Stephen Lamont has SOLD Shares of Iviewit Technologies? How in the World Did Stephen Lamont Do that?

Stephen Lamont has sent out emails on Iviewit.. Stephen Lamont said this..

"It has come to my attention that there is a question about how Kevin McKeown became an Iviewit Shareholder. The answer is simple: I sold him one (1) share of my holdings on May 11, 2010 for cash and a note, as is my right. "

How Can this Be? When no Iviewit Shares are actually Legally Owned by anyone and Stephen Lamont knows that he has no legal right to act on behalf of Iviewit, and Stephen Lamont knows that actual shares have not been issued right??? as there was no board.. or something like that.. I mean he admits on the www.Iviewit.TV homepage that he was advised that he was NOT to act on behalf of Iview.. did Stephen Lamont have "holdings" to SELL .. is this Legal.. ??

It is My Understanding that.. Stephan Lamont, when hired as "ACTING" CEO, which is his self proclaimed original title, it is my understanding that Stephen Lamont wrote an employment agreement for himself, issuing stock for himself, which Eliot Bernstein agreed too as the company board has disbanded without any succession for shareholders or any formal notice, or reporting of mass fraud they had become aware of and that Eliot Bernstein was stuck holding the ball, per say as the rest of the team nowhere to be found.

So at this point Eliot Bernstein hired P. Stephen Lamont, whose resume questions Eliot Bernstein submitted to authorities as inconsistent but on good faith.

It came to pass, that Mitch Welsch in trying to help out the Iviewit shareholders and Eliot Bernstein, brought his friend Andrew Barroway, Esq. in supposed efforts to save Iviewit.

As you will remember, those around at time, Barroway signed a Letter of Understanding on his lawfirms letterhead to invest millions in Iviewit and represent Iviewit against in all litigations at the time, the document is on the homepage @ http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/2003%2007%2016%20Signed%20Letter%20of%20Understaning%20Iviewit%20&%20SB.pdf .

Ok, so then Barroway at the last minute.. the VERY last minute decides they wanted to talk settlement with Proskauer Rose @ http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/2003%2007%2028%20Proskauer%20Draft%20Settlement.pdf , including letting Proskauer Rose off if the patents were screwed up???

The settlement document had to be reviewed by lawyers by the parties before signing and Eliot Bernstein demanded at the last minute, counsel for Iviewit, Stephen Lamont and Eliot (personally and professionally) as they wanted me to sign as CEO, Lamont would have to resign as ACTING CEO and personally, so four lawyers were required for Eliot Bernstein and Stephen Lamont but Stephen Lamont opted out of getting counsel.

Marc Garber, Mitch Welsch's friend was brought on as personal counsel and he stated, along with Eliot's corp counsel that the docs could not be signed as presented, as neither Stephen Lamont nor Eliot Bernstein were legally in charge and had not been elected by a succession Board and the corps were already learned to be a mishmash of frauds so that the corps would all have to be updated with states, a new board somehow put in and a continuation plan or new company set up for a small fee of 30k, at which point Eliot Bernstein was broke and did not have the money to do this..

Also, it was claimed that to sign a release of liabilities of Proskauer Rose for patent problems would leave Iviewit further liable to shareholders which if Iviewit lost everything from the foolish settlement we could be liable to shareholders.

Since no one could legally sign the document without first reorganizing the companies, the settlement fell off.

Next, in a brazen move, after signing the LOU, Barroway was ready to go to trial along with our prior attorney in Proskauer Rose instigated billing lawsuit (on bogus companies with stolen patents) and the trial was like the next day or so and on the day of the trial, Selz called and said that the trial was cancelled without notice by Judge Labarga , Jorge Labarga at the rehearing scheduling, was presented with a withdrawal of counsel by Selz who claimed he was dropping as Barroway was signed in LOU to carry forward and Barroway had suggested his boot. Labarga granted.

Then Barroway, in a surprise move, almost as if he was working for the other side, presented Labarga with a withdrawal of counsel letter stating Selz would handle and Labarga granted and further left Iviewit with no counsel and 45 days to retain new counsel.

Barroway failed on all contract terms, never paid anything more than 1,000 salary even though they were supposed to have paid instantly a lot of money.

Iviewit failed to get counsel in 45 days and Labarga, despite having evidence that Proskauer Rose partners had perjured themselves in depo and more, ruled a default judgment in their favor.

