What is Stephen Lamont's Plan B - is it Legal - Does Stephen Lamont have this Authority? Why is a Supposed Ex-CEO causing such a Conflict?

Why is P. Stephen Lamont still acting as if he is CEO of Iviewit, is HE? Has he proved this to you with the Correct, Proper, Legal Documentation?

It seems to me that Stephen Lamont is Rogue on all this and just trying to stir things up, do you want to take a chance of doing something Illegal?

Yes their is Corruption in the Courts, yes their is Illegal Behavoir - Stolen Patents - Corrupt Patent Attorneys - Tech Companies who so Far are Above the Law - However, you still must wait for the Slow moving wheels of the United States Justice System and NOT be tempted into Illegal behavior. the Truth will Surface. And it will do so in a Legal, Ethical Way and those in the US Court system who are NOT corrupt will ONE day abide by the great laws of the United States and do the Right thing. Until then, do not become one of those acting illegally or outside of the laws.... get your Proof... your documentation... before you Trust the Latest Lamont Email Circulating... Funny many sources now seem to be sending me this email...

Why is there only One Seeming Outsider in the Iviewit Technoligies Drama? The Backbiting needs to Stop and the Proof needs to simply be laid out to the courts... and this Plan B... well.. it sounds pretty mysterious and Rogue to Me... be Careful Folks..

Again .. I am in NO WAY asking you to believe me, I am asking for you to do your homework and get your facts to you keep out of harms way...

Here is Todays Email Drama:

"" Subject: Iviewit Shareholder Vote Results
Importance: High

Attached, and not withstanding the vote to select Option 3 below (exclusively by default), at CEO discretion I will direct towards Option 2 if and when and it might come to fruition (Plan B forthcoming).

However, for those of you who wish to operate exclusively through Eliot Bernstein’s psychologically unstable personality and “game plan,” please send me an “opt out” message by Wednesday, March 3, 2010.

By “opting out,” the caveat is if and when Plan B comes to fruition, and if any settlement or damage awards are accrued through Plan B, those “opting out” will be left to their own recourse to recover.

Questions?

Best regards,

P. Stephen Lamont
Chief Executive Officer
Iviewit Technologies, Inc.
175 King Street
Armonk, N.Y. 10504
Tel: 914-217-0038
Email: pstephen.lamont@verizon.net; pstephen.lamont@att.blackberry.net
URL: www.linkedin.com/in/pstephenlamont; www.myspace.com/pstephenlamont; http://www.iviewit.tv/

......

The going forward options presently are:

1. Press onto the U.S. Supreme Court;
2. Await the coming of Plan B (currently operating in stealth mode);
3. Sit tight and wait for the criminal side to act (default option).

Discretion of CEO remains, but responses are due by Wednesday, February 17, 2010; no responses default to option 3.

Best regards,

P. Stephen Lamont
Chief Executive Officer
Iviewit Technologies, Inc.
175 King Street
Armonk, N.Y. 10504
Tel: 914-217-0038
Email: pstephen.lamont@verizon.net; pstephen.lamont@att.blackberry.net
URL: www.linkedin.com/in/pstephenlamont; www.myspace.com/pstephenlamont; http://www.iviewit.tv/ ""

Do your Own Homework.. do not Rely on My Opinion
as ANY Investment or LEGAL Advice...
Think for Your Self....

I am posting this here for your information, and in no way to retaliate for Stephen Lamont Joining a Hate Group against me or Threatening My Life. I feel you have a right to this information and Transparency. Your Millions upon Million of Shareholder Money is at Stake.

I have been blogging on the iViewit Stolen Patent for over two months now, it is important to me. I shall continue to do so regardless of the Threats P. Stephen Lamont has made on my Life or the Evidence of the Hate Group he joined or started Defaming my Real Estate Company and ME personally.

One more Note here, from My Perspective and reading the documents that Eliot Bernstein has legally presented to the US Judicial System, it appears that Eliot Bernstein's game plan is Based in Law, in Fact, in True and Correct Evidence and is Very Stable. Read as many documents as you can and Make up your Own Mind for Yourself.

Eliots "plan" and documents is all out in the open and with no secret code names Plan B or other mysterious, possibly illegal methods to attempt to pursue more fraud on the US Courts. Eliot Bernstein is the Founder of the iViewit Company and Well, are you going to Stand with the Owner or someone he fired long ago... ??? Your Decision...


Crystal L. Cox
Investigative Blogger.....
crystal cox blogs

Who has the Authority Right NOW to Speak and Act on Behalf of Iviewit Techologies?

Folks Do your Homework, Soon to be Posted the Iviewit Corporation Papers and More on the Fact that Stephen Lamont has NO Authority to be Communicated with Shareholders and Courts, in my understanding. Make sure that you find out the Truth for yourself before you listen to or provide any action on behalf of Getting your Iviewit "Return on Investment".

You may be doing something illegal.

I am not asking you to believe me, I am suggesting you get the paperwork that Proves who can makes these kinds of Decisions for the Iviewit Technologies Company....

There is a Reason for the Smoke and Mirrors that Stephen Lamont is throwing up, in my opinion, he is contacting shareholders to keep things stirred up and keep litigation and courts tied up to stall the pending Trillion Dollar Liability to MPEGLA LLC, Kenneth Rubenstein - Foley and Lardner - Steven Becker - Proskauer Rose.... there may be others he is assisting, but in my personal opinion based on my experience of years of watching my statcounter, I Believe Stephen Lamont is in Close Contact with these Three as well as the USPTO offices...

www.Iviewit.com

http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/

crystal cox blogs

Eliot Bernstein - Iviewit Technologies Reporting Stephen Lamont to the New York Attorney General

To Steven Michael Cohen
Counselor and Chief of Staff
New York Attorney General

Dated: June 18th, 2009

Re: First Department Obstruction of Justice

Letter to Steven M. Cohen, NYAG
From Eliot I. Bernstein Founder and Inventor
I~view~it Technologies, INC
I~view~it Holdings,Inc

This Letter is About Obstruction of Justice, Conflicts of Interest and More.. This Letter to the NYAG also includes information on Eliot Bernstein, Founder and One of the Inventors of the Iviewit Technologies Inc. - Complaining to the NYAG that Stephen Lamont has been requested to cease making representations of behalf of Iviewit and its Share Holders... Read FULL Document Below - and Decide the Truth for Yourself.

Click Here for Document

posted here by
Crystal L. Cox

Investigative Blogger

Industry Whistleblower

Need to Know More about Iviewit Technologies and Who has the authority to do What?

Internal Iviewit Document ... Proskauer Rose LLP, Christopher Wheeler - Proskauer Rose Attorney, Billing, Incorporation, Investment and Shareholder information and well, a Mega Need to Know Document... to help you to understand WHO has the authority to do what in regard to and on behalf of the Iviewit Company ... who billed what to whom and ... well, Lot's of Information.

Click Here for Document

it is Rather Large - Give it a Few ... to Load..

Posted by

Crystal L. Cox

Investigative Blogger

On What or Whose Authority is P. Stephen Lamont Acting On?

Why is Stephen Lamont Threatening to End the Affairs of Investigative Blogger Crystal L. Cox? Why is Stephen Lamont Demanding that I Copy him on my emails to anyone regarding the Iviewit Company?

Why in the World would Stephen Lamont Threat my Life, and my "Affairs", just because I posted a document and words THAT were NOT mine... ???

Does Stephen Lamont have the Legal Authority
to Speak on behalf of the Iviewit Company?

Can P. Stephen Lamont Legally File Federal Documents to QUASH Eliot Bernstein's Motion .. when Mr. Lamont was Fired, Long .. Long ago ?

Iviewit, Eliot Bernstein Says:

" Lamont was not approved by any board, as the board disbanded illegally and without noticing the shareholders and so I hired lamont and offered him stock in the company. Later we learned from Garber and other law firms that we could not act on behalf of Iviewit in official capacity until the books and corporate records were fixed, approximately 50k and that is why lamont claims he was advised by counsel to work outside the company and not as an officer, as he legally was never an officer."

