NASDAQ:INTC - Open Letter to Intel Corp Board of Directors and INTC Shareholders over Massive INTC Liability.

Intellectual Property THEFT by Intel Corp - INTC

Intel Corp. Executives have Been Hiding a Very Big Secret from the Intel Corp - INTC Board of Directors, and Intel Corp's Shareholders for Over a Decade Now.

Intel Corp is involved in a Stolen Technology Scandal over the IViewit Technologies, and Intel Corp CEO Paul Otellini has been covering it up.

Then General Counsel Bruce Sewell also covered up this Massive Proven Fraud. This is FACT, there are Links in this Letter to Prove it.

For over a Decade the Corruption in Courts, Law Firms and in Government Agencies have Covered for Intel Corp Executives.

However, those days are over Now. And when it is time to pay the Iviewit TechnologyInventors for their Invention USED by Intel Corp. for Over a Decade, well it will be the Intel Corp. Shareholders and Intel Corp Board of Directors that pays for the Crimes and Cover Ups of the Intel Corp. Executives.

Intel Corp. has been Named in an SEC Complaint over the Stolen Iviewit Technology

Click Here to Read the SEC Complaint Naming Intel Corp.

Intel Corp Has also been named in a 12 Trillion Dollar Federal RICO Lawsuit over the Stolen Iviewit Technology.

ATTENTION:

Jane E. Shaw, Ambassador Charlene Barshefsky,Wilmer Cutler Pickering, Susan L. Decker,
John J. Donahoe,Reed E. Hundt, James D. Plummer, John M. Fluke, Frederick E. Terman,David S. Pottruck, Frank D. Yeary, Vice Chancellor, David B. Yoffie, Max and Doris Starr.

This Open Letter Will Go to ALL Intel Corp. Board of Directors, Shareholders, Insurance Carriers and ALL Government Agencies Involved to serve as YET another Warning of what will happen to Intel Corp. Shareholders. Just as in the Madoff Scandal, they CANNOT Say they Did Not Know. There is a Whole lot of Fact, Proof that they Did Know and DO Know RIGHT NOW.

Please Forward this Letter to ALL Intel Corp. Investors, Shareholders, Directors, Executives that You Know of. This is a VERY Big Deal Financially. It is NOT a Hoax, Look at the Fact yourself and Warn Others.

The Stolen Iviewit Technology will Cost Intel Corp. Investors, Shareholders Billions. CEO Paul Otellini of Intel Corp. KNOWS of this Massive Shareholder and is NOT Disclosing to Intel Corps. Board of Directors, Shareholders or Insurance Carriers.

It is Your Money, You Have a Right to Know that Billions will be Paid By Intel Corp. in theIviewit Technology Theft. It is not a Matter of IF, the Proof is ALL there. It is a Matter of When.

Here is Proof that Intel Corps. CEO Paul Otellini and then Intel Corp. General Counsel Bruce Sewell knew of the Stolen Iviewit Technology and have Yet to Disclose to Intel Corps. Board of Directors, Shareholders or Insurance Carriers to this day.

http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States

%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20090306%20

Intel%20Demand%20Letter%20&%20Liability%20Exposure%

20%20Signed%203549l.pdf

For More information on the iViewit Stolen Technology Go To

DeniedPatent.com

More Links and Resources to Intel's Involvement in a 13 Trillion Dollar Technology Theft

http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=288

http://www.antitrustviolations.com/2011/01/intel-shareholder-fraud-over-iviewit.html

More Proof on Intel Corp. Cover Ups

SEC Galleon, Intel Capital Complaint Click Here

Click Below For FTC Investigators Reports on MORE Cover Ups by Intel Corp.

http://www.docstoc.com/docs/51737284/Proof-Of-Intel-Cartel---RICO-Proof

Crystal L. Cox

Investigative Blogger
Crystal@CrystalCox.com

Please Share EVERYWHERE you Think it Will Help to STOP Intel Corp Executive from Hiding Mass Shareholder Fraud, and to Protect Shareholders and Inventors RIGHTS.

Eliot Bernstein of Iviewit Technologies files SEC and FBI Complaint with Mary Schapiro, against Warner Bros., AOL Inc., Time Warner, Intel, SGI,

SEC Complaint Filed, is the SEC Listening .. It Does not sound like it. The SEC must be covering up for Favors owed, covering and protecting billionair tech companies and Above the Law Law Firms Like Foley and Lardner and Proskauer Rose.

Eliot Bernstein of Iviewit Technologies files SEC & FBI Complaint with Mary Schapiro & Others against Warner Bros., AOL Inc., Time Warner, Intel, SGI, Lockheed Martin, Proskauer Rose, Foley & Lardner.

"" March 14, 2010 --

FORMAL CRIMINAL COMPLAINT TO SEC & FBI
RE SHAREHOLDER FRAUD BY LEADING BLUE CHIPS

Corp Management of Time Warner (NYSE: TWX), Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc., AOL Inc. (NYSE: AOL), Intel Corporation (NASDAQ: INTC), Silicon Graphics, Inc. (delisted NYSE: SGI) & successor Silicon Graphics International (NASDAQ: SGI), Sony Corporation (NYSE/ADR: SNE) , Lockheed Martin Corporation (NYSE: LMT), Ernst & Young Global Limited have known about the Trillion Dollar Iviewit Liabilities for years & allegedly have concealed the liabilities from Shareholders & in some instances reorganized to the detriment of Shareholders in alleged fraudulent transactions, which may lead to Shareholder Rescissory Rights & catastrophic damage to the companies as complained of to Fed Officials.FEB 12, 2010 CRIMINAL COMPLAINTThe SEC Complaint filed Feb 12, 2010,

“Iviewit & Eliot I. Bernstein Official Formal Complaint…against Warner Bros. Entertainment, Inc., AOL Inc. & Time Warner, regarding Trillion Dollar alleged Fraud on Shareholders; FASB No. 5 & other SEC accounting violations & violations of State, Federal & Int’l Laws; Rescissory Rights of Shareholders; Evidence & Important Info for the SEC regarding ongoing SEC Investigations of Bernard L. Madoff, Marc S. Dreier, Sir Robert Allen Stanford, Proskauer Rose, Galleon, Enron Broadband, Enron, Arthur Andersen & more”

http://www.iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=274

and

http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20100206%20FINAL%20SEC%20FBI%20and%20more%20COMPLAINT%20Against%20Warner%20Bros%20Time%20Warner%20AOL176238nscolorlow.pdf

SEC COMPLAINT INTEL, LOCKHEED MARTIN & SGIA SEC complaint also was filed by Iviewit against Intel, SGI & Lockheed & similar allegations were levied against these corps for Patent Theft, knowing infringement & Shareholder Fraud.