Now, when Stephen Lamont was advised by counsel that he nor Eliot Bernstein could act in ANY official capacity for the company until the corps were all sorted and filed properly and new management elected etc., Eliot Bernstein went with the title Founder and Inventor and Stephen Lamont went with FORMER ACTING CEO.

In P. Stephen Lamont's own words from the iviewit homepage,

"By way of introduction, I am P. Stephen Lamont, former Acting CEO of Iviewit (counsel advised all Iviewit executives to resign their posts and work along side Iviewit rather than within Iviewit, as the former Board of Directors, Counsel and Accountants, disbanded without requisite notice to Shareholders in violation of law, thereby leaving massive liability and exposure) and a significant shareholder in Iviewit.)"

So Lamont was advised by counsel that all the documents, including his employment agreement etc. that were signed by Eliot Bernstein in an official capacity that Eliot did not really have and all his stock incentives etc. were not really due to this and would have to redone when the companies were repaired legally in the end, Lamont did not care and Eliot Bernstein promised that if he were to turn out in the end to be a good guy v. a plant (remember he claims first that Microsoft planted him and then later changes to AOL planted him through Ted Leonsis' niece or something to that effect) Eliot would honor his deal with him on the New Company or when the old were litigated and fixed and sorted through to determine the fraudulent companies etc. If he were dirty, of course he would lose everything.

So is Stephen Lamont working on the Right Side of the Law and the Right Side of the Moral Compass on this one.. ???

So Lamont resigned his ACTING CEO post, became FORMER and now, again with no board or management approval, having been fired by Eliot Bernstein.. Iviewit Founder and One of the Iviewit Inventors... and told to go away, Lamont changes his title now to CEO of yet another Iviewit that does not exist in New York and at an address not registered to any Iviewit company, perhaps these are the shares he sold to McKeown...

And what about the Spreadsheet Lamont attached to all this..

it is my understanding that it is his concoction and again Bernstein and Lamont were advised by counsel that any changes to what originally transpired with original shareholders was possibly fraudulent and certainly not valid until the corps could be brought up to compliance, etc. So all Lamont's self written stock agreements he knows are not legal at this point, yet he just ignores the advice he gets from counsel. .. WHY?

As a fired consultant to Eliot Bernstein and having no official title at Iviewit, Lamont instead makes it all up with a company in NY with a similar or identical name to Eliot's companies where he is now Iviewit CEO???...

What?

Stephen Lamont Says..

"" Interestingly enough, I received a call this morning from a third party aggrieved plaintiff asking to buy in! Without getting into net worth requirement details, I declined because as I have said before, according to Cap Table Version 10 - Final (attached), the capital of Iviewit Holdings, Inc. is CLOSED. ""

hmmmm, this is an interesting statement, Lamont is considering investors in his stock and where he has not been issued ANY shares in ANY iviewit companies because there were no shares to issue or way to issue them to him and so are they the shares of his fraudulent Iviewit in NY he has on his emails that he is CEO of, not even acting or former now.

Did Stephen Lamont get into the net worth requirements of McKeown whom it seems strange would be buying in when he knows of all these issues as Eliot Bernstein sent him the information when he brought Eliot Bernstein into the Anderson and related cases, under his covert name Frank Brady.

Sounding surreal, bear with me here and where it has been said that Brady, a former DDC employee, friend of Scheindlin's clerk, friend of Anderson, etc. is some form of Federal Agent and has so imparted that info to those he corralled to the Anderson party.

So, it would seem a little bit strange that Frank/Kevin would be buying shares of what he knows are fraudulent companies and where he knows Lamont is incapable.

Why is Lamont and Brady going to Supreme Court? What is their objective there anywy?

Why are they trying to change the case title without seeking leave to amend, why is this so important?

Now as for Mitch Welsch, it was last heard from attorney Marc Garber is that Barroway issued a basic threat upon Welsch that whatever happened to the House of Barroway would come back on the House of Welsch a thousand fold or words to that effect, a basic death threat to Mitch and his family. This is my understanding anyway..

It is said that Isa Welsch, Mitch's wife was longtime friends of Barroway and so this seemed serious, many fear their life over the Iviewit Stolen Patent to this day as the Wall of Corruption ... well it is quite intimidating to most..

As for Brett and Barry, its seems they appeared misinformed by Stephen Lamont as to what they were joining as Plaintiffs in a case at the Supreme Court with Lamont, that Eliot Bernstein will use as more Prima Facie evidence of his continued fraudulent acts for criminal investigators and I do not believe they will joining Mr. Lamont on his way fraudulently to the Supreme Court as CEO of an unknown iviewit and acting on shareholders behalf.

