This complaint was filed after the US Attorney Office's claimed they had no case file

This complaint was filed after the US Attorney Office's claimed they had no case file for the case the FBI had prior presented to them.

Department of Justice, FBI, US Attorney Office
2007 06 14 Letter to the Department of Justice ~ Office of Professional Responsibility, H. Marshall Jarrett, at the request of the DOJ-OIG, regarding missing Iviewit case files at the FBI & US Attorney offices

DOJ

Thefts of the companies intellectual property by our Patent Attorneys and the hosts of other crimes committed in the attempt to cover it up..

from www.Iviewit.TV

"Information pertaining to the thefts of the companies intellectual property by our patent attorneys and the hosts of other crimes committed in the attempt to cover it up through abuse of public offices.

Abuses elevating to state supreme court public offices of The Florida Bar and Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division First & Second Department Disciplinary Committees. To evade prosecution partners were planted in conflict to handle complaints in conflict while holding public office and stymie the company's efforts.

The same attorneys remain under federal investigations by the patent office and other regulatory bodies and where such investigations have caused the Commissioner of Patents to suspend the Iviewit patent applications, pending charges of fraud on the United States Patent and Trademark Office, as well as, fraud upon the Iviewit shareholders.

Investigations are underway into the stolen investment funds of the company including monies from the federally backed Small Business Administration.

Iviewit has spent several years building its case against our former attorneys, accountants and management and would have had far more success if conflicts of interests, abuses of public offices and other nefarious crimes to cover up and deny due process had not interfered with the company complaints to authorities.

In not one, but two states, Supreme Court agencies have been penetrated by Proskauer partners acting in violation of office positions to block complaints against them and their partners. As the case elevated to the United States Supreme Court for review of the Florida case for violation of public offices by Christopher Wheeler and Matthew Triggs, the Supreme Court would not review the case.

The Florida Supreme Court and then the United States Supreme Court by failing to review the matters, precluded Iviewit shareholders from filing complaints against the attorney's caught in verified conflicts of interest and abuse of public office.

Thus, the state and United States Supreme Court's by denying Iviewit to file complaints, as provided for in the Florida and United States constitution's has denied shareholders the right to file complaints against public officers and attorney's Wheeler and Matthew Triggs for their violations of Florida Supreme Court public offices.

Turning the courts into an attorney protection agency along with the state bar associations, these institutions appear to fail constitutional mandates that allow citizens to complain against public officers caught violating office. Our rights denied, it is feeling a bit Russian here and this is leading to more than just patent theft from the shareholders but now a denial of due process that may soon elevate into Patentgate.

Iviewit is an Intellectual Property (IP) asset management company focused on the development and extension of its "critical path" imaging & video processes into the marketplace.

Currently the companies patent portfolio is partially suspended (USPTO SUSPENSION LETTER) by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) Commissioner, pending investigation of charges of (FILING OF CHARGES OF FRAUD UPON THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE CHARGES FILED BY IVIEWIT AND CROSSBOW VENTURES).

Where the filings claim that Iviewit former patent counsel and others have committed fraud not only against the Iviewit shareholders but fraud upon the USPTO directly in filing fraudulent and false statements of oaths on patent applications.

Additionally there are other crimes to attempt to steal such inventions, inventions that have been heralded by leading experts as the Holy Grail inventions of our times.

The charges were filed by Iviewit and it's largest investor, Crossbow Ventures of West Palm Beach, FL, after information from the Director of the Office of Enrollment and Discipline (OED) for the USPTO, Harry I. Moatz (Moatz) showed that foul play appears to have taken place in the filings by the attorneys. Subsequently the attorneys and firms involved, including (Proskauer Rose LLP, Foley and Lardner, Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolfe and Schlissel, Blakely Sokoloff Zafman and Taylor, Kenneth Rubenstein, Raymond Joao, William Dick, Steven Becker, Christopher Wheeler and Douglas Boehm) are under investigation by Moatz and the USPTO for such crimes.

Crossbow Ventures monies invested were also two-thirds funded by the federally backed Small Business Administration (SBA) where the SBA is in fact the largest shareholder in the iviewit intellectual properties.

The SBA is the most financially damaged shareholder by their crimes. Where the SBA Inspector General's Offices has begun to audit the trail of their monies and where their investment in the patents went.

All Iviewit shareholders should be aware that the companies board closed the company with no notice to shareholders that they were disbanding the corporate entities. This appears to violate laws in Deleware and Florida.

These crimes and many other has been reported to the Federal Bureau of Investigation, where Special Agent Stephen Luchessi has taken these matters to the United States Attorney approximately one year ago.

We have asked for filing under RICO with the FBI as these crimes involved a number of law firms and others, acting in concert to and violating enough of laws that qualify for RICO status. We suggest that you write to your congressional leaders regarding your stock, how to report it and what actions are being taken to direct the patents and stock back into your names.