The March 29th 2009 SEC Complaint to Shapiro titled “Complaint Regarding Intel Corp & Possible Trillion Dollar Fraud on Intel Shareholders & Others”http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20090325%20FINAL%20Intel%20SEC%20Complaint%20SIGNED2073.pdf

12 COUNT 12 TRILLION DOLLAR FED RICO & ANTITRUST SUIT LEGALLY MARKED “RELATED” TO NY SUPREME COURT WHISTLEBLOWER SUIT

Liabilities for the complained of companies centers on both knowing technology infringements & liabilities from failure to report the Fed RICO & ANTITRUST filed by Iviewit & now legally marked “RELATED” to the Whistleblower suit of Christine C. Anderson, a former staff attorney for the NY Supreme Court Appellate Division. Anderson gave riveting testimony of systemic corruption to the NY State Senate Judiciary & in sworn testimony in before Judge Shira Scheindlin of Whitewashing & Criminal Obstruction by Court Officials for “Favored Lawyers & Law Firms, the US Attorney in New York, the DA and Asst DA” or words to that effect. Anderson further fingered one of the “CLEANERS” of ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT COMPLAINTS at the NY Supreme Court as Naomi Goldstein.A “CLEANER” at the ETHICS department of NY responsible for attorney regulation in Manhattan & the WallStreet financial district, perhaps the reason the country is suffering from a lack of attorney regulation in the heart of the financial district that has led to lax or complicit regulators and prosecutors and a worldwide economic meltdown.

Anderson’s testimony http://www.iviewit.tv/20090608nysjudiciaryhearing/index.htmhttp://www.iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=205

Bernstein testimony before the NY Senate Judiciary of systemic corruption that has blocked due process & procedure via corrupt infiltration of the NY Courts @http://www.iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=189http://www.iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=165

HOUSE OF CARD COLLAPSING ON NY CRIME SYNDICATE INSIDE NY COURTS, ETHICS DEPARTMENTS, PUBLIC OFFICES & REGULATORY AGENCIES BY CRIMINAL LAW FIRMS & LAWYERSThe House of Cards is Crumbling on Key Players in the Iviewit Scandal as the NY Corruption Scandal Elevates to Senior NY Political Figures including Cuomo & members of the NY Supreme Court & US Fed Courts in NY. Proskauer Rose.

Proskauer, mastermind of the bungled attempt to steal the Iviewit patents through Fraud on the US Patent Office & further bungled attempts to cover up the crimes in the NY Courts is under further scrutiny with Proskauer’s direct involvement in the Stanford Financial Ponzi & subsequent resignation of partner Thomas Sjoblom, a former SEC enforcement officer, allegedly found coaching Stanford employees on how to lie to SEC & FBI investigators at a Miami Airport Hanger preceding the arrest of Stanford & his employees.

Proskauer also sued in a Class Action suit for the entire 7 billion dollar Stanford losses & sued by an arrested Stanford employee. Proskauer has further direct ties to both the Madoff & Dreier Ponzis.NY Attorney General CuomoFollowing the illegal representation by the NY AG in the Iviewit RICO & ANTITRUST suit & Anderson’s Whistleblower suit under Spitzer as NY AG, the Cuomo Admin continues to represent illegally State Defendants in both cases left over by Spitzer (a named Defendant in the RICO and Antitrust).

As the Iviewit & Anderson claims are further investigated & litigated these present the largest liability to Cuomo’s run for any office as the largest scandal brewing in NY begins to unravel with his offices dead center.

Anderson’s filing http://www.frankbrady.org/TammanyHall/Documents_files/Anderson%20111609%20Filing.pdf

Iviewit filings of Illegal rep by Cuomo @http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20080305%20Final%20Plaintiff%20Oposition%20to%20AG%20Cuomo%20letter%20email%20copy.pdfhttp://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20090129%20Final%20Extension%20of%20Time%202%20SIGNED%20low.pdf

The US District CourtWith Anderson’s revelations in the US District Court & the Jury finding that her 1st Amendment Rights to Free Speech regarding Whistleblower Allegations had been violated, the whole case has been called into question & further questioned due to the ILLEGAL REPRESENTATION of the NY AG Cuomo’s office. Based on Cuomo’s illegal representation of State Officials, Anderson filed for an entirely new hearing based on the Cuomo’s mass conflicts. Iviewit alleges that NY AG Cuomo’s illegal representation of State Defendants, Officially & Personally, violates his office duties & obligations of honest services to NY, public office rules and violates state & federal laws, whereby the Conflicts of Interest act to block investigation of the State Defendants fingered by Whistleblower Anderson & in Iviewit’s suit, causing Obstruction of Justice through Fraud on the Court. Serious allegations for Cuomo who continues to illegally represent State Officials on public funds, while failing to investigate those same public officials, including former NY Chief Judge Judith Kaye.

Also of concern is if these massive liabilities have been reported to State Auditors by Cuomo?The US 2nd CircuitIn the US Second Circuit, Iviewit filed a “Motion to Compel” compelling that court to follow law, as with Anderson’s revelations exposing court members, that court has tried to ILLEGALLY Dismiss all the legally “related” cases to Anderson in attempts to bury them & keep the lids on the scandal that may lead them to exchange their legal robes for prison garb. Motion to Compel

http://www.iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=78http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20090908%20FINAL%20Emergency%20Motion%20to%20Compel%20SIGNED44948.pdf ""

"Addressed to:
SEC Chair Mary Shapiro
SEC IG, H. David Kotz
IG OF THE US DOJ, Glenn Fine
FBI
HOUSE & SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE
NY SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE
US AG, Eric Holder

Treasury IG, David Gouvaia
SBA IG, Peggy Gustafson & Daniel O’Rourke

US DEP OF COMMERCE IG, Todd Zinser
Under Sec of Commerce for Intellectual Property & Dir of the USPTO, David Kappos
Deputy Under Sec of Commerce for Intellectual Property & Deputy Dir of the USPTO, Sharon Barner