More on Iviewit.. and Lamont
http://www.deniedpatent.com/2010/02/p-stephen-lamont-friend-or-foe-of.html

Posted by
Investigative Blogger
Crystal L. Cox
Industry Whistleblower

This is not My Story .. it is However, the Greatest Patent Story every Told, and well I find it intriguing So I post about it.. I Found the Information on www.Iviewit.TV where the story has been running for 8 Years.

I link to that site in Which Stephen Lamont also promotes.

SO why threaten me for posting information from that site and directly from the REAL owner .. and one of the Inventors of the Iviewit Patent.. Why Terrorize me for simply reading a Website and posting pieces of it on my site and linking to the site...??

Why has, P. Stephen Lamont, an Alleged Former CEO of Iviewit Technologies Inc. Threatened me for posting information that is not mine.

And it is Reported to ME that Stephen Lamont has Joined and or Created a Hate Group, and is actively recruiting others to join him in this group that is threatening to Incarcerate me, Burn Me at the Stake, Ruin Me, and Telling Lie upon Lie about me.. and my Business.. all because I Posted Excerpts from the Iviewit Website.

I just don't Understand.
I have no Bad intentions.

I am simply writing about an 8 Year Old Stolen Patent Story
that is and has been already on the Web for 8 years....

Not my Story...
I am Just a Modern Day
Investigate Journalist.. which means
I Read..
I Post...
that Simple..

Say you Owned a Company and an Investigative Blogger Was Researching and Writing on Your Comany...

Would you Want the Investigative Blogger to get Information from News Sources, Your Website and From you the Owner of the Company... or would you want that Investigative Blogger to get information from Someone you fired Long, Long ago?

Think About it.. I prefer the Source...

Crystal L. Cox
Investigative Blogger

P. Stephen Lamont - Now Suspected to be Hiding IP on AOL

Why.. ? the Truth is the TRUTH .. fact is fact...

Why not search and post with Honest, Open, Integrity?

anyway AOL Serve Obsessed Today with this POST
http://www.deniedpatent.com/2010/02/stephen-lamont-searching-crystal-l-cox.html

Obey the Law
Tell the Truth
Stand Up for Victims
Do the Right Thing...
That Simple

Crystal L. Cox
Investigative Blogger

Was P. Stephen Lamont Really The CEO of the Iviewit Technologies Company

In the Quest to see if P. Stephen Lamont is working for or against the Iviewit Shareholders and the Iviewit Inventors. I have to ask and research such questions.

Also did Stephen Lamont Really go to Columbia, Does P. Stephen Lamont have a Law Degree? Has Stephen Lamont Being deliberate sabatoging the Iviewit Inventors, Company and Shareholders from the Begining... ???

Who in the Trillion Dollar Patent Heist is Stephen Lamont actually working for, with or against? Where is the FBI, the SEC, the FTC, and the Department of Justice. This is Trillions of Dollars and Shareholders Stand to Lose Billions... where is the United States Justice System??

Questions SOON to be answered.. if you have any VALID information on this, please email Crystal L. Cox - Investigative Blogger at Crystal@CrystalCox.com


More on the Iviewit Stolen Patent Case at

www.DeniedPatent.com

www.Iviewit.TV and http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/
Iviewit Stolen Patent Case
Where is Mary Schapiro

Stephen Lamont Searching ( "Crystal L. Cox" Lamont)

Did Stephen Lamont Really Just Discover that I was Blogging on Iviewit?

If So how involved is he really? I mean if he does not know what is going on in the Blogsphere and claims to be an Intellectual Property Guru and Tech Savvy.. well then who is he to Quash any MOTION by the REAL players in the Iviewit Stolen Patent Case who Really are on the Right side of the Law, the Right Side of the Moral Compass.

Why is Rye, New York - Assumed to Be P. Stephen Lamont Searching for "Crystal L. Cox" Lamont and what did he find ?

Crystal L. Cox
Investigative Blogger
if you have any Information on
anything I am Writing on .. please email me at
Crystal@CrystalCox.com
crystal cox blogger

Is Stephen Lamont, Former Alleged CEO, of Iviewit Conspiring with Foley and Lardner, the USPTO and other Players in the Iviewit Stolen Patent Case ???

It is Simply To Hard for Me to Wrap my Brain around the Actions of Stephen Lamont.

I Could not Figure out what possible Motive Stephen Lamont could have to Attempt to Discredit My Blog Postings and to Discredit Eliot Bernstein, when the Information on the Web from those two sources would only benefit P. Stephen Lamont up until he Threatened Me.

I just could not understand why Stephen Lamont would DEMAND that I remove Posts with his name, when those Posts were information from the www.Iviewit.TV Website that he links to in his every email, seemingly. and in which he seems to promote on the Internet with his my Space page and other online outlets of promotion.

So Why in the World would Stephen Lamont Threaten Me and Tell me to get My Affairs in order while I still can.. ?? and demand that I change my Blogs.. ?? when the Facts of the Story came from www.Iviewit.TV in which he promotes ?

It Simply Did not Make Sense to me.

In trying to figure out Why P. Stephen Lamont is Aggressively Demanding and Threatening me Now after 2 months of Blogging about the Iviewit Stolen Patent, and after the information has seemingly been on the Internet for over 8 years... I just had to Look Deeper...

I found myself needing to know more, and asking myself who is Stephen Lamont working with, why NOW?, what changed?

Did someone contact him and tell him to play big shot CEO and try and scare me with Demanding and Threatening Emails?

Did Stephen Lamont get orders from the USPTO - Foley and Lardner or some other Play in the Iviewit Stolen Patent Case?

P. Stephen Lamont is obviously a very smart man and surely saw me covering this story for around 2 months so far. Right ?

A guy who claims he wants to take over video.. blah .. blah .. blah.. online and the world this and that.. Surely he saw my Blogs, surely he looked into who and what I am about.. and Surely Stephen Lamont did not all of the Sudden wake up to my Righteous Stance on the Behalf of the Iviewit Shareholders, and the Iviewit Inventors ... On February 4th 2010, The day he was in Such a Stir about the email that Eliot Bernstein Sent out.

So Why did Stephen Lamont launch Demands and Threats on Crystal L. Cox, Investigative Blogger - when I was and have been for two months... out to Defend HIM, the company he was supposedly CEO of, and him getting his rightful compensation for the Iviewit Shares in which he deserves, Along with the Inventors and other Shareholders of the Iviewit Technologies Inc. ????

It seems to me that Stephen Lamont is running a Bluff at me, possibly for Someone Else. It Seems to Me that P. Stephen Lamont wants this "Hillbilly Blogger" to believe he has powers that he does not have in a Company which he is no longer a part of other then being a Shareholder as many other Shareholders....

Kind of makes you wonder who P. Stephen Lamont is Really Working for... could it be one of the Billionaire Tech Companies - Billionaire Law Firms or ?

I mean if the Tech companies can afford Millions on Top of Millions - in Anti-Trust Violation fines every year, often every Quarter and the Law Firms such as Proskauer Rose can pay 1.5 million as a minimum a month in rent in once location and they are Global..

These Companies involved in this Trillion Dollar Stolen patent.. they have some serious money.. why not use some of it to try and Run a Bluff on some Woman.. by sending in someone with a big Fancy CEO Title of the Company your Talking about to discredit the very people you have been defending for 2 months so far.. Why not Send in someone I may think is the CEO - or somehow I may think is in Charge of the Iviewit Company?

Surely this will Shut me UP.. Right?

and If that don't Work well Stephen Lamont
will just Threat to End my Affairs...

So Again Why NOW.. ???

this information on my Investigative Blogs
is Public Knowledge, it is in the Courts, in the News,
and all over the www.Iviewit.TV website.. so why now?
Why Me?

