Do NOT Believe the Headlines on the Florida State Bar about "One Rotten Apple" There is a Whole lot more than That Going On - they are Corrupt.

Have you Folks Seen the Headlines Where By Jesse Diner, President of the Florida Bar Tries to Flat OUT Lie to you about the Accountable of Florida Attorneys, the Blatant Ethics Violations and BOLD in your Face Conflict of Interests over and Over, and Jesse Diner ...

well his Job is to Protect the Reputation of the Florida Bar and the Florida Attorneys and NOT to protect the Citizens of Florida or the The Honor and Integrity of the Justice System.


It is not a "One Bad Apple" scenario at the Florida State Bar. They have repeatedly ignored legitimate Proven Complaints. The Florida State Bar was told of Proskauer Rose Attorney Christopher Wheeler over and Over, the Florida State Bar protected Kenneth Rubenstein of Proskauer Rose in a 12 Trillion Dollar Patent Theft.

It seems to Me that the Job of the Florida Supreme Court and the Florida Bar is Only to Protect the Interest of Florida Attorneys.

Eric Turner publicly said that Christopher Wheeler's DUI was a Misdeamoner while the Police Report said it was a Felony. The Florida State Bar is as Corrupt as it comes and though Today's Headlines Flat Out Lie to you it does NOT change the Fact that the Florida State Bar does NOT care about the rights of Victims over the rights or protection Of Attorneys such as Christopher Wheeler and Kenneth Rubenstein both of proskauer Rose Mega-Law firm.

The Florida State Bar does not seem to care about Supreme Court Judges in Florida that would not admit evidence that proved the crimes of these Lawyers as the Judges seems to protect the at Attornity Fraternity.

It Does not matter the facts of the Case, any case really it just matters that the attorneys get 40% of your Settlement and get to Keep Their job, and that they all protect each others breaking of the law, indiscretions, Flat Out Lies and Who Cares if they ruin the lives of the Real Victims over and over again....

The Florida State Bar has a Whole lot more then One Bad Apple in their Midst. There is no accountable at the Florida State Bar, and especially for those who are from the Huge Above the Law, Mega law firms in the Pay to Play Party... you know what I mean..

See the Florida Bar bar folks need to keep up the illusion that they are NOT corrupt and that the Florida Supreme Court is Honorable so that the insurance folks Will keep in the game and they can get all those side deal, and favors owed from the big law firms and corporations they protect.

Yet when you go to them with thousands of documents of proof you see that they only care about those with the most money, power, and political connections such as Proskauer Rose... conflicts of interest .. well they don't care about that either just look at Lawyers like Greenberg Traurig - first on one side of a Case, so they can get all the goods then jump in and Represent the Florida State Bar against Their Original Clients....

Anyway, you get the Picture, there is no Justice, Only Opinion, Pay Offs, Lawyers are Above the Law and NEVER ever believe it is ONLY One Bad apple down their in the Florida Justice System - that is Simply NOT True.

Jesse Diner is either Clueless or Simply of of the Good Ol' Boys down there in Florida Protecting Them There Above the Law Attorneys. Ethics Violations, Conflicts of Interest, Oh Come Now, not In Florida, it just ain't so... Jesse Diner seems to be Delusional in Todays News. Do not be Mis-Led.

The Conflicts of Interest And Ethics Violations run Rampant among the Florida Lack of Justice System and No One Can Do Anything about it. No one can Make the Florida Supreme Court accountable for the Corruption that they ALLOW.

I wonder How Much a Florida Supreme Court Decision Costs? I know in Montana a Supreme Court Decision Costs $50,000 - Not a bad price when you have million dollar judgements overturned.

The Florida Bar is in a 12 Count, 12 Trillion Dollar RICO Lawsuit that legally related by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin of the US Dis Court NY to a Whistleblower inside the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee.

The Florida Supreme Court and Jorge Labarga are also named defendants.

Proskauer Rose is at the Center of the Lawsuit and they are also at the center of the Allen Stanford Ponzi, coaching employees on how to lie to the feds.

They are being sued for entire Stanford losses in class action.

Wonder if the Florida State Bar and Proskauer Rose Law Firm
are reporting these liabilities to state and private auditors.

For more information on the 12 Trillion Dollar RICO Lawsuit
heck out www.Iviewit.tv

There is No Florida Justice System

ONLY Lawyers Protecting Lawyers.

Here is Todays Article

"Rotten apples guard The Bar's orchard"

The recent charges of criminal behavior against attorney Scott Rothstein leave no doubt that he is a bad apple in the "orchard" of the Florida Bar. Unfortunately, there are a substantial number of lawyers just like him still practicing law in Florida, under the control of the Florida Bar. Mr. Rothstein's actions bring to question the Florida Bar's inability to protect Floridians from unethical behavior by one of its members. It seems that the hierarchy of the Florida Bar is only protecting its own interests, and the interests of certain members.

Jesse Diner, president of the Florida Bar, recently used the "one rotten apple" approach to protect the Bar's image. What Mr. Diner failed to mention is the ethical violation and conflict of interest that exists between the Florida Bar, a state agency, and Florida Lawyers Mutual Insurance Company, a private, for-profit attorney malpractice insurance company.

