004 - What is Being Done.. Well Looks to Me Like NOTHING, which is Exactly what I have Come to Expect from the United States Justice System at ALL Levels...

Here is the Court Document...


"IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA

Florida Bar Complaints

CHRISTOPHER C. WHEELER

ERIC M. TURNER

MATTHEW H. TRIGGS


SUPPLEMENT TO MOTION FOR:

DECLARATORY RELIEF; INTERVENE IN THIRD PARTY
INVESTIGATIONS OF THE BOCA RATON POLICE DEPARTMENT, THE
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, AND THE SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION WITH THE COURT’S OVERSIGHT; AND AN
EMERGENCY HEARING FOR THE IMMEDIATE PROTECTIVE CUSTODY


IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
ELIOT I. BERNSTEIN and )
P. STEPHEN LAMONT )
Petitioners )

vs.

THE FLORIDA BAR (IN THE MATTER OF )
ATTORNEY COMPLAINTS AGAINST; )
CHRISTOPHER C. WHEELER, FILE NO: )
2003-51 109 (15c); CHRISTOPHER C. WHEELER 2, FILE NO: PENDING CASE )
NO. ASSIGNMENT; MATTHEW H. TRIGGS, )
NO: PENDING CASE NO. ASSIGNMENT; )
ERIC M. TURNER, FILE NO: PENDING )
CASE NO. ASSIGNMENT); AND )

COMPLAINTS OF CONFLICTS OF )
INTEREST AND APPEARANCES OF ) CASE NO: SC04-1078
IMPROPRIETY WITH THE FOLLOWING )
FLORIDA BAR REPRESENTATIVES; )

MATTHEW H. TRIGGS AS A GRIEVANCE )
COMMITTEE MEMBER AND FORMER )
GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE MEMBER; )
CHRISTOPHER WHEELER AS A )

GRIEVANCE )
COMMITTEE MEMBER AND FORMER )
GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE MEMBER; )

KELLY OVERSTREET JOHNSON AS )
PRESIDENT, KENNETH L. MARVIN AS )
DIRECTOR OF LAWYER REGULATION, )
JOHN ANTHONY BOGGS AS DIRECTOR )
OF LAWYER REGULATION; LORRAINE )
CHRISTINE HOFFMAN AS BAR COUNSEL; )

ERIC MONTEL TURNER AS CHIEF )
BRANCH DISCIPLINE COUNSEL; AND )
JOY A. BARTMON AS CHAIR OF A )
GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE )

That Eliot I. Bernstein and P. Stephen Lamont (collectively “Petitioners”) hereby
supplement the Motion for:

Declaratory Relief; Intervene in Third Party Investigations of the Boca Raton Police Department, The Federal Bureau of Investigation, and the Securities and Exchange Commission With the Court’s Oversight; and an Emergency Hearing for the Immediate Protective Custody of Eliot I. Bernstein, Candice M. Bernstein, P. Stephen Lamont, P. Stephen Lamont II and Sophia Rana dated October 7, 2004
(“October 7 Motion”), and state as follows:

1. That on October 7th 2004, Petitioners received a voice mail message, Exhibit “A”,
from Assistant Chief James Burke (“Assistant Chief Burke”) of the Boca Raton Police
Department (“Boca PD”) advising Petitioners of contact names at the United States
Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) that were the contacts that were supposed to have received information from the Boca Raton PD and the States Attorney over one year ago and were to have attended a meeting at the Boca PD on October 6th 2004 scheduled by Assistant Chief Burke with the FBI and SEC, to assign investigatory duties.

2. That Assistant Chief Burke’s reasons for delivering contact names to Petitioners was
to confirm the attendees to be present from the SEC at the meeting at the Boca PD on
October 8, 2004 and in regard to those certain written statements submitted by Petitioners
to the Boca PD concerning the misappropriation and conversion of up to One Million
Dollars ($1,000,000) in funds of Iviewit Holdings, Inc.
(“Iviewit”) and the
misappropriation of intellectual property of Iviewit.