Maybe, Possibly, Just speculating here .. maybe the Super Power Elite told P. Stephen Lamont that the Iviewit Inventors would NEVER get their rights and the SHAREHOLDERS will never get paid, however maybe he could get something out of the deal.. just speculating here..

Maybe .. just maybe someone offered P. Stephen Lamont Money to work on the other side and make it look like he was working for the best interest of the Iviewit Shareholders and the REAL Iviewit Inventors.

But anyone with a brain can see that currently Eliot Bernstein and P. Stephen Lamont are not quite on the same page, so why would I think that P. Stephen Lamont could speak for Eliot Bernstein or the Iviewit Technologies Company.

If P. Stephen Lamont is disputing the information I posted, and that in which contains his name then why does every email to every person he emails and his resume, and his My Space Page contain the www.Iviewit.TV website ... as if it is his site, he is proud of it and Well ... Gee.. Hmmm... I got the information from that site and linked to the source...

So What is Really Going on with P. Stephen Lamont? Who is P. Stephen Lamont Talking to and on Whose Authority his he Demanding anything of me?

Well I can Tell you that Right After I posted this post.

http://www.industrywhistleblower.com/
2010/02/p-stephen-lamont-friend-or-foe-of_05.html

A Story of Intrigue and Suspense Unfolded Before my Eyes.. and Not Just the Threats and Demands from P. Stephen Lamont, but also of Who he Told, where they were and What Connections and Fingerprints he left along the way..

Well .. My Stat Counter Told me a Story .. that I feel I must Share..

I feel from My Own Personal Experience in Analyzing my Stats over the Years, and in my Opinion that once P. Stephen Lamont Seen the Above Post... he then Contacted the USPTO, Foley and Lardner, Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe, Duval & Stachenfeld, Steven C. Becker and
"Crystal L. Cox" Lamont
Well Click Here and Read the Story...

posted by Investigative Blogger
Crystal L. Cox
Lamont Iviewit
Tags: Connecting the Dots, Former CEO Lamont, Lamont Connections, P. Stephen Lamont, Stephen Lamont,Foley and Lardner, David Kappos USPTO, Duval and Stachenfeld, Orrick Herrington and Sutcliffe, Steven C. Becker,

Why Would Former iViewit CEO - P. Stephen Lamont ATTEMPT to Quash Motion by Eliot Bernstein?

Investigative Blogger Crystal L. Cox
Questions the Intentions, Integrity,
Morals and Connections of P. Stephen Lamont.

Why - 8 Years into the Iviewit Battle for the Rights of the Shareholders and Inventors would a Former CEO of Iviewit Technologies be filing Court Documents to Quash Eliot Bernstein's Motion?

P. Stephen Lamont being a Shareholder would Seem to benefit from the Iviewit Technologies Inc. Getting their Rights and the Inventors Getting Rights to their Patents...

The Question then is, Did P. Stephen Lamont Give up on Standing on the Right side of the Moral Compass and On standing on the Right side of the Law and on the side of the Rights of the Inventors and the Shareholders?

And with this did P. Stephen Lamont join with those who stole the patent in some attempt to get anything out of this "Iviewit Thing"? Who is Stephen Lamont Talking to and Why?

There are only 2 sides of the Iviewit Stolen Patent Case The One Side that is Lawful, Legal, Ethical and Moral and the OTHER Side which is Unlawful, Illegal, Immorral and UnEthical. Today I am Seriously Perplexed as to which Side Stephen Lamont is Standing on.
Which One of the Players in this Trillion Dollar Heist is P. Stephen Lamont Talking To?

Who is P. Stephen Lamont FORMOR Iviewit CEO really working for or with now? It Makes No Sense Do me. Stephen Lamont is now trying to STOP Eliot Bernstein in the Courts, Why?

Click Here to Read Document

Also One has to Again Ask Why Now?

Suddenly Stephen Lamont comes, seemingly out of
no where and joins on the opposite team of Eliot Bernstein.

P. Stephen Lamont Seems to stand on the Opposite side of the Moral Compass and is going to notify authorities of Eliot Bernstein's alleged acts, Why Now? What Acts, what is Going On?

If this Stuff is TRUE why would P. Stephen Lamont wait 8 years to tell the Authorities. I mean the mysterious "Authorities" in all this, well all they have to do is read all the proof and you can see that The Illegal Behavior is Obvious and Seriously Piling Up... and has been for at least 8 Years and the "Authorities" have done NOTHING to enforce the Laws of the United State of America, and Why?

Well Corrupt Courts, Corrupt Judges, Favored Attorneys, Conflicts of Interest and well a whole lot of reasons that have nothing to do with the Rule of LAW, the Real Laws, the Constitution of the United States and the Real Facts of the Iviewit Stolen Patent Case.

All this stuff in the last week leads me to believe that possibly Lamont has been on the Wrong Side of this for Years, and Well something - somehow blew his Cover... It was NOT me.. for the Iviewit Documents had been OUT THERE for 8 years... I post them and P. Stephen Lamont TELLS me to Get My Affairs in Order.. .while I Still have Affairs... WHAT?

What is Really Going on with P. Stephen Lamont and who in this High Finance, Trillion Dollar Patent Heist is P. Stephen Lamont REALLY teamed up with... ???

If you have any information on all this...
please Email Investigative Blogger
Crystal L. Cox at Crystal@CrystalCox.com

Crystal

Former Iviewit Technologies CEO, P. Stephen Lamont Tells Investigative Blogger - Whistleblower Crystal L. Cox to Get Affairs in Order.

The Iviewit Stolen Patent Case Involves some of the Wealthiest Tech Companies in the World such as Intel. Corp, IBM, Sony and other major media companies such as Warner Bros. and Time Warner Inc., and AOL, SGI, MPEG LA ... and many more.

the Iviewit Stolen Patent Case involves Major, Big Money Law Firms connected to the Wealthiest Corporations in the World Such as Foley and Lardner LLP, Proskuaer Rose LLP, Greenberg Traurig, and more ....

Also in the Iviewit Stolen Patent Case We have Major CEO's, High Powered General Counsel's of Major Corporations, HUGE Medial Relations and PR companies and well the Biggest of the Big in Finance, News, Investments, Tech Companies, Politics and Law Firms.

None whom have emailed or Threatened me
in any way thus far into my Iviewit Stolen Patent Writings.
Blog

The Players in this Stolen Patent Case have Political Connections, Connections in the Defense Department, Homeland Security, the Bradley Foundation, the Bush Administration and Well they have the most money and most power in the Entire World and NONE of them have emailed me, sent me a Cease and Desist, Called my Home
or Threatened me in any way.

So you can Imagine my Complete Surprise when an Iviewit Insider Called my Home, left no message and sent me an email that I deem as a Death Threat.

It may not seem that way to you but it sure feels that way to me.
iviewit

P. Stephen Lamont told me basically to get my Affairs in Order and other talk about emails I have no idea what he is talking about.
Stephen Lamont Emails ME

I have posted all Correspondence from P. Stephen Lamont to me, Crystal L. Cox ~ Industry Whistleblower on this Blog and several other of my Industry Whistle Blower sites.

Up until a few days ago I thought that P. Stephen Lamont was on the side of getting the Shareholders their rightful money and getting the Inventors the Rights to their Patent, another words ... Up Until a Few Days ago I thought P. Stephen Lamont was on the
Right Side of the Law, and the Right Side of the Moral Compass.

However, Now I am seriously confused as to what
P. Stephen Lamont's motive's are.
iviewit

You can plainly see from this site and my other writings on the iViewit Stolen Patent case, that I am writing to simply to expose the facts, the court documents and related information to get this Shocking Story of Court Corruption, Attorney Favoritism, US Patent Fraud, and Corruption in the US Court System ... told .. as well as to stand up for the little guy and not little guy like you may thinking.. a Case of Millionaires, Investors and Inventors Vs. Billionaires, Political and Financial Elite and the Courts and Attorneys that Keep them In Business....

the Iviewit company invested Millions upon Millions, as did the SBA and Related banks such as Wachovia, as well as investors like Ellen Degeneres and tons more who are iviewit Shareholders denied of their rights, their money seemingly Stolen by a Corrupt Patent Office, Court Corruption, and Attorneys Covering Up Each others Lies and Illegal Behavoir.