USPTO - OFFICE OF ENROLLMENT & DISCIPLINE DIR, Harry I. Moatz
US PRESIDENT, Hon President of the US, Barack H. Obama II
FILED AGAINST
Warner Bros. Entertainment, Inc.
Chair & CEO: Barry Meyer

Pres & COO: Alan Horn
EVP & CFO: Edward Romano
VP & Chief Patent Counsel: Wayne Smith
AOL, Inc.
Chair & CEO: Tim Armstrong
GC & EVP: Ira Parker
Counsel - Patent Lit, Prosecution & Licensing: Christopher Day
Exec Escalation Team: Jerry McKinley

Time Warner, Inc.
Chair & CEO: Jeffrey Bewkes
EVP & GC: Paul Cappuccio
MARCH 29, 2009 SEC COMPLAINT INTEL, LOCKHEED MARTIN & SGI "

Press Release for Immediate Release

NASDAQ: INTC - Open Letter to Intel Corp Board of Directors and Intel Corp Shareholders to DISCLOSE Massive Fraud

Intel Corp. Executives have Been Hiding a Very Big Secret from Intel Corp.'s Board of Directors, and Intel Corp.'s Shareholders for Over a Decade Now.

Intel Corp. is involved in a Stolen Technology Scandal over the IViewit Technologies, and Intel Corp. CEO Paul Otellini has been covering it up. Then General Counsel Bruce Sewell also covered up this Massive Proven Fraud. This is FACT, there are Links in this Letter to Prove it.

For over a Decade the Corruption in Courts, Law Firms and in Government Agencies have Covered for Intel Corp Executives.

However, those days are over Now. And when it is time to pay the Iviewit TechnologyInventors for their Invention USED by Intel Corp. for Over a Decade, well it will be the Intel Corp. Shareholders and Intel Corp Board of Directors that pays for the Crimes and Cover Ups of the Intel Corp Executives.

Intel Corp has been Named in an SEC Complaint over the Stolen Iviewit Technology

Click Here to Read the SEC Complaint Naming Intel Corp.

Intel Corp. Has also been named in a 12 Trillion Dollar Federal RICO Lawsuit over the Stolen Iviewit Technology.

ATTENTION:

Jane E. Shaw, Ambassador Charlene Barshefsky,Wilmer Cutler Pickering, Susan L. Decker,
John J. Donahoe,Reed E. Hundt, James D. Plummer, John M. Fluke, Frederick E. Terman,David S. Pottruck, Frank D. Yeary, Vice Chancellor, David B. Yoffie, Max and Doris Starr.

This Open Letter Will Go to ALL Intel Corp. Board of Directors, Shareholders, Insurance Carriers and ALL Government Agencies Involved to serve as YET another Warning of what will happen to Intel Corp. Shareholders. Just as in the Madoff Scandal, they CANNOT Say they Did Not Know. There is a Whole lot of Fact, Proof that they Did Know and DO Know RIGHT NOW.

Please Forward this Letter to ALL Intel Corp. Investors, Shareholders, Directors, Executives that You Know of. This is a VERY Big Deal Financially. It is NOT a Hoax, Look at the Fact yourself and Warn Others.

The Stolen Iviewit Technology will Cost Intel Corp. Investors, Shareholders Billions. CEO Paul Otellini of Intel Corp. KNOWS of this Massive Shareholder and is NOT Disclosing to Intel Corps. Board of Directors, Shareholders or Insurance Carriers.

It is Your Money, You Have a Right to Know that Billions will be Paid By Intel Corp. in theIviewit Technology Theft. It is not a Matter of IF, the Proof is ALL there. It is a Matter of When.

Here is Proof that Intel Corps. CEO Paul Otellini and then Intel Corp. General Counsel Bruce Sewell knew of the Stolen Iviewit Technology and have Yet to Disclose to Intel Corps. Board of Directors, Shareholders or Insurance Carriers to this day.

http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States

%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20090306%20

Intel%20Demand%20Letter%20&%20Liability%20Exposure%

20%20Signed%203549l.pdf

For More information on the iViewit Stolen Technology Go To

DeniedPatent.com

More Links and Resources to Intel's Involvement in a 13 Trillion Dollar Technology Theft

http://iViewit.tv/wordpress/?p=288

http://www.AntitrustViolations.com/2011/01/intel-shareholder-fraud-over-iviewit.html

More Proof on Intel Corp. Cover Ups

SEC Galleon, Intel Capital Complaint Click Here

Click Below For FTC Investigators Reports on MORE Cover Ups by Intel Corp.

http://www.docstoc.com/docs/51737284/Proof-Of-Intel-Cartel---RICO-Proof

http://IntelCorruption.blogspot.com/

Bruce Sewell, then Intel Corp General Counsel Now the

General Counsel at APPLE

Click Here for Information on Intel Corp CEO Paul Otellini

Crystal L. Cox

Investigative Blogger
Crystal@CrystalCox.com

Please Share EVERYWHERE you Think it Will Help to STOP Intel Corp Executive from Hiding Mass Shareholder Fraud, and to Protect Shareholders and Inventors RIGHTS.

Intel Corp. Named in New SEC Complaint by Iviewit Technologies - Paul Otellini - Bruce Sewell

Intel Corp. - Paul Otelleni - Bruce Sewell,
Major Shareholder Liability Pending

· March 06, 2009 Iviewit Letter of Liabilities to Intel
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20090306%20Intel%20Demand%20Letter%20&%20Liability%20Exposure%20%20Signed%203549l.pdf

· March 25, 2009 Iviewit SEC Complaint Filed
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20090306%20Intel%20Demand%20Letter%20&%20Liability%20Exposure%20%20Signed%203549l.pdf

· September 15, 2009 Apple Press Release ~
Intel Counsel Bruce Sewell departs Intel to Apple

http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2009/09/15sewell.html

· January 16, 2002 The Register “SGI transfers 3D graphics patents to MS [Microsoft]
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20020116%20SGI%20transfers%20patents%20to%20MICROSOFT.pdf

Intel Capital Rajiv Goel indicted by SEC and Intel Corporation is a defendant in my Federal RICO and ANTITRUST Lawsuit.