3. That, directly after receiving those contact names, Petitioners telephoned the most
senior person involved, a one William Riley (850) 410-9805, of the SEC’s Tallahassee
office, that according to the message left by Burke that Mr. Riley was supposed to have
received information from Doreen Mosemer (305) 982-6301 regarding the investigation.

4. That Mr. Riley, after reviewing a database of cases shared with the West Palm Beach,
Ft. Lauderdale, and Miami branches of the SEC finds no case in the names of either
Petitioners, Iviewit, or any matter pertaining thereto delivered by the Boca PD or the
unidentified States Attorney referenced in the October 7 Motion. Mr. Riley further stated
that he was never informed of any meeting at the Boca PD and had no information
regarding such meeting.

5. That subsequent to the call with Riley, Petitioner was contacted by Doreen Mosemer
whom stated that she knew nothing of the matter and that she was never informed of a
meeting at the Boca PD and literally had no idea what Petitioner was talking about
concerning such scheduled meeting.

6. That these series of events leave Petitioner further convinced that the Boca PD was
not truthful when calling Petitioner to schedule a meeting and that the intent may have
been far more devious than stated to Petitioner by Assistant Chief Burke and further
confirms that the information being given to Petitioner was inaccurate and false.

Most disturbing is that Burke had claimed to have contacted the SEC and assured attendance
originally and that subsequently upon questioning the story became more and more
convoluted giving one the impression that the Boca PD had arranged such meeting to
intimidate Petitioner into not filing with Chief Scott a formal internal affairs investigation request.

That combined with the false statement that Chief Scott was personally involved
and oversight to such meeting and Petitioner case and then Chief Scott’s denial of such
involvement or any knowledge of Petitioner’s case, that this presents clear and present
danger that until such information is clarified and investigated fully, that Petitioner’s
lives may in fact be in danger if the objective was to cover up for misdeeds by the Boca
PD and others.

7. Finally, Petitioner has received no return call from Special Agent Stephen Lucchesi at
the Federal Bureau of Investigation regarding his participation or involvement in such
meeting supposedly arranged and for over one week all calls and faxes have been
ignored.

This may present even more disturbing problems. It is presumed at this point
by Petitioner that the conspirators named in the complaint from various powerful law
firms and other powerful corporate concerns so named in the conspiracy, may in fact
have bribed or positioned to estoppel due process at other state and federal agencies
through devious means such as is alleged regarding the conflicts of interest and
appearance of impropriety at two state bar associations now being reviewed in the Florida
Supreme Court and the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division: Second
Department.

That if similar events have occurred at Federal and State investigatory
agencies to block due process, and if these events are close to being uncovered, that the
immediacy for state ordered protective custody of Petitioner’s is evident.
Wherefore, Petitioners reiterate their request that this Court:

(i) enter an order granting a motion for declaratory relief from the Boca PD and Flechaus as to their investigations of the subject matter of the written statements, their review with an
unidentified District Attorney, and their joint submission to the Miami office of the SEC,
and declaratory relief from the FBI as to their submission of their report to the United
States attorney for the Southern District of Florida;

(ii) enter an order granting a motion for the Court’s intervention in the investigations of the Boca PD, the SEC, if any, and the FBI; and (iii) enter an order granting a motion for an emergency hearing for immediate protective custody Eliot I. Bernstein, Candice M. Bernstein, Joshua P. Stephen Lamont, and P. Stephen Lamont II, and such further relief that the Court deems appropriate.

EXHIBIT “A” MESSAGE ASSISTANT CHIEF OF POLICE JIM BURKE LEFT ON VOICE MAIL ON OCTOBER 7TH 2004

“Eliot Assistant Chief Jim Burke with Boca Raton Police Department I stated I would
provide you phone numbers for the people at the SEC who have the information on your
case.