So why would a Former CEO be causing such a Stir ?
And Why Now ?
iviewit patent case

Why would a FORMER CEO be trying to get me to stop writing about anything? It is not really his Current Concern is it? Other then Shareholder money which many other Shareholders hope they see some day.

Why would a Formor Iviewit Technologies CEO Demand that I include him in all correspondence on the iViewit Company and Include him on ANY and ALL correspondence with the Owner of the iViewit Company - and one of the Inventors of the iViewit Technology?

Does a Former CEO have a Right to Make such Requests?

Ok well here is Today's Email.. of Which It Sounds to Me Like I had Better Get My Affairs in Order While I still can, According to P. Stephen Lamont.

************
Crystal Cox Blogger
Stephen Lamont Phoned My Home Last Night
He Left No Message, Today He Sent me
This Threatening Email
from lamont

" Ms. Cox:

I understand you have transmitted an email, which I have not received.

As I indicate below, continue your investigation, and if you come up with even one incidence where I have caused harm to Iviewit shareholders in our quest to own the video and imaging world then we can begin a dialogue.

Until then, however, you have been put on notice to remove my name from your various blog sites, and I will expect you will govern your affairs accordingly, while you still have some affairs to govern, that is.

Best regards,

P. Stephen Lamont
Chief Executive Officer
Iviewit Technologies, Inc.
175 King Street
Armonk, N.Y. 10504
Tel: 914-217-0038
Email: pstephen.lamont@verizon.net; pstephen.lamont@att.blackberry.net
URL: www.linkedin.com/in/pstephenlamont; www.myspace.com/pstephenlamont; http://www.iviewit.tv/ "

I know many of you wonder Why don't I tell the FBI, however the FBI does not Care, I have told them of Criminal Activity before and they don't bother to respond, or look into it and seem to have local law in the area of the Crime simple make the Criminal Look like the Good Guy.
crystal l. cox
I can only suspect that the FBI themselves are controlled just as all the Other High Courts, Judges, Huge Law Firms, Patent Office, Supreme Court and others that are Keeping this Trillion Dollar Patent Theft a Secret from Shareholders, Investors and Refusing to Give the Inventors the Rights to what they invented, Though This Big Boys having been using the Technology for Years upon Years...
Crystal Cox Blog
In the email above from P. Stephen Lamont to Crystal L. Cox, The part about an email that I have Transmitted and he has not received, that is so cryptic and kind of funny - I have no idea what it means as I have sent tons of emails in which he has not received - for they were not to him. I have no idea what he is Talking About.
Crystal L Cox
He talks about my "investigation" what does that mean?
blog
I am pretty much an investigative journalist, I research and I post, I am not conducting some sort of Official "investigation" and again have no idea what P. Stephen Lamont is Getting At here.
Crystal L. Cox
In my opinion, from my research, I don't understand how P. Stephen Lamont thinks he is any part of owning the video and imaging world, he WAS a CEO, he is a Shareholder.. that's it.
crystal l cox
I mean if your hired on as a CEO does that mean you own, run and control a Company?
crystal cox
Can a Former CEO go Seemingly Rogue and initiate Legal Complaints, and make Demands on behalf of a Company he is no longer affiliated with other then owning shares?
Iviewit Stolen Patent Case
If so, then all the iViewit Shareholders would seemingly have that same right.
Stolen Patent
It just does not Make Sense.
Iviewit
P. Stephen Lamont Now Phoning me and Sending me Cryptic, Threatening Emails after 2 months of writing on the Iviewit Stolen Patent, well, I just don't understand it.
Crystal Cox
Surely a Smart man like P. Stephen Lamont
Seen My Sites before Feb. 4th.
Patent
SO What Changed, Why Now ?
Crystal L. Cox
If you have any information on the Motives of P. Stephen Lamont,
please email our Whistle blower Hot line at Crystal@CrystalCox.com

crystal l cox

Today is Feb 5th 2009 and P. Stephen Lamont's MySpace Page Says..

"" P. Stephen Lamont's Companies
Iviewit Technologies, Inc.
Armonk, NY US
Chief Executive Officer Corporate
12/2001-Present ""

Link to Above QUOTE
http://www.myspace.com/pstephenlamont

Ok, so P. Stephen Lamont says he is the Chief Executive Officer, CEO of Iviewit Technologies, Inc. in Armonk, NY - WHAT? Who owns Iviewit Technologies, Inc ? Who owns the DBA, the Corporation.. who is in Charge of the Iviewit Technologies, Inc Company ? Who is "Authorized" to act upon the behalf of the Iviewit Shareholders?

What is Going On Really? I mean is P. Stephen Lamont acting outside of his authority, does P. Stephen Lamont have a Right to continue claiming to be a CEO of a Company, if those who own the Company say he was fired and is NOT the Current Chief Executive Officer ?

Much more on the Corporate Structure of the Iviewit Company and P. Stephen Lamont Coming Soon. For now for more information on the Iviewit Stolen Patent Case go to my Blog on this Topic at www.DeniedPatent.com

Crystal L. Cox

This one is as of Sept. 09 P. Stephen Lamont acting as if he is still CEO of the Iviewit Company. Who Really has the RIGHT to act on Behalf of Iviewit

"CEO Lamont Demands Federal Intervention

CEO Lamont Demands Federal Intervention Category: Web, HTML, Tech
IVIEWIT HOLDINGS, INC.

........

P. Stephen Lamont
Chief Executive Officer
Direct Dial: 914-217-0038

By Overnight Mail (o), Facsimile (f) and Certified Delivery (c)

September 23, 2009

The Hon. Eric H. Holder, Jr. (o) The Hon. Preet Bharara (c)
Attorney General of the United States United States Attorney for
Office of the Attorney General District of New York
United States Department of Justice United States Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. One St. Andrews Plaza
Washington, D.C. 20530-0001 New York, New York 10007

Hon. William M. Welch II (c) The Hon. John L. Sampson (f)
Chief, Public Integrity Unit Chairman, New York State Senate
United States Department of Justice Judiciary Committee
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W 409 Legislative Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20530-0001 Albany, NY 12247


RE: Request for Federal Intervention into Allegations of Corruption and Appointment of Federal Monitor.

Gentlemen:

By way of introduction, I am P. Stephen Lamont, Chief Executive Officer of Iviewit Holdings, Inc., and its subsidiaries, affiliates, and related parties (“Iviewit”), and pursuant to my fiduciary duties, I respectfully request your offices to: (i) attend the New York State Senate’s Standing Committee on the Judiciary’s Thursday, September 24, 2009 hearing concerning The Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee (“1st DDC”), the grievance committees of the various Judicial Districts (collectively, the “DDC’s”), and the New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct (“CJC”), where you will hear testimony related to the commission of Federal crimes by and between and the 1st DDC, the DCC’s, the CJC and aggrieved citizens of the State of New York; (ii) once you have digested such testimony, and by the body(ies) of appropriate jurisdiction, the eventual issuance of a temporary injunction and a preliminary injunction enjoining the State of New York from further administration of the 1st DDC, the DDC’s, and the CJC and the insertion of a Federal monitor to administer such agencies in lieu of State administration; and (iii) the appointment of a Special Prosecutor to investigate such allegations of the commission of Federal crimes and the eventual prosecution of same.

As a case in point, the following describes the experiences of Iviewit with the aforementioned New York State agencies:

I. Iviewit Technology

The series of events proximate to the instant circumstances herein surrounds the sabotage of the multimedia inventions of Iviewit and the further alleged cover-up of that patent sabotage by the many attorneys, public officers, and members of the judiciary within and outside of the State of New York.