· Intel Capital Rajiv Goel, a managing director at Intel Corporation has been implicated by the SEC in the Galleon Complaint.

o The SEC should take note that one of the first people on the scene at the time of the Iviewit inventions was a one Hassan Miah (“Miah”), who signed NDA’s while analyzing Iviewit as an Investment for EarthLink founders Sky Dylan Dayton and Kevin O’Donnell.

Hassan Miah had worked at the Intel / Creative Artist Agency (“CAA”) Multimedia Lab prior to involvement with Iviewit and upon viewing the inventions, called them the “Holy Grail” of the Digital Imaging and Video world, including the Internet. Later Miah again joined Intel at Intel Capital.

From Hassan Miah’s Biography @ Digital Hollywood

http://www.digitalhollywood.com/%231-DHEurope/London-WednesdayFive.html , I quote,

“ Hassan Miah is the former Managing Director of Intel Capital, where he led worldwide media and entertainment investments.

Today, he remains an advisor to Intel Corporation’s Digital Home Group, which is responsible for the company’s global consumer PC product line.

He is also the former head of New Media for CAA, one of Hollywood’s leading entertainment and talent agencies. While at Intel, Mr. Miah led such media related investments as Bellrock Media, Synacor, Zinio, Black Arrow, Clickstar and Gametrust.

At CAA, Mr. Hassan Miah established and headed the CAA / Intel Media Lab, the first significant collaboration between Hollywood and a major technology company, and helped form Tele-TV, a joint investment by NYNEX, PacBell and Bell Atlantic to provide interactive video television services over phone lines. Before joining CAA, Mr. Miah was a Management Consulting Partner for KPMG LLP, specializing in media and entertainment transactions.

At KPMG, he helped structure such transactions as the sale of MCA Universal Studios to Matsushita, the sale of Geffen Records to Universal and Polygram’s acquisition of A&M Records.

Hassan Miah also has extensive operating/managerial experience having developed and sold companies in the digital media sector during his career, e.g., after creating the first consumer MP3 recording software, Mr. Miah successfully sold Xing Technology Corp. to Real Networks at a 10x multiple from when he joined the company less than two years after becoming CEO.

Hassan Miah is a CPA and received a B.A. in Business from the University of Michigan and a M.B.A. from Stanford University’s Graduate School of Business.”

o April 27, 1999 letter from Richard R. Rosman, Esq. to Hassan Miah regarding the Iviewit inventions and Proskauer Rose Partner Rubenstein’s opinion on the technologies.

Note that Rubenstein and Miah know each other through MPEG and Miah’s former employer XING. Immediately after learning of the Iviewit inventions, Miah sold XING to Real Networks as indicated above.

http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/1999%2004%2026%20Wheeler%20Letter%20to%20Rosman%20re%20Rubenstein%20opinion.pdf

o June 01, 1999 – Donald G. Kane, Managing Director at Goldman Sachs letter regarding Hassan Miah and Miah’s letter requesting to speak to Rubenstein.

http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/1999%2006%2001%20HASSAN%20LETTER%20FORWARDED%20TO%20RUBENSTEIN.pdf

o Roomy Khan, a convicted felon and former Intel employee is pleading guilty in the Galleon case and the relations between Iviewit and Intel are already described herein.

Robert W. Moffat, Jr. ~ Senior Vice President, Integrated Operations at IBM Corporation.

· The SEC should note that IBM is a Defendant in my Federal RICO and ANTITRUST Lawsuit.

March 25, 2009 SEC COMPLAINT –
Real 3D, Inc,, Intel, Silicon Graphics and Lockheed Martin

http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20090325%20FINAL%20Intel%20SEC%20Complaint%20SIGNED2073.pdf

Full SEC Complaint Click Here
Read the Details that YOUR Intel Corp. Executive Having Been
Keep from you the Shareholders of Intel... and they have been
Failing to Disclose this Major Shareholder Liablity for Quite Some Time.

Posted Here by
Investigative Blogger
Crystal L. Cox

More on the Trillion Dollar Iviewit Stolen Patent
at www.DeniedPatent.com and www.Iviewit.TV

Does Mary Shapiro SEC Boss, Know about the Iviewit Stolen Patent Case and Its HUGE Implications of Shareholders?

It seems from Many documents at www.iViewit.TV That Mary Sapiro of the SEC had knowledgle long ago about what Proskauer Rose was up to and yet .. what ?? the Standford affair is some NEW Shocker of a Story, yet Mary Shapiro had been given notice by Eliot Bernstein and the Iviewit Company years before the Billion Dollar Scandal hit the Main Stream Media.

Does Mary Shapiro or the SEC have ANY Liability to the Shareholders when they had advance knowledge of the Players and did nothing to prevent the Standford Affair?

$65 Billion in the Bernie Madoff Scheme is NOT all that Mary Shapiro and the SEC missed... What about the Standford Affair - Billions and Connected to Proskauer Rose. What About Enron and Proskauer Connections - and what about all the Players, Shareholder Fraud, and Liability that the Eliot Bernstein of the Iviewit Technologies Company has brought to Mary Shapiro and the SEC's Attention ?

What do they say, I just did not know or see this coming? So Sorry you Lost Billions - I had no Way of Knowing... well Crystal L. Cox, Investigative Blogger says.. "BULL, Mary Shapiro and the SEC knew" and they IGNORED leads, had no one seemingly watching websites, reading documents, scouring blogs or even looking into leads that led to BILLIONS of Innocent Investors losing their Money.

The SEC has no purpose that is really beneficial and in my Opinion is just as susceptible as being Bought Off as anyone other Corrupt Government Agent, Attorney, CEO or Judge" .

Won't it be Amusing when Warner Brothers, Intel Corp., Sony, AOL, and all those Billion Dollar Tech Companies go Belly up and take the Shareholders to Bankruptcy because of the Contracts they signed and did not fulfill with the Iviewit Technologies Company that puts them in Connection and at least in part Liable for a Trillion Dollar Liability that they SEEM to have overlooked on their Books with all their bragging of Profits this quarter... blah .. blah.. blah.. and what Does Mary Shapiro Say? Is she even Acknowledging any of it?