The first individual is Doreen Mosemer 305 982 6301 I believe she forwarded your
investigation up to Tallahassee to a William Riley his number is 850 410 9805 that’s the
SEC’s representatives um that’s all I can find you for I tried to set up meeting again the
SEC contact numbers, you should have the FBI contact numbers and you have our
contact numbers, good luck.”

This 8th day of October 2004.
Attorney for Petitioners
Eliot I. Bernstein, Pro Se

Eliot I. Bernstein
P. Stephen Lamont, Pro Se



Source of Post
www.Iviewit.TV

Sunday, December 27, 2009

How Does the Florida Bar decide Which Attorneys to Protect and Which Attorneys to Hold Accountable?


Christopher C. Wheeler was involved in a "Felony DUI with injury" yet seems to be above the Law.
Why is Christopher Wheeler even still an Attorney, are there No standards for integrity, honor or truth for Florida Attorneys.
All this Prove of what Christopher C. Wheeler did to Harm the Iviewit Inventors and No One Can Do anything....

There is NO LAW, only Politics, Persuasion, Favors, Side Deals and Who Can do What for Whom...
And this DUI .. well it was a bad deal and people got hurt, who cares right?

Eric Turner, involved with the Forida Bar, who handled the Iviewit against Christopher Wheeler - well surely he did right by the good citizens of Florida Right on this DUI Right? Or did Eric Turner make a public statement that Wheeler committed a misdemeanor and not felony ? And did Eric Wheeler stand up strong and Firm on the Wrong Side of the Moral Compass?


What does the FLABAR, the Florida State Bar say about this? I say that they all protect each other, and that drunk driving and really hurting someone is Legal if your a Proskauer Rose attorney. It seems that Proskauer Rose attorneys are Above the Law at every turning point, as if they are protected somehow. But Why? Why does the Power Elite Protect these People who Hurt others constantly?
It becomes a HUGE group of people who can do No Wrong, Whose powers are unlimited, whose Crimes are constantly Covered up and Well you innocent citizens out there interacting with them, being hurt by them, driving by them when they are DRUNK, well you Get No Justice, No Redemtion, and you have Groups such as the Florida State Bar who makes sure you Get No Justice as they Shovel More of Proskauer Rose Attorneys Indescrestions under that Preverbial Rug.
christopher wheeler
Related Links
Christopher Wheeler

Thursday, December 24, 2009

Florida Bar and Florida Supreme Court FAILS Florida Citizens, Inventors, Companies and Share Holders..

Links to Documents...

Wheeler response to The initial small form Florida Bar complaint
Iviewit rebuttal to Wheeler response to The Florida Bar #1
some wheeler perjury to florida bar goes well with dui and somehow evades detection
William J. Dick - foley and lardner - Virginia state bar rebuttal -
it is interesting to note that dick in his response to the the vsb sends a portfolio patent docket that the united states patent & trademark office says has some false & misleading information contained in - such as certain patents that the company has no rights, title or interests in. the vsb refuses phone calls to re-investigate based on this information that has led to uspto and federal investigations of the matters.

in the dick exhibits you will see how iviewit got dicked around as the evidence appears that there are two sets of patents with similar names and different inventors. iviewit does not attest to these documents as factual representations of the original filings as much document tampering has occurred on the patent documents

matthew triggs - florida bar complaint - florida bar and florida supreme court refuse to docket formally the complaint although it has affirmed violations of triggs public office as a member of the florida bar and conflicting his representation of wheeler. currently under review at the united states supreme court.

supreme court of florida - iviewit original filing
florida bar response to supreme court order to respond to petition
fails to deal with any substantive issues of the petition and as such stands in default. they claim to have done a good review to the supreme court and where such review contained conflicted responses from triggs, that would have invalidated the prior reviews.

response is unintelligible and addresses parties incorrectly such as (this court) when more appropriately (this Court) and other such defined term problems.

iviewit rebuttal to florida bar non-response - supreme court of florida
florida bar response - another turner classic

Iviewit has also discovered a multi-layered scheme and artifice to defraud shareholders

"Iviewit has also discovered a multi-layered scheme and artifice to defraud shareholders via a complex corporate shell game whereby two sets of identical companies were formed and two sets of patents were filed.