The conflict lies with John Harkness acting as the executive director of the Florida Bar as well as a director of FLMIC.

The meshing of these two groups is unethical and leaves the door open for corruption. This special, incestuous relationship protects rogue lawyers who purchase legal malpractice insurance from FLMIC. This conflict of interest leaves Floridians unprotected and vulnerable.

As a director of Baron's Stores Inc., I have witnessed how this incestuous relationship has caused Baron's to be embroiled in a legal malpractice lawsuit against three South Florida attorneys for more than a decade. The attorneys are insured by FLMIC and Great American Insurance Co.

The law firm of Greenberg Traurig is counsel for the Florida Bar and also represents the insurers. This conflict of interest aids and abets the insurers to violate federal anti-trust laws and violate Florida insurance law.

Recently, the Florida Supreme Court unanimously granted Gov. Charlie Crist's petition to create a statewide grand jury to investigate the corruption of state and local officials as well as judicial misconduct, conspiracy and abuse of power within the Florida legal system. Floridians can only hope that Gov. Crist and Florida Attorney General Bill McCollum will finally begin to restore order.

No wonder the American Tort Reform Association has once again named South Florida the No.1 judicial "hellhole" in the nation.

Scott Rothstein is "one rotten apple" in the bunch, but the Florida Bar will never launch any serious investigation into matters that can cripple the organization because the "rotten apples" are the ones guarding the entire "orchard."

Lesley Winston is director of Baron's Stores Inc. in North Miami

Source of Article:

http://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/opinion/commentary/fl-barons-stores-forum-0105-20100104,0,1433557.story

Trillion Dollar Patent Theft
www.DeniedPatent.com
or More Information.
Proskauer Rose

Surely the Honorable Florida Court System and Law Enforcement is Doing Something about all this?

From October 11th of 2004 - What is Being Done.. Well Looks to Me Like NOTHING, which is Exactly what I have Come to Expect from the United States Justice System at ALL Levels...

Here is the Court Document...


"IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA

Florida Bar Complaints

CHRISTOPHER C. WHEELER

ERIC M. TURNER

MATTHEW H. TRIGGS


SUPPLEMENT TO MOTION FOR:

DECLARATORY RELIEF; INTERVENE IN THIRD PARTY
INVESTIGATIONS OF THE BOCA RATON POLICE DEPARTMENT, THE
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, AND THE SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION WITH THE COURT’S OVERSIGHT; AND AN
EMERGENCY HEARING FOR THE IMMEDIATE PROTECTIVE CUSTODY


IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
ELIOT I. BERNSTEIN and )
P. STEPHEN LAMONT )
Petitioners )

vs.

THE FLORIDA BAR (IN THE MATTER OF )
ATTORNEY COMPLAINTS AGAINST; )
CHRISTOPHER C. WHEELER, FILE NO: )
2003-51 109 (15c); CHRISTOPHER C. WHEELER 2, FILE NO: PENDING CASE )
NO. ASSIGNMENT; MATTHEW H. TRIGGS, )
NO: PENDING CASE NO. ASSIGNMENT; )
ERIC M. TURNER, FILE NO: PENDING )
CASE NO. ASSIGNMENT); AND )

COMPLAINTS OF CONFLICTS OF )
INTEREST AND APPEARANCES OF ) CASE NO: SC04-1078
IMPROPRIETY WITH THE FOLLOWING )
FLORIDA BAR REPRESENTATIVES; )

MATTHEW H. TRIGGS AS A GRIEVANCE )
COMMITTEE MEMBER AND FORMER )
GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE MEMBER; )
CHRISTOPHER WHEELER AS A )

GRIEVANCE )
COMMITTEE MEMBER AND FORMER )
GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE MEMBER; )

KELLY OVERSTREET JOHNSON AS )
PRESIDENT, KENNETH L. MARVIN AS )
DIRECTOR OF LAWYER REGULATION, )
JOHN ANTHONY BOGGS AS DIRECTOR )
OF LAWYER REGULATION; LORRAINE )
CHRISTINE HOFFMAN AS BAR COUNSEL; )

ERIC MONTEL TURNER AS CHIEF )
BRANCH DISCIPLINE COUNSEL; AND )
JOY A. BARTMON AS CHAIR OF A )
GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE )

That Eliot I. Bernstein and P. Stephen Lamont (collectively “Petitioners”) hereby
supplement the Motion for:

Declaratory Relief; Intervene in Third Party Investigations of the Boca Raton Police Department, The Federal Bureau of Investigation, and the Securities and Exchange Commission With the Court’s Oversight; and an Emergency Hearing for the Immediate Protective Custody of Eliot I. Bernstein, Candice M. Bernstein, P. Stephen Lamont, P. Stephen Lamont II and Sophia Rana dated October 7, 2004
(“October 7 Motion”), and state as follows:

1. That on October 7th 2004, Petitioners received a voice mail message, Exhibit “A”,
from Assistant Chief James Burke (“Assistant Chief Burke”) of the Boca Raton Police
Department (“Boca PD”) advising Petitioners of contact names at the United States
Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) that were the contacts that were supposed to have received information from the Boca Raton PD and the States Attorney over one year ago and were to have attended a meeting at the Boca PD on October 6th 2004 scheduled by Assistant Chief Burke with the FBI and SEC, to assign investigatory duties.