To begin, I would like to make it clear that Iviewit is not referring to some rudimentary software that will be rendered obsolete as newer versions emerge, but that the Iviewit video scaling and image overlay systems (“IP”) are THE backbone, enabling technologies for the encoding and transmission of video and images across all networks and viewable on all display devices, an elegant upstream solution (towards the content creator) of reconfiguring video frames to unlock bandwidth, processing, and storage constraints presently in use by cable MSO’s, satellite MSO’s, telco MSO’s, and terrestrial networks, among a host of others. On the imaging side, presently in use by all those hardware manufacturers of image and/or video capture devices and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (Mars Rover images), Iviewit stakes the claim as the inventors of digital zoom.

II. ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE COMPLAINTS FILED

1st DDC

In or about February 2003, and in my capacity as Chief Executive Officer of Iviewit, I was a party to attorney misconduct complaints against Kenneth Rubenstein of Proskauer Rose LLP (“Proskauer”), Proskauer, Raymond A. Joao, Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolf & Schlissel LLP (“MLG”) filed with the 1st DDC, that were mired in undisclosed conflicts, improprieties, and violations of public offices of the 1st DDC from the outset. The attorney discipline response of Rubenstein was authored by Steven C. Krane of Proskauer who, upon information and belief, held positions at the 1st DDC and other disciplinary agencies at the time of the response making his representation a conflict of interest and violation of public offices.

In or about June 2003, and in my capacity of Chief Executive Officer of Iviewit, I was a party to a complaint against Steven C. Krane (“Krane”) for the above referenced conflicts and improprieties in the response for Rubenstein that imparted same on the now merged Joao complaint.

In or about June 2004, and in my capacity of Chief Executive Officer of Iviewit, I was a party to a complaint against Thomas J. Cahill, Chief Counsel of the 1st DDC, filed with the 1st DDC, Special Inquiry #2004.1122, as a result of Cahill’s knowing and willful false information supplied to Iviewit in an effort to protect Krane, that had since been stalled under the direction of persons unknown, and sat incommunicado in the offices of Special Counsel, Martin R. Gold, for investigation.

In or about June 2004, I was an individual movant in a Motion to the New York State Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department (“First Department Court”), inter alia, to begin immediate investigation of complaints against the above referenced attorneys and counselors-at-law. Subsequently, the First Department Court granted the Motion and in an unpublished order it was determined to move the complaints of Rubenstein, Proskauer, Krane, MLG, and Joao to the Appellate Division Second Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee (“2nd DDC”) as a result of conflicts and the appearance of impropriety. After thorough review of the subject matter, the First Department Court ordered the immediate investigation of the complaints against each attorney involved – Rubenstein M2820, Joao M3212, and Krane M3198, while the First Department Court ordered the Cahill complaint for a Special Inquiry #2004.1122 by Gold.

2nd DDC

On or about October 2004, the 2nd DDC summarily dismissed the complaints against Rubenstein, Proskauer, MLG, Joao and Krane, failing to conduct the First Department Court’s ordered investigation. In a discussion with Diana Maxwell Kearse, Chief Counsel of the 2nd DDC, Kearse stated that she and the 2nd DDC are not subject to the jurisdiction of the First Department Court and therefore could do as they please, or words to that effect; Kearse factually defies the Orders of the First Department Court so as to preclude the complaints against Rubenstein, Joao, and Krane.

DAMAGES SUFFERED

Were it not for Iviewit’s discovery of the conflict of interest and appearance of impropriety in Krane’s response for Rubenstein and Proskauer, the attorneys would have received discipline by reprimand, suspension, or disbarment, where such discipline would have been positively reflected in a variety of complaints across domestic and international agencies, but particularly the Iviewit intellectual property investigation being conducted by Harry I. Moatz, the Director of the Office of Enrollment and Discipline of the United States Patent and Trademark Office.
Were it not for the stalling of the Rubenstein and Joao complaints at the 1st DDC, and the unpublished nature of the First Department Court’s order, the transfer to an equally conflicted 2nd DDC, and the dismissal of the Rubenstein, Proskauer, Joao, Meltzer and Krane complaints by the 2nd DDC in reckless disregard for the Order of the First Department Court, Iviewit shareholders would not have suffered the damages of:

Emotional distress; and
Loss of consortium with their families; and
On a personal note, lost savings in the amount of approximately One Million Two Hundred and Fifty Thousand Dollars ($1,250,000); and
Lost value of the equity interest in the capital stock in Iviewit Holdings, Inc. in an amount that can approach One Trillion Dollars ($1,000,000,000,000).

Consequently, considering the above set of circumstances, the state of affairs in New York will never right itself absent Federal intervention, and Iviewit again respectfully requests: (i) the attendance, by individuals at your discretion, at the New York State’s Thursday, September 24, 2009 hearing; (ii) and once familiar with the state of affairs, the appointment of a Federal monitor to administer the 1st DDC, the DDC’s, and the CJC; and (iii) the appointment of a Special Prosecutor to investigate and prosecute the commission of these Federal crimes.

Thank you for your attention to these matters, and Iviewit looks forward to your earliest replies.

Very truly yours,

IVIEWIT HOLDINGS, INC.

....By:
Chief Executive Officer

Reply to Address:

35 Locust Avenue
Rye, N.Y. 10580



Cc: The Hon. David A. Paterson (c)
New York State Governor
Office of the Governor of New York State
State Capitol
Albany, New York 12224

The Hon. Boyd M. Johnson III (c)
Deputy United States Attorney for the
Southern District of New York
Public Corruption Unit
United States Department of Justice
One St. Andrew’s Plaza
New York, New York 10007

The Hon. Andrew M. Cuomo (c)
New York State Attorney General
Office of the Attorney General of New York State
The Capitol
Albany, New York 12224-0341

The Hon. Loretta Preska (c)
Chief U. S. District Judge
United States Courthouse
Southern District of New York
500 Pearl Street
New York, New York 10007-1312

The Hon. Luis A. Gonzales (c)
Presiding Justice, New York State Appellate Division, 1st Dept.
27 Madison Avenue
New York, New York 10010

The Hon. Joseph M. Demarest, Jr. (c)
Assistant Director in Charge, New York Division
Federal Bureau of Investigation
26 Federal Plaza, 23rd Floor
New York, New York 10278-0004

Source of Above QUOTE
http://blogs.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendId=114167543&blogId=511391360
Lamont - Iviewit
More on the Trillion Dollar Iviewit Stolen Patent at
www.Iviewit.TV - Eliot Bernstein's Website or
www.DeniedPatent.com the Blog of Crystal L. Cox Industry Whistleblower
Crystal L. Cox

Acting as the Current CEO of the Iviewit Technologies, Inc. P. Stephen Lamont Demands Federal Intervention..

"January 07, 2010


By Electronic Mail and Facsimile

Dear Ms. Sheppard:

As we previously discussed, following up on our March 20, 2009 meeting, and representing the citizens of the State of New York, we have exhausted our remedies at the new Department of Justice (“DOJ”). At the close of the March 20, meeting, you requested, and we accepted, that we exhaust our remedies at the new DOJ and if nothing is done by the new DOJ concerning the unconscionable state of affairs in New York surrounding the commission of Federal crimes by State courts, Federal courts, and public officers, the Subcommittee and the Administrative Office of the United States Courts (“AO”) would either partner with DOJ to act or pick up from DOJ as the case may be; as the present state of affairs is clear (inaction by the DOJ), we respectfully request that you abide by your March 20, 2009 representations and “pick up from the DOJ” either singularly or in conjunction with the AO.