It is interesting to note that if Lamont who in the Original Fed Complaint, he wholly wrote, no editing from Bernstein other than to make him a Plaintiff as an Individual and as Lamont had it, on behalf of Iviewit shareholders. Eliot Bernstein questioned Lamont why he filed not as an Individual and he claimed he feared liabilities, I wonder if he disclosed this to everyone he is asking to sign on personally to his fraudulent suit documents and scheme???

Eliot Bernstein later found out that Lamont was wrong and that they could not sue on behalf of others, as we were not lawyers, Lamont having graduated Columbia Law claimed prior that this was OK but unless you are an attorney this claim is false.

Especially since they did not seek approval of those Lamont stated we were representing, the shareholders and when Eliot Bernstein learned of his statements to be false, he petitioned the Judge Scheindlin and US 2nd Cir to remove him as a Plaintiff on Behalf of and that he was mislead to think that it was OK by a law graduate.

Eliot Bernstein notified the court that upon learning of this false representation he notified Lamont and he would not seek leave to amend to change it, as he has no basis in the lawsuit without it.

Isn't it strange how Lamont now is trying to garner shareholders to look like he is representing them all along but none of these people ever approved the original complaint allowing him to represent them, now that his patents are well below his ankles and I have reported this to criminal authorities and the NY Bar, for his impostering a lawyer.

Stephen Lamont Says

"Lastly, contrary to one individuals opinion (do I even need to mention his name?), the above referenced filing is merely a Petition not a new lawsuit, where the relief prayed for is a review of lower court's findings where all Iviewit shareholders were parties; this Petition puts no one individual at monetary risk, much like the District Court suit and the 2nd Circuit appeal. "

All Iviewit shareholders were not really parties to the Original Complaint and most never even knew Lamont was representing on their behalf as he never sought their approval, again when Eliot Bernstein told him they should do that he claimed it was not necessary, that we had the right to act on their behalf, again a false statement.

Lamont also makes legal conclusions here about risk and liabilities to the parties that join as Plaintiffs on his newly stylized complaint with their names in Broadway Lights on the Heading of his "petition".

Is Stephen Lamont a lawyer, no, he never passed the bar???

Does Lamont have the power to tell people they have no risk or liabilities and why was he afraid to put his name individually on the original filing? Also, has Lamont sought leave to amend the Original Complaint to enable his changing the Case Title??? WHY???

Stephen Lamont has NO Authority What So Ever to Act on Behalf of Iviewit in ANY way.. and Stephen Lamont knows this .. so why is he throwing up yet another bogus smoke screen...

If you are an Iviewit Investor.. Seek Independent Legal Advise... Find out the Facts and your Risk and Liability BEFORE you sign anything...

P. Stephen Lamont Warning - Iviewit SC Filing: Shareholder Kevin McKeown "Opts-In" - Iviewit Technologies

It seems that P. Stephen Lamont is still scheming to derail the iViewit Technologies Inventors and Shareholders. Remember I wrote about P. Stephen Lamont, I posted information sent in to me, Stephen Lamont told Me, Investigative Blogger Crystal L. Cox to get My affairs in order - which to me is a death threat. Them P. Stephen Lamont joined a hate group to launch an online attack on me and more threats of physical violence.

I posted P. Stephen Lamonts emails to me and the proof of who he was talking to in Foley and Lardner and other related parties, I fully believe through who Stephen Lamont sent those posts to that someone in Foley and Lardner, Proskauer Rose and other insiders involved in stealing the Iviewit patent, I believe Stephen Lamont is in bad with the bad guys on this one..

so Every month or so, Stephen Lamont - who has no rights in the iviewit company, well Stephen Lamont keeps surfacing with some bogus claim, attack, or document to try and stall the inevitable to protect the attorneys that I believe he is in the pocket of.. just my own belief from my statcounter, his emails to me and all that has transpired.. no other reason makes sense...

I personally believe that Stephen Lamont is paid to keep the Iviewit shareholders confused and shook up so that the iviewit justice will be put further off... this smoke screen seems to be confincing some iViewit shareholders even though Stephen Lamont does not have the Right to Act on behalf of Iviewit Technologies in any way.

I was writing, blogging on the iViewit Technologies in a way that would tell the truth of what really happened, this Truth would then expose that the iviewit shareholders really got screwed... so why in the world would one of these shareholders attack me and tell me to get my affairs in order... unless their was dirty dealings - double talk and corruption.. behind the scenes..