Whereby one set of patents was bogus and put into the companies owned by the shareholders and the other set of patents containing the core inventions was put into companies dubiously formed with identical names to the shareholder companies.

The ownership of the shadow companies appears none other than the law firm of Proskauer Rose LLP and other unknowns at this time. Shareholders were notified of the crimes in a shareholder communication dated April 2004 identifying much of the information discovered relating to the crimes, (SHAREHOLDER LETTER IDENTIFYING CRIMES AND GUILTY PARTIES - 3meg file, patience is mandatory).

The crimes have been reported to Federal, State and International authorities and ongoing investigations into the crimes are underway, whereby including but not limited to: the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the United States Patent and Trademark Office, the USPTO OED which regulates licensed patent attorneys, the Inspector Generals Office of the Federally Backed Small Business Administration, the Boca Raton Florida PD in conjunction with the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Florida Department of Professional Regulation, the AICPA, the European Patent Office (EPO) and its attorney regulatory body the Institute of Professional Representatives Before the European Patent Office (IPR).

Additionally, to no avail due to conflicts of interest, violations of public office and a denial of due process that precludes even filing complaints against them, the complaints none-the-less were filed with the state bar associations of New York, Florida and Virginia.

All been apprised of the criminal activities that have taken place, all have failed to investigate our allegations and New York and Florida bar and state Supreme Court agency members have been caught in conflict handling the complaints.

The company has compiled a list of crimes that have been filed with federal, state and international authorities showing the vast number of crimes that have been committed in the theft of the Iviewit intellectual properties.

Where such crimes include not only fraud against the Iviewit shareholders and inventors but fraud upon federal, state and international agencies, including but not limited to: the United States Patent & Trademark Office, the United States Copyright Office, the Federal Bankruptcy court, the Florida and Delaware State Departments, the Florida and New York Supreme Courts, the Federally backed Small Business Administration, a civil court in Florida, the European Patent Office (and the thirty or so representative countries that comprise such EPO) and the Japanese Patent Office.

Check out the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division: First Department court orders for investigation of the former President of the New York State Bar Association Steven C. Krane by clicking on his picture for the document. This is the price of gluttony and greed and why the almighty one has deemed such a sin.

Krane, who is the epitome of ethics has lost his way and acted in conflict of interest and abuse of public office with both the First Department Disciplinary Committee and the New York State Bar Association in representing his partners while maintaining conflicting public office positions in the New York Supreme Courts and NYSBA. Although his investigation has been temporarily de-railed, it will one day be completed as a formal investigation.

Yet, while Krane clerked for Chief Justice of the New York Court of Appeals, Judith Kaye, who by the by, is married to a Proskauer partner, Stephen Kaye, who is one of the accused Proskauer partners in the Intellectual Property Department (formed after learning of the Iviewit inventions), it looks like such forces are blocking the court ordered investigation through yet another series of conflicts and abuses in the investigating department.

Where it appears that Proskauer Rose has positioned deep within the ethics departments and courts to block due process and stave off the inevitable. Yet, as you read on, even these further desperate attempts to block prosecution have uncovered further conflicts which have only caused more people to become ensnared in the web of crimes and further complaints to be filed.
Florida Bar Complaints
Where those complaints in some instances have been refused to file and docket by members of the departments acting to block complaints against themselves inapposite of the laws of those states. Can you imagine, complaints filed against public officers where such officers than deny the complaints with out formal procedure, sounds like the old communist regime where citizens where unable to complain about their elected officials.

It does not sound like the good old USofA where we have a constitutional right to complain against our elected officials when they are found guilty of abuse of public office and as citizens we have an obligation to our country to file such charges. Yet, the onion is peeling and desperate times call for desperate measures.