Furthermore, as I have previously written, startling NEW revelations have been made, not the least of which, are: (i) representation of INDIVIDUAL defendants by the Office of the Attorney General of the State of New York; (ii) knowledge of WITNESS TAMPERING and threats without the absolute requisite actions of a FEDERAL JUDGE; (iii) offers of COMPENSATION TO PLAINTIFF’S COUNSEL by the Office of the New York State Attorney General in return for settling the case out of court; (iv) miscellaneous instances of error by a FEDERAL JUDGE whether purposeful or not; (v) individual(s) JAILED for nothing more than the political whim of State Judges; (vi) children ripped from their mothers, with NO visitation, by nothing less than monied spouses paying their “insurance premiums” to court officers and other members of the judiciary whether directly, or indirectly through what are so called “legal fees” to their counsels; (vii) OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE to be revealed in the future testimony of Honorable Rory J. Bellantoni; and (viii) instances of ELECTION FRAUD.

Additionally, the list can go on and on, but most notably, an attorney has come forward with incontrovertible evidence of the 2005 murder perpetrated by a Port Chester, N.Y. policeman of the policeman’s girlfriend, a crime that was subsequently covered up as a suicide by and between the Port Chester Police Department, the sitting District Attorney of Westchester County, N.Y. and the incoming District Attorney-elect.

As you are aware, and from November 2008 to March 2009, we, in representation of the citizens of the State of New York, have submitted nine (9) affidavits with incontrovertible evidence of many outrageous and criminal acts by certain individuals within and about the State and Federal court systems in New York that have been substantially overlooked for no other reason than their favored position or political affiliation.

Parties that will attend this proposed meeting are:

Christine C. Anderson, Esq.
General Claims: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act
Bio: Former Staff Attorney at the New York State Supreme Court First Judicial Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee

Kevin McKeown
General Claims: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act
Bio: Aggrieved individual in the State of New York

Luisa C. Esposito
General Claims: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act
Bio: Sexual Assault and Battery Victim

P. Stephen Lamont
General Claims: Civil Racketeering (18:1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act)
Bio: CEO, Iviewit Technologies, Inc.

Hon. Rory J. Bellantoni
General Claims: Obstruction of Justice
Bio: County Court Judge, Westchester County, N.Y.

TBD.
General Claims: Election Fraud
Bio: Forthcoming

TBD
General Claims: Cover up of a 2005 murder of a citizen of the State of New York
Bio: Forthcoming

Lastly, Ms. Sheppard, considering these serious matters, the state of affairs in New York will never right itself absent Congressional intervention. Therefore, in a follow-up face-to-face meeting before the Subcommittee, select members of the Subcommittee(s) or its counsel, and the Administrative Office of the United States Courts where supplied with further evidence, it will become crystal clear for the need of such Federal intervention; it is respectfully requested that you abide by your previously stated representations at the March 20, 2009 meeting.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Best regards,

P. Stephen Lamont
Chief Executive Officer
Iviewit Technologies, Inc.
175 King Street
Armonk, N.Y. 10504
Tel: 914-217-0038
Email: pstephen.lamont@verizon.net; pstephen.lamont@att.blackberry.net
URL: www.linkedin.com/in/pstephenlamont; www.myspace.com/pstephenlamont; www.iviewit.tv "

The Above QUOTE is from the Link Below
http://blogs.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendId=114167543&blogId=525027421
Iviewit Technologies, Inc.,P. Stephen Lamont,
Former CEO Lamont, Eliot Bernstein,
More on the Iviewit Stolen Patent Case at www.Iviewit.TV and www.DeniedPatent.com
Crystal L. Cox Whistleblower

CEO Lamont Interfaces With President of Microsoft TV

"..August 05, 2009 "


"CEO Lamont Interfaces With President of Microsoft TV
Category: Web, HTML, Tech

Enrique, "

"It has been a long, long time and I hope all is well with you and yours. We have watched the Google/On2 technologies deal with interest, and, as a counter, I would like to introduce you and Microsoft to Iviewit Technologies, Inc. where we believe we hold the patent pending rights to the: (i) backbone, enabling technology for the encoding and transmission of video across all networks and viewable on all display devices; and (ii) image overlay systems, the effective inventors of digital zoom. At your leisure, please look at our website (sans all the legal jargon and car images inserted by our passionate founder) and let me know what you think.

As a last word, the patent filings are in need of some repair and continuance, but you can see where we fit in video by the attached slide. Look forward to hearing from you.

Best regards,

P. Stephen Lamont
Chief Executive Officer
Iviewit Technologies, Inc.
175 King Street
Armonk, N.Y. 10504
Tel: 914-217-0038
Email: pstephen.lamont@verizon.net ; pstephen.lamont@att.blackberry.net
URL: www.linkedin.com/in/pstephenlamont; www.myspace.com/pstephenlamont ; www.iviewit.tv "

Source of the Above Quote
http://blogs.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendId=114167543&blogId=504031809

******
Question, Does P. Stephen Lamont have the "Authority" to email Microsoft on behalf of Iviewit Technologies ? Who is the "We" P. Stephen Lamont is Referring to? Up until an Email P. Stephen Lamont send me yesterday I thought he was was working on behalf of Iviewit, and for the best interest of the shareholders, but Emails Correspondence I have been Privileged to over the last couple of days Suggest Different.

More information on the Iviewit Stolen Patent Case at Eliot Bernstein's website www.Iviewit.TV or my Blog on the Fascinating Story of the Iviewit Stolen Patent Case at www.DeniedPatent.com

Crystal L. Cox
Whistleblower

P. Stephen Lamont on Himself...

" P. Stephen Lamont's Blurbs

About me:
By way of introduction, I am P. Stephen Lamont, CEO of, as well as a significant shareholder in, Iviewit Holdings, Inc., a privately held Delaware corporation, and its subsidiaries, affiliates and related parties (collectively “Iviewit”) with more than a fifteen year track record as a multimedia technology and consumer electronics licensing executive and holder of a J.D. in Intellectual Property Law, an M.B.A in Finance, and a B.S. in Industrial Engineering, and I devote this page to apprise you of the denial of due process in the pattern of frauds, deceits, and misrepresentations that run so wide and so deep that it tears at the very fabric of what has become to be know as free commerce in this country, and, in the fact that it pertains to inventors rights, tears at the very fabric of the Constitution of the United States more fully described within the enclosed blogs and videos. "

Source of Quote Above
http://www.myspace.com/pstephenlamont


So if your a "Significant Shareholder" that means you can bully Bloggger, work with attorneys, submit court documents and do business as if your the Owner of a Company... WOW...

And can you say your the Company CEO if the Company says your not... ?? again WoW..

P. Stephen Lamont Demands that I, Crystal L. Cox - Industry Whistleblower - Remove Reference to His Name.

Email to Me from P. Stephen Lamont, the Former CEO of the Iviewit Technologies Inc.

"" Ms. Cox:

I have seen your website and the baseless material Mr. Bernstein has posted at http://www.deniedpatent.com/ .

Moreover, in seeing such, I have been counseled to request that you remove any reference to my name until the conclusion of your "investigation."

Furthermore, we expect that you will conduct an OBJECTIVE investigation, and in doing such, you will find that Mr. Bernstein's allegations are meritless, have no basis in fact, are inflammatory, defamatory, slanderous, and libelous.

Lastly, I request that you copy me on any and all communications with Mr. Bernstein as it relates to your "investigation;" please feel free to contact me as your "investigation" concludes that the aforementioned allegations are completely without merit.


Best regards,

P. Stephen Lamont
Chief Executive Officer
Iviewit Technologies, Inc.
175 King Street
Armonk, N.Y. 10504
Tel: 914-217-0038

Email: pstephen.lamont@verizon.net; pstephen.lamont@att.blackberry.net
URL: www.linkedin.com/in/pstephenlamont; www.myspace.com/pstephenlamont; http://www.iviewit.tv/ """

Mr. High Tech Guy has just seen my "Website", Blog I guess he Means. I have been writing on the Iviewit Stolen Patent Story for 2 Months, What Finally woke him up to My Blogs? And what made him feel that the Blogs were against him ?