Now Stephen Lamont is trying to Scheme to put more blocks in True Justice... for the Iviewit Shareholders...

"P. Stephen Lamont, Barry Becker, Brett Howard, and Kevin McKeown v. Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee, et al."

Iviewit SC Filing: Shareholder Kevin McKeown "Opts-In"

Iviewit Shareholders: Look Deep into what you are being spoon fed by Stephen Lamont - I believe he is in bed with the very enemy that stole the Iviewit Patent and keeps you from your money and justice in the first place... trust your instincts folks.. and get proof - facts.. I am NOT asking you to Believe me.. I am Saying that Knowledge is Power and you need to make sure you see proof of Stephen Lamonts rants, requests, suggestions.. talk of his power or rights.. because you may play the fool and instead of getting your money and justice .. you may just be up for criminal charges along with P. Stephen Lamont.. GET your FACTS folks..

Plaintiffs in Lamont’s scheme, if you go along with him.. seek lots of legal advice first.. and make sure that you are informed of the liabilities of putting YOUR names as direct plaintiffs in a lawsuit. You may be SHOCKED at the risk your taking by believing the lies that Stephen Lamont is feeding you.. find your facts independently..

One question I have in all this is .. who issued Kevin McKeown shares in Iviewit since no shares have been legally issued since the board disbanded without notifying shareholders etc. or electing lamont with executive authorities?

Read Folks, Study all the documents at www.Iviewit.Tv and make sure that you know what you are doing before you jump on Stephen Lamont's Bandwagon.. against True iViewit Justice.

It is my understanding that Eliot Bernstein, Owner and One of the Iviewit Inventors .. has warned all that join Lamont’s scheme and put yourself on as a Plaintiff will cause you to be center stage against 4000 defendants or more and the liabilities to you and your family would be incredibly risky..

Why does Lamont need anyone to make his argument??? The Iviewit shareholders surely can see the truth to all of this right?

Please consult a lawyer and Request that Stephen Lamont have a lawyer tell you of ALL the liabilities and risk that may result to you and your families.

Eliot Bernstein of Iviewit Technologies has reported P. Stephen Lamont for criminal activities and is awaiting the investigatory reports.

Enter into binding legal agreements with P. Stephen Lamont at your risk.

More on the Iviewit Stolen Patent at
www.Iviewit.TV and
www.DeniedPatent.com

What is Stephen Lamont's Plan B - is it Legal - Does Stephen Lamont have this Authority? Why is a Supposed Ex-CEO causing such a Conflict?

Why is P. Stephen Lamont still acting as if he is CEO of Iviewit, is HE? Has he proved this to you with the Correct, Proper, Legal Documentation?

It seems to me that Stephen Lamont is Rogue on all this and just trying to stir things up, do you want to take a chance of doing something Illegal?

Yes their is Corruption in the Courts, yes their is Illegal Behavoir - Stolen Patents - Corrupt Patent Attorneys - Tech Companies who so Far are Above the Law - However, you still must wait for the Slow moving wheels of the United States Justice System and NOT be tempted into Illegal behavior. the Truth will Surface. And it will do so in a Legal, Ethical Way and those in the US Court system who are NOT corrupt will ONE day abide by the great laws of the United States and do the Right thing. Until then, do not become one of those acting illegally or outside of the laws.... get your Proof... your documentation... before you Trust the Latest Lamont Email Circulating... Funny many sources now seem to be sending me this email...

Why is there only One Seeming Outsider in the Iviewit Technoligies Drama? The Backbiting needs to Stop and the Proof needs to simply be laid out to the courts... and this Plan B... well.. it sounds pretty mysterious and Rogue to Me... be Careful Folks..

Again .. I am in NO WAY asking you to believe me, I am asking for you to do your homework and get your facts to you keep out of harms way...

Here is Todays Email Drama:

"" Subject: Iviewit Shareholder Vote Results
Importance: High

Attached, and not withstanding the vote to select Option 3 below (exclusively by default), at CEO discretion I will direct towards Option 2 if and when and it might come to fruition (Plan B forthcoming).

However, for those of you who wish to operate exclusively through Eliot Bernstein’s psychologically unstable personality and “game plan,” please send me an “opt out” message by Wednesday, March 3, 2010.

By “opting out,” the caveat is if and when Plan B comes to fruition, and if any settlement or damage awards are accrued through Plan B, those “opting out” will be left to their own recourse to recover.

Questions?