And all the kings lawyers,
And all the kings men,
Couldn't put Proskauer Rose back together again.

Where once caught stealing the patents, Proskauer has gone through elaborate steps to obstruct justice and deny due process of complaints against them.
Through abuses of public office positions and a series of diabolical conflicts of interests at Supreme Court bar associations and in a civil court in Florida, where initial complaints were filed, including a counter complaint.
Florida Bar Complaints
The counter complaint was denied to be allowed and in this civil billing case Proskauer won through a default judgment after the judge dismissed two sets of Iviewit counsel and granted Proskauer a victory for Iviewit's failure to retain replacement counsel.
This case will be appealed pending information from the investigations, because as it turns out, Iviewit defended companies it did not own, as Proskauer appears to have sued the companies they fraudulently set up to own the stolen patents.
Florida Bar Complaints
That once caught stealing the patents, Proskauer made a desperate attempt to rid the shell companies that they had put the stolen IP into and gain control of the assets through a lawsuit claiming monies owed, while their management referrals tried and involuntary bankruptcy claiming monies owed. In fact, the company was not even aware that Proskauer Rose and their management had taken such actions.
Florida Bar Complaints
The company was notified by members of AOLTW/WB while seeking a twenty five million dollar raise that such legal actions were found while doing their due-diligence but the company was never made aware they were even lawsuits or bankruptcy, as these were for companies named similar and identical to the shareholder companies but not owned by the shareholders.
Upon learning of the legal actions and involuntary bankruptcy the company through a friend and hero (and you will learn of many who have helped carry the torch this far through personal sacrifice and risk), Caroline Prochotska Rogers, Esq. fired the counsel we were unaware we had and filed the counter complaint in the civil case and filed in the bankruptcy.
Florida Bar Complaints
We retained new counsel, Steven Selz, Esq., Greenberg Traurig, and others to begin to peel the onion and file back but Judge Jorge Labarga would not allow us to present our case and through denying due process and procedure threw the case.
All prior counsel was fired that had been prior representing the companies without authorization and this new team took over the cases. At the time, it was not known that two sets of identical companies had been set up and that the companies we were now defending were not owned by the shareholders but by the companies lawyers.
Florida Bar Complaints
Therefore, Iviewit at the time thought that it was representing companies that its shareholders owned. It was not until the USPTO found that certain patents listed by the attorneys as assets of the Iviewit companies, where not in fact owned or assigned to the parties the attorneys listed on the IP dockets, (USPTO LETTER SHOWING THAT CERTAIN IP ASSETS THOUGHT TO BE IVIEWIT ASSETS ARE OTHERS) that evidence of the multi-layered corporate and patent shell scheme began to surface.
Florida Bar Complaints
Identically named companies, as illustrated in the Company History section, were formed to transfer stolen IP in the wrong inventors names and with no assignment or ownership to shareholders; fascinating, like a shell game of hide the real patents.
Upon attempting to ascertain why the patents were all wrong in inventors, assignees, owners and content, it was learned that dual named corporations were set up and again the information has been forwarded to state and federal authorities and the company is awaiting the outcome of these investigations.