Already, as most shareholders are aware the stocks maybe worth several thousand times their original value. Please contact the company if you would like to know the current status of investigations and whom to write in your state. The Company has filed for Congressional help with The Honorable United States Senator Dianne Feinstein of California. "

Source of this Post
http://www.iviewit.tv/about/index.htm
stolen patent kenneth rubenstein

FBI Probes Threats on Federal Witnesses in NY Ethics Scandal

"" New York, New York, November 21, 2008- Sources have confirmed that Federal Agents in New York and Washington, D.C. are actively investigating complaints of witness tampering in the New York State Ethics Scandal pending in the federal District Court in Manhattan.

Legal Authority: Pay to Play
The latest probe began in July of 2008 when numerous individuals went to federal authorities with various accounts of illegal payoffs to New York State employees at the Departmental Disciplinary Committee (“DDC”) at 61 Broadway in lower Manhattan.

The DDC investigates ethics complaints against attorneys in Manhattan and The Bronx, and has been long believed to be a corrupt, political vendetta machine.

One cooperating attorney is quoted as saying, “I did not have to worry about any ethics complaints because I always paid my insurance premiums to the DDC. Everyone knew what was going on.”

Witness Tampering: Threats on a Federal Witness
Federal Agents from two different offices sprung into high gear after the summer when a DDC supervising attorney threatened another state-employed DDC attorney under his direction.

The DDC staff attorney was apparently confronted days before his sworn testimony was to begin in the ethics probe, and the intended message was made perfectly clear, says the source, adding, “You have a very serious situation requiring immediate involvement by federal authorities anytime someone confronts a federal witness and warns that a death may result from testimony.”

New York Norm: Obstruction of Justice
The allegations, and initial findings, were serious enough for investigators from New York State to forward the troubling reports to federal agencies.

Attorney General Andrew Cuomo was initially apprised of the witness tampering allegations and he has been tracking the various federal inquiries since.

And it has been confirmed that Appellate Division, First Department, Presiding Justice Jonathan Lippman ordered that the involved DDC supervising attorney be immediately transferred to his courthouse at 27 Madison Avenue from the DDC offices on Broadway where the threatened attorney works. Another court insider believes it’s “just another OCA cover-up,” adding, “no one in the First Department - or anywhere in the State - wants an ethics committee supervising attorney spilling the beans to a crowd of FBI agents.”

Recently appointed DDC chairman, Roy Reardon, according to sources, has been involved in DDC affairs on an almost daily basis, and he has acknowledged the seriousness of the physical threats and psychiatric issues involved. “To his credit,” says the source, “Roy Reardon took immediate action after he confirmed that he was staring at witness tampering by one of his DDC supervising attorneys. It was Roy who first suggested the transfer.”

It has been long rumored that virtually any ethics complaint, no matter how serious or criminal, could be made to disappear for “favored attorneys.”

“The feds are now beginning to understand that a ‘favored attorney’ in New York doesn’t just involve political connections.

A New York ‘favored attorney’ is one who pays,” says one attorney who has practiced in the federal court system for over thirty years, and who asked not to be identified.

It is believed that the underlying federal action is Anderson v. State of New York (SDNY), though there are other ethics cases pending, and some before the 2nd Circuit - all involving charges of corruption at the DDC.

“Win at all Costs” and “No Regard for Laws or Ethics” Hits National Agenda

The latest allegations coincide with the obstruction of justice case in the Eastern District Court in Brooklyn against defense attorney Robert Simels and his associate Arienne Irving, who each face up to 10 years in prison for allegedly seeking to use bribes and violence to prevent witnesses from testifying against one of their clients.

Tamanny Hall II – New York Court’s Cesspool Seeps to Washington, D.C.
In November of 2008, the U.S. Supreme Court decided to hear Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal, a case that centers on state level ethics and judges beholden to financial supporters. The Brennan Center and other advocacy groups have called the issues egregious, matters that raise underlying questions about due process on a national level.

See, "The Unethical Ethics Committee" @

http://exposecorruptcourts.blogspot.com/2007/11/unethical-ethics-committee-sealed.html

See, Background story on New York-Style Ethics, "Sex Scandal at Attorney Committee on Character and Fitness"
@
http://exposecorruptcourts.blogspot.com/2007/06/sex-scandal-at-attorney-committee-on.html

OFFICIAL NOTICE TO THIS COMMITTEE:

THE STATE OF NEW YORK and
OTHER LIABLE NEW YORK GOVERNMENT AGENCIES
that are named Defendants in my Lawsuit, Face a Twelve Trillion Dollar Plus Liability that may not be reported properly in the Liability Section of their financials with State Regulators causing further Direct Liabilities to NY State and the People of NY, dwarfing the size of Madoff, Stanford and Dreier combined by thousands fold.

Other Federal Offices have been notified and are involved and actively investigating the claims, including Inspector General Glenn Fine of USDOJ; the Office of Professional Responsibility ( OPR ) of the FBI, the Office of Enrollment & Discipline ( OED ) of the US Patent Office, the Commissioner of the USPTO, the SBA Inspector General, the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration and more. ""


Source

http://74.125.155.132/search?q=cache:ktIVkVh6K68J:www.iviewit.tv/20091005%2520NY%2520Judiciary%2520Committee%2520Prepared%2520Statement.doc+site://www.iviewit.tv+question&cd=2&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us
Pay to Play Attorney