Best regards,

P. Stephen Lamont
Chief Executive Officer
Iviewit Technologies, Inc.
175 King Street
Armonk, N.Y. 10504
Tel: 914-217-0038
Email: pstephen.lamont@verizon.net; pstephen.lamont@att.blackberry.net
URL: www.linkedin.com/in/pstephenlamont; www.myspace.com/pstephenlamont; http://www.iviewit.tv/

......

The going forward options presently are:

1. Press onto the U.S. Supreme Court;
2. Await the coming of Plan B (currently operating in stealth mode);
3. Sit tight and wait for the criminal side to act (default option).

Discretion of CEO remains, but responses are due by Wednesday, February 17, 2010; no responses default to option 3.

Best regards,

P. Stephen Lamont
Chief Executive Officer
Iviewit Technologies, Inc.
175 King Street
Armonk, N.Y. 10504
Tel: 914-217-0038
Email: pstephen.lamont@verizon.net; pstephen.lamont@att.blackberry.net
URL: www.linkedin.com/in/pstephenlamont; www.myspace.com/pstephenlamont; http://www.iviewit.tv/ ""

Do your Own Homework.. do not Rely on My Opinion
as ANY Investment or LEGAL Advice...
Think for Your Self....

I am posting this here for your information, and in no way to retaliate for Stephen Lamont Joining a Hate Group against me or Threatening My Life. I feel you have a right to this information and Transparency. Your Millions upon Million of Shareholder Money is at Stake.

I have been blogging on the iViewit Stolen Patent for over two months now, it is important to me. I shall continue to do so regardless of the Threats P. Stephen Lamont has made on my Life or the Evidence of the Hate Group he joined or started Defaming my Real Estate Company and ME personally.

One more Note here, from My Perspective and reading the documents that Eliot Bernstein has legally presented to the US Judicial System, it appears that Eliot Bernstein's game plan is Based in Law, in Fact, in True and Correct Evidence and is Very Stable. Read as many documents as you can and Make up your Own Mind for Yourself.

Eliots "plan" and documents is all out in the open and with no secret code names Plan B or other mysterious, possibly illegal methods to attempt to pursue more fraud on the US Courts. Eliot Bernstein is the Founder of the iViewit Company and Well, are you going to Stand with the Owner or someone he fired long ago... ??? Your Decision...


Crystal L. Cox
Investigative Blogger.....
crystal cox blogs

Eliot Bernstein - Iviewit Technologies Reporting Stephen Lamont to the New York Attorney General

To Steven Michael Cohen
Counselor and Chief of Staff
New York Attorney General

Dated: June 18th, 2009

Re: First Department Obstruction of Justice

Letter to Steven M. Cohen, NYAG
From Eliot I. Bernstein Founder and Inventor
I~view~it Technologies, INC
I~view~it Holdings,Inc

This Letter is About Obstruction of Justice, Conflicts of Interest and More.. This Letter to the NYAG also includes information on Eliot Bernstein, Founder and One of the Inventors of the Iviewit Technologies Inc. - Complaining to the NYAG that Stephen Lamont has been requested to cease making representations of behalf of Iviewit and its Share Holders... Read FULL Document Below - and Decide the Truth for Yourself.

Click Here for Document

posted here by
Crystal L. Cox

Investigative Blogger

Industry Whistleblower

On What or Whose Authority is P. Stephen Lamont Acting On?

Why is Stephen Lamont Threatening to End the Affairs of Investigative Blogger Crystal L. Cox? Why is Stephen Lamont Demanding that I Copy him on my emails to anyone regarding the Iviewit Company?

Why in the World would Stephen Lamont Threat my Life, and my "Affairs", just because I posted a document and words THAT were NOT mine... ???

Does Stephen Lamont have the Legal Authority
to Speak on behalf of the Iviewit Company?

Can P. Stephen Lamont Legally File Federal Documents to QUASH Eliot Bernstein's Motion .. when Mr. Lamont was Fired, Long .. Long ago ?

Iviewit, Eliot Bernstein Says:

" Lamont was not approved by any board, as the board disbanded illegally and without noticing the shareholders and so I hired lamont and offered him stock in the company. Later we learned from Garber and other law firms that we could not act on behalf of Iviewit in official capacity until the books and corporate records were fixed, approximately 50k and that is why lamont claims he was advised by counsel to work outside the company and not as an officer, as he legally was never an officer."