Won't it be Hysterically when the SEC, when Mary Shapiro says to the Warner Brothers, AOL, Intel Corp, Sony ... Shareholders that Gee I just didn't see that Trillion Dollar HIT Coming.. We had no warning.. other then the years of complaints filed from the Iviewit Technologies Company in Which I IGNORED.. gee Sorry..

It is not Personal, it is Business,
Mary Schapiro - YOUR FIRED !!!..

posted By Investigative Blogger
Crystal L. Cox...
Crystal Cox
More on the Obvious, Blatant Shareholder Fraud among tons of Major Tech Companies.. and the Iviewit Stolen Patent Story at www.DeniedPatent.com and at www.Iviewit.TV over a thousand documents of Proof So Far.
Mary Shapiro
Research Links on Mary Shapiro and her Knowledge of possible Shareholder Fraud in which, to me it looks like she did nothing, and well Billions upon Billions are lost by innocent Investors. And the Potention of Trillions More...

http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20090325%20SEC%20FAX%20Cover%20Page.pdf

http://www.trialbyblog.com/2010/01/eliot-i-bernstein-intel-corporation-sec.html

http://www.free-press-release.com/news-iviewit-trillion-fed-suit-defendant-proskauer-rose-sued-in-global-class-action-re-stanford-ponzi-1252249099.html

http://seekingalpha.com/user/478415/comments/highest-rated

http://www.stolenpatent.com/2010_01_01_archive.html


Gee Sorry ... NO One Brought it to My Attention: I just Did not See ANY sign of this COMING... What a Crock that Will BE..

Crystal Cox Blogger

Blatant and Obvious Fraud on the US Court System. Patent Office Fraud, Patent Attorney Corruption, Supreme Court Corruption, Trillions of Dollars.

The Iviewit Stolen Patent Story is very interesting to Say the Least as it Exposes Corruption in US Courts, Exposes Patent Attorneys Ease in which they can Steal Inventions, Exposes Supreme Court Judges and Attorney Bar Association that Cover Up the Corruption, Side Deals and Favoritism among preferred - Elite - Wealthy Attorneys, and Really wakes you up to Big Corporations Like Intel Corp., Lockheed Martin, Time Warner Inc., Sony, and all the Other major Corporations participating in this Cover Up to Deny Inventors Rights, Deny Due Process and Continue Using their Technology - Simply Ignore 8 and 10 year old Contracts, Blatantly VIOLATED Confidentiality Agreements and violating Law after Law with thus far - No Accountability.

The US Patent Office Deny Rights of Inventors and Seem to be Holding up Investigations for year after year while Real Peoples Live are On Hold and In Danger.

The US Bankruptcy Court System has blatant Obvious Proven Fraud as in the Silicon Graphics Bankruptcy - the Conflicts of Interest and Illegal behavior and For Some Reason, thus far the US Bankruptcy Courts can't seem to see what has happened.

And though there are Literally thousands of Pages of documents of Proof, the US Court Sytem Seems to be Aiding And Abetting the Criminals in all this, Seemingly just because they are Major US Corporations, Meg-Law Firms, Court Judges, Supreme Court Judges, and State Attorney Bars - there is so Much Corruption Truly Where Does One Begin.

We Begin by Understanding the Iviewit Stolen Patent Story, who the Criminals Are, Who are the seemingly Protected Patent Attorneys in all this, Which Supreme Court Judges are Looking the Other way to this Blatant and Obvious Corruption, Who in the State Attorney Bar Complaint Process is Allow this. Once we understand this at least to Some Degree we can see how this happens in the US Courts and How those In Judicial Power Either Willing Let it Happen, Accept Bribes and Pay Offs, or are Threatened Somehow.

How Does a Trillion Dollar Patent Heist Get Pulled Off and For over a Decade So Far.

Well Go to the Links Below and Find Out More on How this Level of Corruption Happens in Your United States Court System.

Click Here to Read what Judge Shira A. Scheindlin, U.S.D.J had to Say in August of 2008 about the Fraud, Deceit, and Misrepresentation in the Iviewit Stolen Patent Case.

Also Check Out www.DeniedPatent.com for Names and Players and How A Theft of this Magnitude Can Be Pulled Off in the United States.

Also Go to www.Iviewit.TV Scroll Down Read Through some Documents, I know it is a Lot to Take in, but boy does it Open your Eyes to How Easy Trillion Dollar Heists Really are when you Know the Right People and have the Right Money.

Smaller inventors Smackdown - David Kappos, USPTO formerly IBM ....the Whining of Billion Dollar Tech Companies

From the Article Below we see more Evidence of how David Kappos's IBM connections and his appointment to the USPTO was Deliberat to Shut up those Small Inventors as they try and license their Technology.

$$$$$$

"" IBM veteran gets panel OK to run patent office
Kappos helped run massive patent operation; Full vote expected in Sept.

SAN FRANCISCO (MarketWatch) - David Kappos, a former IBM Corp. executive who spent years helping Big Blue amass a forbidding warchest of intellectual property, was approved by a Senate Judiciary Committee Thursday to become the next director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.

A full vote on Kappos' nomination is expected after the Senate's summer recess.

David Kappos is expected to lend the perspective of large technology firms, while shaking up an embattled institution.

Technology companies have long complained that the patent office isn't sufficiently exacting, and awards too many dubious legal protections. Smaller inventors and patent holding firms, however, rely on winning a wide range of patents originated at the office to elbow their way into markets and win licensing fees.

The patent office "has not been able to keep pace with the avalanche of applications it has received in recent years," David Kappos said in testimony delivered on behalf of IBM to the Senate Judiciary Committee in March. That in turn, Kappos complained, has contributed to "increased speculation" and a surplus of lawsuits.

While that echoed the sentiments of many other large technology companies, IBM has a somewhat unique perspective. It has historically developed and acquired patents at an exhaustive pace, setting a standard aspired to by peers such as Microsoft Corp.

Indeed, Microsoft hired Marshall Phelps, Kappos' former colleague at IBM, to head its intellectual property licensing efforts in 2003. The companies' approach has blurred the lines, some say, between simply protecting business lines and seeking to bulk up on legal claims and licensing.

In 2008, IBM topped the list of U.S. technology companies winning patents for the 16th year in a row, with over 4,000. As Kappos noted in his March testimony, IBM became the first company ever to amass that many patents in a single year.