Federal and international authorities have been notified that the organization MPEGLA LLC and other patent pools now controlled by our former Proskauer patent attorneys are acting as anti-competitive and monopolistic criminal enterprises to further aid in the theft and proliferation of the Iviewit inventions through a tying and bundling scheme.
Florida Bar Complaints
This scheme denies paying royalties to the Iviewit Shareholders including the SBA. Why, you may ask, is Proskauer Rose, LLP a former real estate firm since the 1800's, suddenly controlling patent pools that directly infringe upon the Iviewit inventions, after Proskauer learned of the inventions directly from the inventors?
Florida Bar Complaints
In fact, Proskauer attorney Kenneth Rubenstein, a member of the Advisory Board for Iviewit and lead patent counsel to MPEGLA LLC, is now trying to claim that he never heard of Iviewit under deposition (Rubenstein Deposition) and sworn statements to a civil court. Where evidence shows Rubenstein's direct involvement, Rubenstein is found to be a BIG FAT LIAR (Click Ken's picture for his Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division: First Department court ordered investigation by ruling of five Justices).
Florida Bar Complaints
Evidence such as his name in the Iviewit billings and letters from executives of AOLTW/WB showing that he opined favorably on the patents to induce investment from them, contradicts his perjured deposition. Evidence like his name as an Advisory Board Member in a Wachovia Private Placement Memorandum, co-authored, disseminated and billed for by his firm Proskauer and hosts of other evidence clearly showing his knowledge and involvement.
Florida Bar Complaints
When confronted under deposition with such evidence, Rubenstein refused to answer direct deposition questions (at his civil billing case) and left his deposition stating that we would have to have the court order him back to answer questions that directly affect the shareholders.
The court did order him back to the answer the questions but before he could be re-deposed the civil case trial was thwarted by the judge. Iviewit after being released of retained counsel by the judge never got the opportunity.
Florida Bar Complaints
Kenneth Rubenstein who swears under deposition, under sworn statements to the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division: First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee and in a written statement to Judge Jorge Labarga of the civil court in Florida to have never heard of Iviewit, the Iviewit inventions or inventors; cannot be the same Kenneth Rubenstein opining favorably on the Iviewit patents to AOLTW/WB (click here for AOLTW/WB letter dusting Rubenstein's statements and exposing him for perjury).

Of course in good time we will get to Rubenstein's lackey, attorney Raymond Anthony Joao, who was a patent attorney working under Rubenstein's direction.
Florida Bar Complaints
Raymond Joao now claims 90 patents in his own name and Iviewit gives him kudos as the greatest slime ball inventor and patent attorney.
Florida Bar Complaints
No really, Iviewit considers our former counselors Joao and Rubenstein to be nothing more than co-inventors of a system and method to defraud shareholders and inventors of their inventions and commit fraud upon worldwide patent intellectual property organizations, an invention that should carry some stiff federal sentences.
Click here for a press article on the amazing inventiveness of Joao . Joao was so non-inventive that many of these patents resemble ideas and concepts lifted straight from the Iviewit business plan and invention disclosures and ideas that he was supposed to be patenting for the inventors and shareholders.

Much time was wasted causing losses of investors and inventors rights to the Intellectual Properties, perhaps permanently, by the railroading of complaints filed against the attorneys involved in thefts.
Where Proskauer partners were found violating state Supreme Court public office positions and representing their partners while holding public offices that directly prohibited their representations under conflict laws and other state laws in complaints filed against them. How they have staved off prosecution of confirmed conflicts of interest and Supreme Court of New York court ordered investigations, is just more abuse of public offices and further denial of due process through manipulation of the laws they are supposed to be upholding, but fascinating nonetheless.
How high to the crimes elevate, how much more can shareholders be denied of due process is a question of who exactly is spearheading the efforts to continue this hoax on shareholders.
If in fact, denials of due process are found in Justice or the Courts further, it would appear that after Inspector General reports and Department of Commerce investigations that perhaps only a President could be capable of placing people in these roles to block our efforts. If this is found to be the case shareholder claims will have to elevate to a complaint against the administration and those involved in the crimes or cover up of the crimes, to be appropriately titled Patentgate.

The state bars in New York and Florida investigations where thwarted by a series of conflicts of interests and improprieties. Proskauer attorneys violated public office positions in those states to derail investigations. Uncovered after almost two years, after delay after delay of the investigations was achieved through the conflicts, the Florida case against Wheeler and Triggs has reached the United States Supreme Court in an appeal of the Florida Supreme Courts decision in case SC04-1078 and Case Status.
Florida Supreme Court's failure to regulate and discipline attorney's caught in violation of public offices and failure to follow procedures established by the Florida Constitution for dealing with attorney misconduct as regulated by the Florida Bar and over sighted by the Supreme Court of Florida (SCF) is the cause of the case on appeal to the United States Supreme Court, that the Supreme Court of the United States denied to hear, leaving the shareholders with no forum to file complaints against Triggs for his public office violation of a Florida Supreme Court rule?
Perhaps this is why Sandra Day O'Connor upon fleeing the United States Supreme Court with death threats levied against her and Ginsburg, stated this country was in the throws of a dictatorship that should be stopped sooner than later.