More on Iviewit.. and Lamont
http://www.deniedpatent.com/2010/02/p-stephen-lamont-friend-or-foe-of.html

Posted by
Investigative Blogger
Crystal L. Cox
Industry Whistleblower

This is not My Story .. it is However, the Greatest Patent Story every Told, and well I find it intriguing So I post about it.. I Found the Information on www.Iviewit.TV where the story has been running for 8 Years.

I link to that site in Which Stephen Lamont also promotes.

SO why threaten me for posting information from that site and directly from the REAL owner .. and one of the Inventors of the Iviewit Patent.. Why Terrorize me for simply reading a Website and posting pieces of it on my site and linking to the site...??

Why has, P. Stephen Lamont, an Alleged Former CEO of Iviewit Technologies Inc. Threatened me for posting information that is not mine.

And it is Reported to ME that Stephen Lamont has Joined and or Created a Hate Group, and is actively recruiting others to join him in this group that is threatening to Incarcerate me, Burn Me at the Stake, Ruin Me, and Telling Lie upon Lie about me.. and my Business.. all because I Posted Excerpts from the Iviewit Website.

I just don't Understand.
I have no Bad intentions.

I am simply writing about an 8 Year Old Stolen Patent Story
that is and has been already on the Web for 8 years....

Not my Story...
I am Just a Modern Day
Investigate Journalist.. which means
I Read..
I Post...
that Simple..

Say you Owned a Company and an Investigative Blogger Was Researching and Writing on Your Comany...

Would you Want the Investigative Blogger to get Information from News Sources, Your Website and From you the Owner of the Company... or would you want that Investigative Blogger to get information from Someone you fired Long, Long ago?

Think About it.. I prefer the Source...

Crystal L. Cox
Investigative Blogger

P. Stephen Lamont - Now Suspected to be Hiding IP on AOL

Why.. ? the Truth is the TRUTH .. fact is fact...

Why not search and post with Honest, Open, Integrity?

anyway AOL Serve Obsessed Today with this POST
http://www.deniedpatent.com/2010/02/stephen-lamont-searching-crystal-l-cox.html

Obey the Law
Tell the Truth
Stand Up for Victims
Do the Right Thing...
That Simple

Crystal L. Cox
Investigative Blogger

Was P. Stephen Lamont Really The CEO of the Iviewit Technologies Company

In the Quest to see if P. Stephen Lamont is working for or against the Iviewit Shareholders and the Iviewit Inventors. I have to ask and research such questions.

Also did Stephen Lamont Really go to Columbia, Does P. Stephen Lamont have a Law Degree? Has Stephen Lamont Being deliberate sabatoging the Iviewit Inventors, Company and Shareholders from the Begining... ???

Who in the Trillion Dollar Patent Heist is Stephen Lamont actually working for, with or against? Where is the FBI, the SEC, the FTC, and the Department of Justice. This is Trillions of Dollars and Shareholders Stand to Lose Billions... where is the United States Justice System??

Questions SOON to be answered.. if you have any VALID information on this, please email Crystal L. Cox - Investigative Blogger at Crystal@CrystalCox.com


More on the Iviewit Stolen Patent Case at

www.DeniedPatent.com

www.Iviewit.TV and http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/
Iviewit Stolen Patent Case
Where is Mary Schapiro

Greenberg Traurig Possible Connection.. and Interested in ...

For me, just in my Opinion, based on My Personal Experience.. I think Greenberg Traurig just threw their name in the hat as Connected to Stephen Lamont.. not sure .. just a speculation..

You will See the Stat Added Here.. at the Bottom of the Page..

posted by
Investigative Blogger
Crystal L. Cox

Stephen Lamont Searching ( "Crystal L. Cox" Lamont)

Did Stephen Lamont Really Just Discover that I was Blogging on Iviewit?

If So how involved is he really? I mean if he does not know what is going on in the Blogsphere and claims to be an Intellectual Property Guru and Tech Savvy.. well then who is he to Quash any MOTION by the REAL players in the Iviewit Stolen Patent Case who Really are on the Right side of the Law, the Right Side of the Moral Compass.

Why is Rye, New York - Assumed to Be P. Stephen Lamont Searching for "Crystal L. Cox" Lamont and what did he find ?

Crystal L. Cox
Investigative Blogger
if you have any Information on
anything I am Writing on .. please email me at
Crystal@CrystalCox.com
crystal cox blogger

Is Stephen Lamont, Former Alleged CEO, of Iviewit Conspiring with Foley and Lardner, the USPTO and other Players in the Iviewit Stolen Patent Case ???

It is Simply To Hard for Me to Wrap my Brain around the Actions of Stephen Lamont.