Microsoft ranked fourth, with 2,030 patents - behind Samsung and Canon, and one notch ahead of Intel Corp. IBM, along with many other large technology companies, has supported proposed patent reform legislation on Capitol Hill. That legislation seeks to improve the quality of patents, and cut down on the numerous lawsuits and significant jury awards regularly faced by large companies. ""

Full Article and Source
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/ibm-veteran-gets-panel-ok-to-run-patent-office-2009-08-06
David Kappos, IBM and Kappos,

INTEL, Real 3d, Inc. (SILICON GRAPHICS, INC., LOCKHEED MARTIN & INTEL) and RYJO

" Gerald Stanley - ("Stanley"); Ryan Huisman - ("Huisman"); RYJO - ("RYJO"); Tim Connolly - ("Connolly"); Steve Cochran; David Bolton; Rosalie Bibona - ("Bibona"); Connie Martin; Richard Gentner; Steven A. Behrens; Matt Johannsen; any other John Doe ("John Doe") Intel, Real 3D, Inc. (Silicon Graphics, Inc., Lockheed Martin & Intel) & RYJO partners, affiliates, companies, known or not known at this time; including but not limited to Intel, Real 3D, Inc. (Silicon Graphics, Inc., Lockheed Martin & Intel) & RYJO; Employees, Corporations, Affiliates and any other Intel, Real 3D, Inc. (Silicon Graphics, Inc., Lockheed Martin & Intel) & RYJO related or affiliated entities both individually and professionally. Hereinafter, collectively referred to as ("Intel/R3D"). "

RICO Complaint

So What Did John Calkins Do at Warner Bros. Entertainment ?

He joined Warner Bros. as its Vice President of New Media Business Development in 2000.

So what Does this Mean Exactly? What it says to me is the "New Media" meaning any new invention that comes across my desk, I will squash the inventor, steal the technology and take the credit, then I Will get Big Job Offers at New "heavy hitting IT consultant Firms" where I will then get an offer from SONY to be a wig over there...

If you Look at When John Calkins Joined Warner Bros. Entertainment and let's not forget before that he was into Theme Parks and Retail... Right? Ok then at Warner Bros. in a few Short years he created enough Clout to move on to Lieberfarb and Associates and "Consult" heavy hitting IT Companies such as "Intel Corp." - ok then a couple of years later is the Senior VP of Corporate Development at Sony Pictures.

Ok so in 2000 "In strategic planning and business development, leading the newly combined department will be John Calkins and Gary Meisel, who become Senior Vice Presidents, Corporate Business Development & Strategy. " and Well From the Moment he "Overlooked" the Breach of the Iviewit Confidentiality Agreement He Started Zinging up the Corporate Latter...

My Guess is this is NOT a Well Deserved Concidence but instead a "Who You Know" and "What you Know about them" Sort of a Deal.


Links for Your Research

http://www.timewarner.com/corp/newsroom/pr/0,20812,669285,00.html

http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/patentforfraud.htm
John Calkins

Ok Where Did John Calkins Go after President of Warren N. Lieberfarb & Associates (WNLA)?Senior Vice President of Corporate Development for Sony ..

Boy John Calkins sure does get around, John Calkins must be a hot commodity. Sure PAID off to overlook that Confidentiality Agreement with Iviewit, sure opened alot of Doors for John Calkins

John Calkins Go after President of Warren N. Lieberfarb & Associates (WNLA)? Senior Vice President of Corporate Development for Sony ..

So How is Sony Connected to ALL this, and How does Sony Benefit from Hiring a Guy that has No Morals, Has no Respect for Confidentiality Agreement, Ignores information that Brings HUGE liability to the Company He Works for and in Turn to the Shareholders of Warner Bros.

Why would Sony Hire a Guy Like This?

Is Sony Using the Stolen Iviewit Technology?

What Does John Calkins hold over people to get whatever job he wants?

The Article Below Says ".Prior to coming to Sony Pictures, he was President of Warren N. Lieberfarb & Associates (WNLA), charged with day to day responsibility for the company’s operations in its consulting practice and in its exploration and pursuit of opportunities in broadband video distribution, with backing from Microsoft, Intel and others."

Ok now this is in 2007 Right .. the article? yet the announced of John Calkins joining Lieberfarb and Associates bragging on Heavy Hitters in the IT industry Well this Article DiD not Name "Intel" "Intel Corp."

So at what Point Did Tech Consultant Firm Lieberfarb and Associates with their Head Honcho from Warner Bros.

Who had Full Knowledge of Breach of Confidentiality Agreements and of the Iviewit Stolen Patents, at What Point did Intel Corp. Get to be one of these now infamous Heavy Hitter IT Companies that John Calkins Brags about as part of his Resume Every 2 years or so when he Switches Jobs...

What did John Calkins of Warner Bros. - then of Lieberfarb and Associates - then of Sony - have to say to the CEO of Intel in Order to Get their Business.. maybe John Calkins Said, I know what you did... I know that you are using that Stolen Iviewit Technology, Through some heavy hitting IT business my way and I will Forget all about it... Ok, just a Theory, but Still Makes sense to Me...

Article.. Press Release .. from 2007 Below..

"John Calkins is Senior Vice President of Corporate Development for Sony Pictures Entertainment (SPE), responsible for driving corporate initiatives in emerging business areas, coordinating corporate and divisional investments and divestitures and overseeing the implementation of the SPE mid range planning process.

Prior to coming to Sony Pictures, he was President of Warren N. Lieberfarb & Associates (WNLA), charged with day to day responsibility for the company’s operations in its consulting practice and in its exploration and pursuit of opportunities in broadband video distribution, with backing from Microsoft, Intel and others. He came to WNLA from Warner Bros, where he ultimately held the post of Senior Vice President of Corporate Business Development and Strategy.

In this role, Mr. Calkins became intimately involved in the Studio’s entry into such technology-driven aspects of the entertainment industry as wireless distribution, multi-player video gaming, and Video-on-Demand. He was instrumental in the creation of Movielink, the five-studio joint venture to distribute theatrically-released motion pictures on the Internet. He joined Warner Bros. as its Vice President of New Media Business Development in 2000.