The Email that Woke up P. Stephen Lamont was in No Way My Words and came from the Owner of the Iviewit Company, the Main Guy out there relentlessly Exposing the Iviewit Story everywhere for all to see .. Tirelessly for 8 years now.. and that would be Eliot Bernstein.

This Email went to many people from Eliot Bernstein and in case you missed that, P. Stephen Lamont added quite a bit of interaction with a guy named Brett and other Accusations and Slanderous Remarks about Eliot Bernstein in a Forward WHICH included the Previous Email .. you can Find at the Link Below..

http://www.whistleblowerhotline.net/2010/02/p-stephen-lamont-friend-or-foe-of.html

So Why Did P. Stephen Lamont Email me all this information if he did not expect to see it posted or me to write about it in any way? It is SHOULD be obvious that I am SHOUTING at the rooftops that I am a Whistleblower - an Investigative Reporter - YOU email me and I'm Telling... that Should Be Obvious by Now....

Next, How is my "material" baseless with thousands of documents of proof, links to the documents and that email was from someone in the Iviewit Company, that seems to be the Owner or One of the Owners, and is One of the Inventors... Baseless? How do you Figure that?

Mr. Lamont Requests that I copy him on Emails I send to Eliot Bernstein, hmmmmm.. On Whose Authority Can He Request That? And as it relates to my "investigation" - what is that about.. ??? is this because I now say on some of my sites that I am an investigative journalist. What I investigate is my business, what I write on is my business... he makes it sound like some sort of Official Investigation.. HEY .. I am just a Hick from the Sticks, Blogging about something that I find of interest... NO big DEAL... not my "material" not my story.

This STORY is 8 years old, can I help if if Many were not paying attention that now are? Not my Fault.. the "Material" is out there... with or with out me.. so why DOES P. Stephen Lamont want me to remove this material from my blog... and why does P. Stephen Lamont say that the Material is "baseless" when it comes from www.iViewit.TV and the Related blog.. and Mr. Lamont puts a link to that site in his emails telling me of HIS AUTHORITY to have me Remove information from my site.. Come on THIS information is at www.IVIEWIT.tv and you link to it in EVERY email you send... So it is Baseless Material... YET your Promoting it EVERYWHERE online that your name exists including your My Space Bio... ???? Hmmmm

Well here is My Response Email to Mr. Lamont...

My Response Email to P. Stephen Lamont is Posted Below


Subject on Mr. Lamont's Request to Industry Whistleblower Crystal L. Cox




""Re: MORE URGENT IVIEWIT MATTER RE P. Stephen Lamont Iviewit Frauds

Hello, I own DeniedPatent.com - No on has access to my
Industry Blog Network But Me.

You and Eliot sent emails to many people, I posted that email, NOT at Eliots request, permission or even his knowledge, I simple posted on my site I put his name as it was his words. He did not ask me too and did not insinuate in any way that I do so. Nor did he have any information
in advance of me making that post. I am sure he was as surprised as you seem to be.

I had a very busy day yesterday, however I do intent to post your email as well.

I am an Industry Whistleblower, you emailed me yesterday, my guess
is surely you would know who you are emailing, I am an online journalist
per say, So sending me something, WELL I have thus have a right to post it.

I have been writing on Behalf of the Real Estate Consumer for Some time,
due to a major 1031 Company going bankrupt, I ended up writing about
bankruptcy corruption that is when I came across the SGI bankruptcy, I wanted
to see how that related to everything I was at the time researching, I stumbled on
Iviewit.TV website and related blogs ... and information around the Beg. Of Dec.
I read pretty much every document on that page, and as you know there are around
a thousand of them... court documents, and more, including some that you wrote.

I think for myself, I emailed Eliot on the Story, as he seems to welcome that from his site.

My research is from that site and other deep search, I link to my source, or have
that source. Thus the information is in NO WAY Defamatory. It is not made up by me in any way.

Your name is on the Court Documents, they are out there, and my site simply links to them. Your "Counsel" can email me a Cease and Desist if they like or mail me one. I suggest you make sure to brush up on Blogs, Intellectual Property, Linking to a Source and some of the other issues you may need to know before your "Counsel" contacts me. As I tend to be Very Good at Internet Marketing and when I post a story even if it was already on the Internet for Years, it gets noticed, and well some don't like it - even though it is NOT my story, or my words for the most, just my blog..

So I do get the Occasional Cease and Desist and Do
Get this Blog, Blogger, Investigative Journalist, Modern Media Playing Field.

Now that email you sent on Eliot needing to take his blood pressure medicine.
and accusing him of theft... went to many people a few days ago,and was in no way private.

If you have something you think I should "Investigate"
Please Email it to me and I will consider it otherwise I will
simply investigate what I find, and post what I find.

Do you Own Iviewit ?

Are you Still involved in Representing the Iviewit Shareholders?

Are you the Person of Record that I should Talk to about
the Iviewit Stolen Patent Case?

Are you one of the Inventors of the Iviewit Stolen Patent?

From What I read on your Letters I posted, and the documents
I have read online YOU are a Former CEO, this in your words
unless those documents were tampered with. If you are a "Former"
CEO then I am unclear as to your "Authority" to request any
information from me on ANYTHING at all really, especially anything
to do with the Iviewit Company or Mr. Eliot Bernstein.

Your Email ends with your Title as

Chief Executive Officer -
Iviewit Technologies, Inc.

Yet I have read documents by you that say you are a
Former CEO, So are you Hired back to act on behalf
of the Iviewit Shareholders or the Iviewit Technologies, Inc. ?

Up until your Email on the "meds" Eliot Berstein needs, I had thought you were
one of the Good Guys in this fight to get justice for the Iviewit Shareholders and
the Iviewit Inventors. I have watched your videos and though very hard to make out,
I thought they were heartfelt and genuine.

Your email to me made me look deeper at Eliots Email which
I had previously dismissed, combined these emails made me question
whose side your on so that is my next writing project. That Simple.

Had you not Copied me on that Derogatory, Defamatory email on Eliot Bernstein,
his business, his "pocketing" of money, and his health issues I would not have ever questioned which side your on as from your videos and the documents I saw, I thought you were on board
on behalf of Iviewit and the Greater Good of All involved. And on the Side of Truth, Justice and Integrity.

Also in that email YOU sent to me, you talk about Plan B and what your doing next,
you involved me in that information. YOU emailed ME....

Thank You For This Email. I appreciate you time.I Hope you have a Clearer Understanding
of all this, and how I come to question whose side your really on.

I hope you have a Better Understanding of Who I am and that you Do Not again Try and Bluff me, but instead be a part of the Greater Good in Getting Justice to the Iviewit Inventors,
and the Iviewit Shareholders and that you do not engage in petty name calling, threats,
and the accusing of theft as well as telling us all this about Mr. Berstein,
" Lol, lol…get this man some blood pressure medicine, SOON. "

Peace and Love to You Mr. Lamont I wish you well in all you do...

Crystal L. Cox
Industry Whistleblower ""




********

The Information on www.DeniedPatent.com Came from www.iviewit.TV and the Related Blog - Stephen Lamont Puts www.Iviewit.TV in his Signature, so why does he want me to remove the information relating to him from my BLOGS when it is the Story, the CEO at the Time, the Court Documents, it is all part of the Iviewit Stolen Patent Case. In which I am not "Investigating" as Mr. Lamont keeps Spouting, I am Blogging and Linking to the Source, I did not make this stuff up or well.. it would be a Best Seller and Movie by now...


So the Question Remains - Whose Side is P. Stephen Lamont Really ON?
Crystal L. Cox

P. Stephen Lamont sent Me this Email on Secret Plans, Eliot Bernstein's Blood Pressure, Theft accusation and more...

So P. Stephen Lamonts puts the
www.Iviewit.TV in the signature
of his Email, Why?