I Could not Figure out what possible Motive Stephen Lamont could have to Attempt to Discredit My Blog Postings and to Discredit Eliot Bernstein, when the Information on the Web from those two sources would only benefit P. Stephen Lamont up until he Threatened Me.

I just could not understand why Stephen Lamont would DEMAND that I remove Posts with his name, when those Posts were information from the www.Iviewit.TV Website that he links to in his every email, seemingly. and in which he seems to promote on the Internet with his my Space page and other online outlets of promotion.

So Why in the World would Stephen Lamont Threaten Me and Tell me to get My Affairs in order while I still can.. ?? and demand that I change my Blogs.. ?? when the Facts of the Story came from www.Iviewit.TV in which he promotes ?

It Simply Did not Make Sense to me.

In trying to figure out Why P. Stephen Lamont is Aggressively Demanding and Threatening me Now after 2 months of Blogging about the Iviewit Stolen Patent, and after the information has seemingly been on the Internet for over 8 years... I just had to Look Deeper...

I found myself needing to know more, and asking myself who is Stephen Lamont working with, why NOW?, what changed?

Did someone contact him and tell him to play big shot CEO and try and scare me with Demanding and Threatening Emails?

Did Stephen Lamont get orders from the USPTO - Foley and Lardner or some other Play in the Iviewit Stolen Patent Case?

P. Stephen Lamont is obviously a very smart man and surely saw me covering this story for around 2 months so far. Right ?

A guy who claims he wants to take over video.. blah .. blah .. blah.. online and the world this and that.. Surely he saw my Blogs, surely he looked into who and what I am about.. and Surely Stephen Lamont did not all of the Sudden wake up to my Righteous Stance on the Behalf of the Iviewit Shareholders, and the Iviewit Inventors ... On February 4th 2010, The day he was in Such a Stir about the email that Eliot Bernstein Sent out.

So Why did Stephen Lamont launch Demands and Threats on Crystal L. Cox, Investigative Blogger - when I was and have been for two months... out to Defend HIM, the company he was supposedly CEO of, and him getting his rightful compensation for the Iviewit Shares in which he deserves, Along with the Inventors and other Shareholders of the Iviewit Technologies Inc. ????

It seems to me that Stephen Lamont is running a Bluff at me, possibly for Someone Else. It Seems to Me that P. Stephen Lamont wants this "Hillbilly Blogger" to believe he has powers that he does not have in a Company which he is no longer a part of other then being a Shareholder as many other Shareholders....

Kind of makes you wonder who P. Stephen Lamont is Really Working for... could it be one of the Billionaire Tech Companies - Billionaire Law Firms or ?

I mean if the Tech companies can afford Millions on Top of Millions - in Anti-Trust Violation fines every year, often every Quarter and the Law Firms such as Proskauer Rose can pay 1.5 million as a minimum a month in rent in once location and they are Global..

These Companies involved in this Trillion Dollar Stolen patent.. they have some serious money.. why not use some of it to try and Run a Bluff on some Woman.. by sending in someone with a big Fancy CEO Title of the Company your Talking about to discredit the very people you have been defending for 2 months so far.. Why not Send in someone I may think is the CEO - or somehow I may think is in Charge of the Iviewit Company?

Surely this will Shut me UP.. Right?

and If that don't Work well Stephen Lamont
will just Threat to End my Affairs...

So Again Why NOW.. ???

this information on my Investigative Blogs
is Public Knowledge, it is in the Courts, in the News,
and all over the www.Iviewit.TV website.. so why now?
Why Me?

Maybe, Possibly, Just speculating here .. maybe the Super Power Elite told P. Stephen Lamont that the Iviewit Inventors would NEVER get their rights and the SHAREHOLDERS will never get paid, however maybe he could get something out of the deal.. just speculating here..

Maybe .. just maybe someone offered P. Stephen Lamont Money to work on the other side and make it look like he was working for the best interest of the Iviewit Shareholders and the REAL Iviewit Inventors.

But anyone with a brain can see that currently Eliot Bernstein and P. Stephen Lamont are not quite on the same page, so why would I think that P. Stephen Lamont could speak for Eliot Bernstein or the Iviewit Technologies Company.

If P. Stephen Lamont is disputing the information I posted, and that in which contains his name then why does every email to every person he emails and his resume, and his My Space Page contain the www.Iviewit.TV website ... as if it is his site, he is proud of it and Well ... Gee.. Hmmm... I got the information from that site and linked to the source...