2. That Assistant Chief Burke’s reasons for delivering contact names to Petitioners was
to confirm the attendees to be present from the SEC at the meeting at the Boca PD on
October 8, 2004 and in regard to those certain written statements submitted by Petitioners
to the Boca PD concerning the misappropriation and conversion of up to One Million
Dollars ($1,000,000) in funds of Iviewit Holdings, Inc. (“Iviewit”) and the
misappropriation of intellectual property of Iviewit.

3. That, directly after receiving those contact names, Petitioners telephoned the most
senior person involved, a one William Riley (850) 410-9805, of the SEC’s Tallahassee
office, that according to the message left by Burke that Mr. Riley was supposed to have
received information from Doreen Mosemer (305) 982-6301 regarding the investigation.

4. That Mr. Riley, after reviewing a database of cases shared with the West Palm Beach,
Ft. Lauderdale, and Miami branches of the SEC finds no case in the names of either
Petitioners, Iviewit, or any matter pertaining thereto delivered by the Boca PD or the
unidentified States Attorney referenced in the October 7 Motion. Mr. Riley further stated
that he was never informed of any meeting at the Boca PD and had no information
regarding such meeting.

5. That subsequent to the call with Riley, Petitioner was contacted by Doreen Mosemer
whom stated that she knew nothing of the matter and that she was never informed of a
meeting at the Boca PD and literally had no idea what Petitioner was talking about
concerning such scheduled meeting.

6. That these series of events leave Petitioner further convinced that the Boca PD was
not truthful when calling Petitioner to schedule a meeting and that the intent may have
been far more devious than stated to Petitioner by Assistant Chief Burke and further
confirms that the information being given to Petitioner was inaccurate and false.

Most disturbing is that Burke had claimed to have contacted the SEC and assured attendance
originally and that subsequently upon questioning the story became more and more
convoluted giving one the impression that the Boca PD had arranged such meeting to
intimidate Petitioner into not filing with Chief Scott a formal internal affairs investigation request.

That combined with the false statement that Chief Scott was personally involved
and oversight to such meeting and Petitioner case and then Chief Scott’s denial of such
involvement or any knowledge of Petitioner’s case, that this presents clear and present
danger that until such information is clarified and investigated fully, that Petitioner’s
lives may in fact be in danger if the objective was to cover up for misdeeds by the Boca
PD and others.

7. Finally, Petitioner has received no return call from Special Agent Stephen Lucchesi at
the Federal Bureau of Investigation regarding his participation or involvement in such
meeting supposedly arranged and for over one week all calls and faxes have been
ignored.

This may present even more disturbing problems. It is presumed at this point
by Petitioner that the conspirators named in the complaint from various powerful law
firms and other powerful corporate concerns so named in the conspiracy, may in fact
have bribed or positioned to estoppel due process at other state and federal agencies
through devious means such as is alleged regarding the conflicts of interest and
appearance of impropriety at two state bar associations now being reviewed in the Florida
Supreme Court and the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division: Second
Department.

That if similar events have occurred at Federal and State investigatory
agencies to block due process, and if these events are close to being uncovered, that the
immediacy for state ordered protective custody of Petitioner’s is evident.
Wherefore, Petitioners reiterate their request that this Court:

(i) enter an order granting a motion for declaratory relief from the Boca PD and Flechaus as to their investigations of the subject matter of the written statements, their review with an
unidentified District Attorney, and their joint submission to the Miami office of the SEC,
and declaratory relief from the FBI as to their submission of their report to the United
States attorney for the Southern District of Florida;

(ii) enter an order granting a motion for the Court’s intervention in the investigations of the Boca PD, the SEC, if any, and the FBI; and (iii) enter an order granting a motion for an emergency hearing for immediate protective custody Eliot I. Bernstein, Candice M. Bernstein, Joshua P. Stephen Lamont, and P. Stephen Lamont II, and such further relief that the Court deems appropriate.

EXHIBIT “A” MESSAGE ASSISTANT CHIEF OF POLICE JIM BURKE LEFT ON VOICE MAIL ON OCTOBER 7TH 2004

“Eliot Assistant Chief Jim Burke with Boca Raton Police Department I stated I would
provide you phone numbers for the people at the SEC who have the information on your
case.

The first individual is Doreen Mosemer 305 982 6301 I believe she forwarded your
investigation up to Tallahassee to a William Riley his number is 850 410 9805 that’s the
SEC’s representatives um that’s all I can find you for I tried to set up meeting again the
SEC contact numbers, you should have the FBI contact numbers and you have our
contact numbers, good luck.”

This 8th day of October 2004.
Attorney for Petitioners
Eliot I. Bernstein, Pro Se

Eliot I. Bernstein
P. Stephen Lamont, Pro Se



Source of Post
www.Iviewit.TV