Take a moment to honor the original conspirator, Christopher Clark Wheeler, one of the main suspects and ringleaders of the crime who has subsequently been charged with a Felony Driving Under the Influence Charge with Injury making his credibility as an attorney further mired in crimes. An arrest warrant was been issued in that matter, click Wheeler's picture on the left for the Delray Beach Police Department report or this link - Wheeler's arrest report or this one for the PD blotter.
So where his more serious crimes, like fraud on a whole bunch of government agencies and foreign nations now landed Iviewit and its shareholders at the United States Supreme Court to present our case for violations of public office by Wheeler and Triggs, Wheeler going with this further public nuisance crime upon his head.
Wheeler, the main protagonist, the first attorney to revel the inventions and be disclosed the processes, is found recklessly endangering lives, now drunk and a true danger to himself and society. In addition, the Petition filed by Iviewit contained allegations and evidence that linked the President of the Florida Bar and others to conflicts.
The Florida Supreme Court ordered a response to the Petition by the Florida Bar and what was set forth in response was perhaps the most incompetent legal response (Illiterate Florida Bar Response to Petition) ever by the Florida Bar, authored by Eric Turner - Chief Branch Officer, and Turner completed law school.
Authored with a complaint filed against him, which should have precluded his response in conflict, yet Turner so stressed out writes a letter that is legally and intelligibly incoherent, even addressing the Florida Supreme Court improperly and this is a Chief Counsel of The Florida Bar. For this letter alone Turner should have been sent back to law school.
Turners response fails to address any of the allegations in the Petition as demanded by the SCF order and instead states that the Florida Bar review work was done well.
The problem, the review was done and included responses tendered by Triggs as attorney for his partner Wheeler, while Triggs was in a confirmed black-out period at the Florida Bar where he was unable to represent any party due to his public office position with the Florida Bar.
Iviewit filed with the SCF a rebuttal identifying the Florida Bar failure to address the questions in the Petition and asking for a default judgment and also due to Turner's response failing to properly identify parties including the SCF, Rebuttal Response. Further, the exhibits in the illiterate response done by Turner which contain the Florida Bar reviewers (no investigation was undertaken) assessment of the Wheeler complaint, are all invalid, as Wheeler's responses where all tendered by Triggs in conflict but what is interesting to note is how each reviewer attempts to claim that they found no wrong doing or that Proskauer was not patent counsel.
Without any investigation, the Florida Bar is not allowed by their own rules to make any opinions in favor of either party and may only decline to undertake investigation.
Yet, the conflicts, unknown and concealed by Wheeler and Triggs had worked there magic and influenced the Florida Bar to attempt to write exculpatory language on behalf of Proskauer, one wonders what the cost of buying off justice cost.
The Florida Bar acting more as a defacto attorney protection agency versus a consumer organization, where even after being caught in conflicts and violations of public office - attorneys remain not prosecuted and where citizen complaints to The Florida Bar have been denied being filed quite inapposite the intent of the Florida Constitution in creating a bar and inapposite of the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar.

When citizens are denied the right to complain about elected officials violating clearly established laws inapposite the rules of procedure, it is reminiscent of the former Soviet Union. Shocking but true, just look up the case and watch it as it now is up for appeal at the United States Supreme Court and there is more corruption following, this time a similar series of conflicts of interest, improprieties and abuses of public office in New York, where court ordered investigations have been derailed and other miscellaneous fodder.