So What is Really Going on with P. Stephen Lamont? Who is P. Stephen Lamont Talking to and on Whose Authority his he Demanding anything of me?

Well I can Tell you that Right After I posted this post.

http://www.industrywhistleblower.com/
2010/02/p-stephen-lamont-friend-or-foe-of_05.html

A Story of Intrigue and Suspense Unfolded Before my Eyes.. and Not Just the Threats and Demands from P. Stephen Lamont, but also of Who he Told, where they were and What Connections and Fingerprints he left along the way..

Well .. My Stat Counter Told me a Story .. that I feel I must Share..

I feel from My Own Personal Experience in Analyzing my Stats over the Years, and in my Opinion that once P. Stephen Lamont Seen the Above Post... he then Contacted the USPTO, Foley and Lardner, Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe, Duval & Stachenfeld, Steven C. Becker and
"Crystal L. Cox" Lamont
Well Click Here and Read the Story...

posted by Investigative Blogger
Crystal L. Cox
Lamont Iviewit
Tags: Connecting the Dots, Former CEO Lamont, Lamont Connections, P. Stephen Lamont, Stephen Lamont,Foley and Lardner, David Kappos USPTO, Duval and Stachenfeld, Orrick Herrington and Sutcliffe, Steven C. Becker,

Why Would Former iViewit CEO - P. Stephen Lamont ATTEMPT to Quash Motion by Eliot Bernstein?

Investigative Blogger Crystal L. Cox
Questions the Intentions, Integrity,
Morals and Connections of P. Stephen Lamont.

Why - 8 Years into the Iviewit Battle for the Rights of the Shareholders and Inventors would a Former CEO of Iviewit Technologies be filing Court Documents to Quash Eliot Bernstein's Motion?

P. Stephen Lamont being a Shareholder would Seem to benefit from the Iviewit Technologies Inc. Getting their Rights and the Inventors Getting Rights to their Patents...

The Question then is, Did P. Stephen Lamont Give up on Standing on the Right side of the Moral Compass and On standing on the Right side of the Law and on the side of the Rights of the Inventors and the Shareholders?

And with this did P. Stephen Lamont join with those who stole the patent in some attempt to get anything out of this "Iviewit Thing"? Who is Stephen Lamont Talking to and Why?

There are only 2 sides of the Iviewit Stolen Patent Case The One Side that is Lawful, Legal, Ethical and Moral and the OTHER Side which is Unlawful, Illegal, Immorral and UnEthical. Today I am Seriously Perplexed as to which Side Stephen Lamont is Standing on.
Which One of the Players in this Trillion Dollar Heist is P. Stephen Lamont Talking To?

Who is P. Stephen Lamont FORMOR Iviewit CEO really working for or with now? It Makes No Sense Do me. Stephen Lamont is now trying to STOP Eliot Bernstein in the Courts, Why?

Click Here to Read Document

Also One has to Again Ask Why Now?

Suddenly Stephen Lamont comes, seemingly out of
no where and joins on the opposite team of Eliot Bernstein.

P. Stephen Lamont Seems to stand on the Opposite side of the Moral Compass and is going to notify authorities of Eliot Bernstein's alleged acts, Why Now? What Acts, what is Going On?

If this Stuff is TRUE why would P. Stephen Lamont wait 8 years to tell the Authorities. I mean the mysterious "Authorities" in all this, well all they have to do is read all the proof and you can see that The Illegal Behavior is Obvious and Seriously Piling Up... and has been for at least 8 Years and the "Authorities" have done NOTHING to enforce the Laws of the United State of America, and Why?

Well Corrupt Courts, Corrupt Judges, Favored Attorneys, Conflicts of Interest and well a whole lot of reasons that have nothing to do with the Rule of LAW, the Real Laws, the Constitution of the United States and the Real Facts of the Iviewit Stolen Patent Case.

All this stuff in the last week leads me to believe that possibly Lamont has been on the Wrong Side of this for Years, and Well something - somehow blew his Cover... It was NOT me.. for the Iviewit Documents had been OUT THERE for 8 years... I post them and P. Stephen Lamont TELLS me to Get My Affairs in Order.. .while I Still have Affairs... WHAT?

What is Really Going on with P. Stephen Lamont and who in this High Finance, Trillion Dollar Patent Heist is P. Stephen Lamont REALLY teamed up with... ???

If you have any information on all this...
please Email Investigative Blogger
Crystal L. Cox at Crystal@CrystalCox.com

Crystal