To me it says that the Iviewit site is a source for more information on the Email Author, however the Iviewit Site says that P. Stephen Lamont is a ForMer CEO of the Iviewit Company, seemingly in P. Stephen Lamont's Own Words.

You will See in the Email below to Me and Many others from P. Stephen Lamont that is Acting on Behalf of the Iviewit Company, I have no Proof as to if he has authority to do so or not. I am simply a blogger and linking to my Source.

You will also See in the Email below to Me and Many others from P. Stephen Lamont - that
P. Stephen Lamont is claiming to still be the Chief Executive Officer of Iviewit Technologies, Inc., and that P. Stephen Lamont is accusing Eliot Bernstein of Theft, Why?

Read the Email Below, Mix that With all the information on www.DeniedPatent.com and on www.Iviewit.TV and Decide what to Believe is Fact for YOURSELF.



Here is the Email from P. Stephen Lamont sent to me and Many Other... Does this Sound Factual and Professional to You? There are other emails below about the Iviewit Shares and the Iviewit Company and it says that the Email is Proprietary, Yet this many I have NEVER met sent it to me... and I feel that the Shareholders of Sony, Intel, Iviewit, Warner Brothers and more have a right to know what is going on...

Says I am Prohibited from Sharing this Proprietary information if it was not intended for me. . yet P. Stephen Lamont sent it Directly TO me..

******

"Lol, lol…get this man some blood pressure medicine, SOON. When viewing the rational email lineage below between CEO Lamont and shareholder Brett Howard (scroll all the way down), how foolish does Bernstein, and those aligned with him, if anyone, how foolish does he look now?

BTW, it was Mr. Howard’s $50k investment that Bernstein, among others, pocketed between 2002 and the time of the Bernstein Tapes in 2004…who’s kidding whom?

Best regards,

P. Stephen Lamont
Chief Executive Officer
Iviewit Technologies, Inc.
175 King Street
Armonk, N.Y. 10504
Tel: 914-217-0038
Email: pstephen.lamont@verizon.net; pstephen.lamont@att.blackberry.net
URL: www.linkedin.com/in/pstephenlamont; www.myspace.com/pstephenlamont; http://www.iviewit.tv/

THIS MESSAGE AND ITS EMBEDDED AND/OR ATTACHED FILES INCORPORATED HEREIN BY REFERENCE CONTAIN INFORMATION THAT IS PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL,PRIVILEGED INFORMATION.

IF YOU ARE NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, YOU ARE PROHIBITED FROM READING, OPENING, PRINTING, COPYING, FORWARDING, OR SAVING THIS MAIL AND ITS EMBEDDED AND/OR ATTACHED FILES. PLEASE DELETE THE MESSAGE AND ITS EMBEDDED AND/OR ATTACHED FILES WITHOUT READING, OPENING, PRINTING, COPYING, FORWARDING, OR SAVING THEM, AND NOTIFY THE SENDER IMMEDIATELY AT 914-217-0038.

IF YOU ARE THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, YOU ARE PROHIBITED FROM FORWARDING THEM OR OTHERWISE DISCLOSING THESE CONTENTS TO OTHERS, WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE SENDER.

Stephen,

Thanks for the insight. I vote for plan “B”, if it’s a viable option.

Thanks again,
Brett


ANDERSON HOWARD
Keeping Your Business LIVE™
Brett Howard Vice President & COO
bretth@aandh.com
T 949.250.4555 ext. 333
F 949.250.1918
C 714.231.78181791
Reynolds Ave.Irvine, CA 92614-5711

From: P. Stephen Lamont [mailto:pstephen.lamont@verizon.net] Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2010 10:51 AMTo: Brett HowardSubject: RE: Iviewit Shareholder Vote: Response Required

Brett,

Nice to hear from you. I’ve been told that the US Supreme Court is interested in corruption cases, but their bread and butter cases are where there are conflicting rulings by Circuit Courts or issues of major constitutional importance (I e., Roe v. Wade, etc., not these issues), and, even then, they only take a very, very, very small percentage of cases filed. Waiting for the criminal side to act is totally out of anyone’s control, but the FBI and United States Attorneys.

It is my hope that Plan B comes to fruition (when I can divulge I immediately will), and I will wait for additional responses to come in, and let everyone know the results.

Looking at our Final Version 10 cap table as I have had to do recently, I value (just my gut feel) Iviewit at $2.5 billion today, and your 129 shares work out to roughly $2.5 million today, so it is an important decision to make. I will be back in touch.


Best regards,

P. Stephen Lamont
Chief Executive Officer
Iviewit Technologies, Inc.
175 King Street
Armonk, N.Y. 10504
Tel: 914-217-0038
Email: pstephen.lamont@verizon.net; pstephen.lamont@att.blackberry.net
URL: www.linkedin.com/in/pstephenlamont; www.myspace.com/pstephenlamont; http://www.iviewit.tv/

THIS MESSAGE AND ITS EMBEDDED AND/OR ATTACHED FILES INCORPORATED HEREIN BY REFERENCE CONTAIN INFORMATION THAT IS PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL,PRIVILEGED INFORMATION. IF YOU ARE NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, YOU ARE PROHIBITED FROM READING, OPENING, PRINTING, COPYING, FORWARDING, OR SAVING THIS MAIL AND ITS EMBEDDED AND/OR ATTACHED FILES. PLEASE DELETE THE MESSAGE AND ITS EMBEDDED AND/OR ATTACHED FILES WITHOUT READING, OPENING, PRINTING, COPYING, FORWARDING, OR SAVING THEM, AND NOTIFY THE SENDER IMMEDIATELY AT 914-217-0038. IF YOU ARE THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, YOU ARE PROHIBITED FROM FORWARDING THEM OR OTHERWISE DISCLOSING THESE CONTENTS TO OTHERS, WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE SENDER.



From: Brett Howard [mailto:Bretth@aandh.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2010 1:34 PMTo: pstephen.lamont@verizon.netSubject:
RE: Iviewit Shareholder Vote: Response Required

Stephen,

You’re closer to the heart of this thing than anyone else. What do you believe is the best course of action?

Best regards,
Brett


ANDERSON HOWARD
Keeping Your Business LIVE™
Brett Howard Vice President & COO
bretth@aandh.com
T 949.250.4555 ext. 333
F 949.250.1918
C 714.231.78181791 Reynolds Ave.
Irvine, CA 92614-5711

......

Iviewit Shareholder Vote: Response Required
Importance: High

The going forward options presently are:

1. Press onto the U.S. Supreme Court;
2. Await the coming of Plan B (currently operating in stealth mode);
3. Sit tight and wait for the criminal side to act (default option).

Discretion of CEO remains, but responses are due by Wednesday, February 17, 2010; no responses default to option 3.

Best regards,

P. Stephen Lamont
Chief Executive Officer
Iviewit Technologies, Inc.
175 King Street
Armonk, N.Y. 10504
Tel: 914-217-0038
Email: pstephen.lamont@verizon.net; pstephen.lamont@att.blackberry.net
URL: www.linkedin.com/in/pstephenlamont; www.myspace.com/pstephenlamont; http://www.iviewit.tv/ ""

Secret Options, School Yard Bullying and Slams, Speculated Company worth of a company you do not own.... Is this Slander against the Iviewit Company... What is Really Going On...

You have a Right To Know...

Why is a Secret Stealth Plan B Needed ?

The Truth is the TRUTH.

The Facts, the Court Documents, the Agreements with Warner Brothers and Sony, the Correspondence with Intel - Bruce Swell and all those involved in this Stolen Patent Case ... well their is lots of documents, evidence and proof and I have faith that some Honest Judge, Honest Attorney, and Honest Court Somewhere will do the right thing and that Stealth, Secrets... and whatever the Plan B is .. well that is not necessary.. Does make you curious what plan B is and if it is LEGAL?

Crystal L. Cox
Truth Seeker
Industry Whistleblower
Crystal Cox