So we begin our dialogue regarding New York by showing that former President of the New York State Bar, Proskauer partner Steven C. Krane, was caught in conflict of interest in violation of his public office positions and where a court of five Justices ordered an immediate investigation (New York Supreme Court Appellate Division: First Department Court Order Investigate Krane) of Krane and had to have the matters moved to a new jurisdiction for investigation.

So how did Krane, Kenneth Rubenstein and Raymond Joao avoid court ordered investigation, stay tuned as more information regarding how to derail and deny due process continues, where the answer will assimilated and uploaded shortly.

OK - now if you have all week and are a speed reader, here are some of the Iviewit rebuttals to the responses these guys attempted at the state bars and they are chalk full of evidence and exhibits of all kinds of cool crimes and you will scratch your head again and again as you wonder how they got out of this, until it dawns on you that Proskauer partners in conflict handled the complaint processes against themselves and positioned and politicked like their lives depended on it to stop due process through conflict and abuse of public offices.

Proskauer's responses to the bar will start the flow here and where Proskauer's eternal defense for these crimes is stated in their sworn perjured statements to the bar and it is composed of the following arguments:

Proskauer had nothing to do with Iviewit's intellectual properties; absurd but they try it in the face of mounds of evidence and witness against such claim, including their own bills.

Iviewit is a failed dot com looking for someone to blame. So what are we still doing here and why are patents involved in a failed dot com, why are Proskauer partners being ordered for investigation for conflicts, why is Iviewit petitioning the Supreme Court with patents in suspension by the Commissioner of Patents and why is the Inspector General of the SBA preparing to audit their investment, as the largest shareholder of the company?

If these weak arguments do not hold up once a formal and conflict free investigation prevails, its goodbye Proskauer, et. al. to the federal big house, not to be confused with white collar camp, as these are some pretty heavy charges of federal, state and international crimes and again the theft is certainly grand and perhaps the largest ever attempted in history.

As we all know the patents are priceless and being used around the world in almost every home and business that's "connected" and in every form of digital imaging and video.

So with that ado here are the Proskauer responses to the original complaints and the Iviewit rebuttals.

A word of caution, Wheeler's complaint was filed before Joao and Rubenstein by a stretch and his complaint is contained in exhibit in both the Wheeler and Joao complaints. Rubenstein and Joao both likewise have the entirety of each others complaints inside their individual complaints and the Wheeler Complaint as well. This is why the documents appear so voluminous, although they are all about 1000 pages.

We threw William J. Dick of Foley and Lardner's bar complaint in as well, and this is full of evidences of the patent frauds that were discovered post Wheeler, Kenneth Rubenstein and Joao filings.

It is interesting to see how Iviewit did not know how the scam worked when filing the original complaints and did not know of the fraudulent set of identically named companies or the fraudulent set of patents and when you read more current filings you see how additional evidence continued to surface and put the puzzle together.

Even today, with much evidence still being reviewed it is as if each day new crimes are uncovered and a bit more of the truth is revealed.

Also be weary that the responses done on both Christopher Wheeler and Kenneth Rubenstein were done by Proskauer Rose partners with conflicting public office roles at those departments and the conflicts extend throughout the disciplinary departments to the executive offices of the bars and disciplinary.

Must say Proskauer Rose did do an amicable job of planting and corrupting the process through conflict but how else could they stave off of the evidence presented in the bar rebuttals and civil courts, etc.

Yet, now all prior reviews of the matters are worthless, all letters and correspondences from these departments are worthless and until the Proskauer controls on the New York disciplinary departments and New York courts are removed and then the same done in Florida, Iviewit does not have a snowballs chance in Florida of fair and impartial, conflict free due process in the courts or the attorney disciplinary agencies.

Yet, now that they are caught in the violations of public office positions it is only a matter of time until they will be prosecuted.

Source of POST and Lots of Documentation
http://www.iviewit.tv/about/index.htm
Patent Fraud