Prior to joining Warner Bros, Calkins was with McKinsey & Company, as an Associate Principal in its Los Angeles office. During his four years at McKinsey, he developed strategic recommendations for companies in such diverse industries as theme parks, the Internet and retailing. He has also held positions with Trammell Crow Company and Pepsico’s Taco Bell restaurant division, and received his MBA from Duke University’s Fuqua School of Business as a Fuqua Scholar, awarded to the top 5% of the class. He has also been active on a number of private company and charity boards of directors."

Source of Above:
http://www.media-tech.net/sc07/conference/speakers/john-calkins.html

John Calkins

Continued Culture of Conflict and Corruption of Ethics Rules and Law - Intel Corporation Trillion Dollar Accounting Fraud

"Continued Culture of Conflict and Corruption of Ethics Rules and Law Appearing in a Sothern District of New York Bankruptcy Court with Major Law Firm Davis Polk Wardell and others This Committee should take Notice of continued conflicts within the operation of Attorneys regulated in New York now appearing in the Southern District of NY Bankruptcy Court here in Manhattan in a recent Ch. 11 proceeding filed by Silicon Graphics Inc (SGI ) on April 1, 2009 where the Davis Polk Wardell firm simultaneously represents 2 of the 3 Equity partners who owned Real3d, representing Lockheed Martin and Debtor in Bankruptcy Silicon Graphics Inc while also representing the KPMG Accountants for Silicon Graphics who prepared the financials in the second Ch. 11 filing for SGI. Davis Polk Wardell also is simultaneously representing CIBC, Credit Suisse, Morgan Stanley, Deutsche Telekom and others under Signed NDA with the Iviewit companies and me.

Real3d Inc, of course, is the company at the center and heart of the Iviewit Technology thefts as related above herein involving Intel, Lockheed Martin and Silicon Graphics owning Real3d where the Technologies were tested and used by Real3d Engineers who deemed them “priceless” while under Non Disclosure Agreements, Licensing Agreements and Strategic Alliance Agreements with Iviewit and me personally initially.

To bring the Conflicts into clear focus, the SGI Ch.11 Bankruptcy was filed just months after coming out of an earlier Ch. 11 protection proceeding and most importantly just 6 DAYS AFTER SGI In House Counsel Evelyn Ramirez was placed on express Notice of a Formal SEC Complaint that I had filed against the Intel Corporation announcing a possible and alleged Multi-Trillion Dollar Accounting Scandal to the SEC for Intel’s failures to report to shareholder in their annual report, Intel
the fact that they are named Defendants in ongoing litigation with certain risks requiring reporting as liability. Further, for their failure to properly account for the misappropriated royalties and costs of knowing infringement whereby reporting those liabilities is also required under FASB No. 5 and related accounting Standards14, also involving Intel and the Sales Transactions of Real3d involving both SGI and Lockheed Martin SEC Complaints were filed.

Thus, not only did SGI file this Ch. 11 protection just 6 days after official notice of involvement in a Multi-Trillion Dollar Lawsuit and accounting scandal thru Real3d Inc, but also the filing comes a few months after SGI had published information in business articles on the web painting a rosy financial picture of the company.

What the SGI Bankruptcy Filings in the Southern District of New York show is that Davis Polk Wardell lawyers are intimately at the Heart of SGI during all of the initial years of the Theft of my Technologies while at Real3d during 1998 while simultaneously DPW is representing Lockheed Martin, 2 of the 3 Equity partners in Real3d Inc where ALL of the Sales transactions are now in question.

To further complicate matters and add another layer of conflict, DPW represents the very Accountants KPMG that SGI is using in the sudden second Ch. 11 bankruptcy filing when one of the very issues at hand is that an Accounting fraud has occurred thus placing Accountants for SGI in Conflict with SGI and Lockheed YET DPW attorneys have remained to Shield and Block due process against all in blatant violation of Attorney Disciplinary Standards for representation of multiple interests and being Witnesses in litigation since officers inside SGI and Lockheed would have to discuss what was informed to the Accountants KPMG and what KPMG knows and more.

Thus, the hearing of any of these Contested Factual issues in the Southern District Bankruptcy Court or any tribunal, commission, authority or agency or other court necessarily forces the Conflicts to be addressed as multiple interests can not be represented by the same law firm yet such Culture of Ethics corruption in New York has allowed these conflicts to continue creating a wall of Title 18 Obstruction of Justice that prevents fair and due process in multiple proceedings since DPW has been permitted to represent 2 Equity partners simultaneously and accountants for an Equity partner where the various parties could otherwise proffer separate and independent statements, evidence, etc. but for the conflicts being permitted to continue.

Shockingly, despite having filed a Formal SEC Complaint against the third Equity partner of Real3d , the Intel Corporation and requesting an investigation of the Sales Transactions involving Real3d, SGI, Lockheed and Intel and alleging a possible Multi-Count, Multi-Trillion Dollar Accounting Fraud for infringement of my technologies and FASB No. 5 and other FASB violations, DPW continues on simultaneously representing multiple interests simultaneously before SDNY Judge Martin Glenn who has deliberately refused to even mention the Conflicts in Bankruptcy proceedings despite multiple oral and written requests to resolve such conflicts leading to a formal request for mandatory disqualification of SDNY Bankruptcy Judge Martin Glenn and oversight of the Bankruptcy judge and investigation for Title 18 obstruction and related charges.

I note for this Committee that according to published sources, the law firm Davis Polk Wardell recruited Linda Chatman Thomsen back to the firm on April 13, 2009 who was the former SEC Head of Enforcement who was ousted at the SEC over the $65 Billion Madoff Ponzi scheme failures.

I also point out to this Committee that April 13, 2009 was only 4 days after I filed an Emergency Motion in the SDNY Bankruptcy Court in the Silicon Graphics Matters on April 9 2009 referencing my Twelve Trillion Dollar alleged Accounting Fraud to the SEC against Intel.

More notably, the SGI Ch. 11 filing came on April 1, 2009 just 6 days after SGI received actual notice of my SEC Complaint against Intel involving Real3d and In House General Counsel Ramirez at SGI had notice of this complaint in the days before the sudden filing by SGI after just emerging from Ch. 11 bankruptcy protection months before and after previously disseminating a rosy financial picture for SGI until my SEC Complaint was filed.

What should be remarkable to this Committee and should have been addressed by SDNY Bankruptcy Judge Glenn upon the filing of my Emergency Motion on April 9, 2009 is that SGI paid out huge sums of monies, in the millions, to former Equity partner in Real3d Inc Intel, to Davis Polk Wardell, to a law firm called Ropes & Gray who represents SGI in the SDNY Bankruptcy along with DPW and who interestingly has Video and Digital related Patents in their names and have refused to officially affirm or disaffirm conflicts in the proceedings, and other large payments to the law firm Sullivan and Cromwell who is currently Joined as Co-Counsel with Proskauer in another SDNY District Court case involving the MPEG Patent Pool, creating an incestuous circle of intertwined conflict.

I note that my Technologies were under Signed NDA with hundreds of companies including Fortune 1000 companies and major industry players such as Credit Suisse, Deutsche Telekom, Comcast, Warner Brothers, AOL – Time Warner, Sony Digital Pictures, Kodak, Wachovia, AT&T and a host of others and that major wall street interests are impacted by these matters thus rendering the work of any future Task Force of this Committee and the work of the Committee monumental for both its impacts upon the financial markets and fundamental to maintain fair and impartial due process and the fair administration of justice within the NYS Courts and NY Bar.

Source of Post
http://74.125.155.132/search?q=cache:ktIVkVh6K68J:www.iviewit.tv/20091005%2520NY%2520Judiciary%2520Committee%2520Prepared%2520Statement.doc+site://www.iviewit.tv+question&cd=2&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us
Bankruptcy Corruption - Fraud

www.DeniedPatent.com

iviewit stolen patent

Kenneth Rubenstein, Esq. - the IviewIt Technology Lawsuit over Stolen Patents

NEW YORK SUPREME COURT FIRST DEPARTMENT ORDERS RUBENSTEIN FOR INVESTIGATION FOR CONFLICT AND VIOLATION OF PUBLIC OFFICES

REBUTTAL RESPONSE TO RUBENSTEIN BAR COMPLAINT

Patent evaluator and creator of the MPEGLA, LLC, and the criminal organizations store front that acts as an anticompetitive monopolistic patent pool, a criminal organization subject to RICO charges as these crimes are tried, currently the crimes are the subject of a several year federal investigation of the patent office and FBI.

If I were you dear reader, I would not pay too much to MPEGLA for a license that is worthless without my inventions. WARNING - to all young inventors, MPEGLA may be a dead inventor pool, whereby they promise inventors a chance to share in royalties of a "standard".

Be weary, they may promise the world to you and then fund you but if they are doing what they have tried to do with me, they are planning on stealing your inventions and ruining your life, an extracting your patents through a variety of racketeering means, if you raise questions or catch them, they try to murder you.

Now here is a guy, this Rubenstein sham, who once given your inventions under attorney/client privilege tries to claim them as his own by putting them into his new law firm Proskauer’s recently acquired patent pool, acquired after learning of our processes Rubenstein then just tries to rub you out.

Rubenstein, in our case, hires a crooked attorney, Raymond Anthony Joao, as his partner to file our patents in his name (Joao puts 90 patents in his name, rivaling Edison) talk about brazen. An attorney turned multi-media inventor, an attorney has not had an inventive idea since Socrates proposed law, he was although a philosopher first. All the while Joao is taking disclosures on the very inventions he is contracted by Rubenstein and Porksour to patent for me, the other inventors and other shareholders.

Rubenstein in his psychosis, then tries to ice you out of your inventions through anticompetitive practices in violation of Sherman and Clayton, with a heavy overtone of Racketeering. Violating virtually all of his federal patent oaths at the patent bar.

Oh yeah, he is under investigation by the United States Patent & Trademark Office for crimes against the United States and foreign nations, along with the FBI, which has caused my patents to be in a limbotic state of suspension, IVIEWIT PATENT SUSPENSION NOTICE.

These guys were above the law, as lawyers they figured they could steal the inventions from me like candy... or so they thought, ah "the best laid plans."

Rubenstein is so grotesque as to become obsessed with your inventions and forget he is even an attorney. He is not a lawyer in the sense of doing societal good, he is a lawyer that has learned ways to rob people through law, more a petty thief, with eyes on the jewels of our country at the patent office? Rubenstein's envy of the inventiveness of inventors is exhibited in virtually his whole being, as he attempts to claim others ideas as his own, he loses part of his brain in the delusions to people like me and I gnaw.

Then when busted, under deposition caught lying, he even tried to claim he never heard of Iviewit or Eliot Bernstein, under sworn oath, in the face of insurmountable evidence against him. He felt above the law with Judge Jorge Labarga, (Labarga infamous for failing to recount the Bush election and passing the election to the Supreme Court, leading to the demise of the country) in his pocket. Yet, as the evidence shows, Rubenstein had far more knowledge of Eliot Bernstein and Iviewit, he was in fact a board member, a shareholder, the lead patent attorney for the company, opining to Warner Bros., Huizenga, Wachovia, investors, etc.

At his deposition, he is confronted with letters from Warner Bros. stating he opined favorably on the Iviewit inventions, this immediately after he claimed that he never heard of us.

You see he was our patent counsel and the conflict with his patent pool (which would be worthless without the Iviewit scaling inventions) was beyond obvious and illegal. He never thought it would get out control, he had thought this through over and over again, with other criminal attorneys (I mean criminals disguised as attorneys) and they failed to account for me. Not only will his MPEG patent stealing scheme be worthless when I am done, so soon shall he be, if he is not already tying his noose.

Investors even relied on Rubenstein's opinion to invest and then wrote letters fingering him, making his deposition statements perjurious. So in his fucked up head, to protect his pools from extinction, he had to steal them?

Hey Ken, the shareholders await the answers to the questions they sent you, how have you failed to answer them, the shareholders of course? Your attempt to try to get rid of the inventors, at any cost, knowing your MPEG sham would have been out of business, especially if we partnered with someone other than MPEG, say Intel, oops they are in this deep with you, so instead say Apple, it would have rendered you and your sham patent pool as impotent as it is soon to become.

Was Kenneth Rubenstein behind the car bombing of my family's car as witnessed on the www.iviewit.tv site? No matter, he was the direct cause; a true freak of nature, I would not trust him with my patents, or yours. "

Source of Post

http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/Book/index.htm#family